Abstract
The chapter explores how the constitutionally guaranteed right of corporative religious freedom is negotiated in German prisons. It does so by looking at the regulatory factors, such as structural and legal conditions, and by studying the religious groups’ modes of negotiating. These negotiations take place under well-defined conditions set on the one hand by the legal state–church relationships in Germany, on the other, by the logic of specific prisons. The author concludes that the research on religion in prison, and on the relation of religion and law, should take place on various levels and from different perspectives, because there are several understandings of what is meant by ‘religion’, and several legal practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The article refers to some results of my research project about the legal practice of positive religious freedom in German prisons. In my project, I explore the negotiation and organization of religious diversity in German prisons. I focus on prisons for male offenders with a long-term sentence of at least 3 years. The goal of the research was to analyse how the right to religious freedom is negotiated in the German penal system. Based on the approaches of the sociology of law and the study of religion, I conducted field studies in German prisons and semi-structured guideline interviews with both prison staff and prison inmates in several German prisons. The selection of the prison-sample was related to regional differences (e.g. urban, rural, or religious landscape) in order to get a broad base of empirical data. For the studies on site, I took 1 week to explore the particular circumstances of each institution. In sum, I collected 80 interviews, numerous documents, and conducted six field studies by way of participant observation. The data was analysed anonymously and by means of the method of qualitative content analysis (Mayring 2010). The results of the project will be published in 2015.
- 2.
This was a primary result of field-studies in prisons in northern and eastern Germany.
- 3.
This was primarily a result of field studies in West Germany and northern Bavaria prisons.
- 4.
These are religious organizations who understand themselves in opposition to the so called ‘mainstream churches’ (Protestant Church of Germany and Roman Catholic Church of Germany) as so-called ‘free-churches’ or smaller groups.
- 5.
As the laws of the federal states vary on this point only in order, but not in content, the national law is quoted throughout. The used translation is provided by the Language Service of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. The translation includes the amendment(s) to the Act by Article 4 of the Act of 5.12.2012. Italics added by the author.
- 6.
Italics added by the author. The first sentence is a common understanding of ‘rehabilitation’ and ‘security’ like Cornel 2009 describes.
- 7.
Italics added by the author.
- 8.
Italics by Goffman.
- 9.
‘Prison sphere’ is a wider understanding of ‘prison institution’ while the first one includes not only the house where the prison sentence is carried out. The ‘prison sphere’ also means transition management after the detention or alternative penalties.
References
Monographs and Article
Alex, M., & Feltes, Th. (2009). Von der Pathogenie des Strafvollzugs. In H.-J. Lange et al. (Ed.), Auf der Suche nach neuer Sicherheit. Fakten, Theorien und Folgen (pp. 89–102). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Amir-Moazami, S. (2005). Muslim challenges to the secular consensus: A german case study. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 13(3), 267–286.
Becci, I. (2012). Imprisoned religion. Transformations of religion during and after imprisonment in Eastern Germany. Farnham, Surrey. England: Ashgate.
Beckford, J. A. (2003). Social theory and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..
Besier, G., & Besier, R.-M. (2001). Jehovah’s Witnesses request for recognition as a corporation under public law in Germany: background, current status, and empirical aspects. Journal of Church and State, 43(1), 35–48.
Cornel, H. (2009). Resozialisierung. Handbuch. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Glaeßner, G.-J. (2001). Sicherheit und Ordnung. Politisch-soziologische Reflexionen zu einem (wieder) aktuellen Thema. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 11(3), 337–358.
Glaeßner, G.-J. (2002). Sicherheit und Freiheit. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 10(11), 3–13.
Glaeßner, G.-J. (2003). Sicherheit in Freiheit. Die Schutzfunktion des demokratischen Staates und die Freiheit der Bürger. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Glaeßner, G.-J. (2006). Security. In A. Harrington et al. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory New York (pp. 538–540). London: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Haug, S., et al. (2009). Muslimisches Leben in Deutschland. Eine Studie im Auftrag der Deutschen Islamkonferenz. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.
Hobbes, Th. (2010 [1651]). Leviathan or the matter, forme, & power of a commonwealth ecclesiasticall and civill. New Haven: Yale University Press (reprint).
Huber, W. (1999). Kirche in der Zeitenwende. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Erneuerung der Kirche. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Jahn, S. (2011). Gefängnisseelsorge in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In M. Klöcker et al. (Ed.), Handbuch der Religionen (pp. 1–31.). Landsberg/Lech: Olzog.
Jahn, S. J. (2013). Religiöses Feld im rechtlichen Raum: Religion im Strafvollzug. In P. Antes et al. (Ed.), Konflikt - Integration - Religion. Religionswissenschaftliche Perspektiven (pp. 121–137.). Göttingen: V&R unipress.
Jahn, S. J. (2014). Zur (Un-)Möglichkeit „islamischer Seelsorge“ im deutschen Justizvollzug. Cibedo-Beiträge, (1), 20–25.
Jähnichen, T. (2010). Caritas und Diakonie im „goldenen Zeitalter“ des Sozialstaates. Auf- und Umbrüche in den konfessionellen Wohlfahrtsverbänden in den 1960er Jahren. In T. Jähnichen (Ed.), Caritas und Diakonie im „goldenen Zeitalter“ des bundesdeutschen Sozialstaats. Transformationen der konfessionellen Wohlfahrtsverbände in den 1960er Jahren (pp. 11–14). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Kehrer, G. (1982). Organisierte religion. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
Kollman, P. (2011). At the origins of mission and missiology: A study in the dynamics of religious language. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79(2), 425–458.
Mayring, Ph (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
Montesquieu, Ch.-L. (2006 [1748]). The spirit of laws. Cambridge et al., University Press (reprint).
Robbers, G. (2001). Religious freedom in Germany. Brigham Young University Review, (2), 643–668.
Schmitt, Th. (2012). Mosque debates as space-related, intercultural, and religious conflicts. In B. Becker-Cantarino (Ed.), Migration, religion, and Germany (pp. 207–217). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Scott, W. R. (1999). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare, and measurement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith. Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sullivan, W. F. (2005). The impossibility of religious freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sullivan, W. F. (2009). Prison religion. Faith-based reform and the constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sykes, G. M. (2003). The society of captives. A study of a maximum security prison. New York: Princeton Paperbacks.
Torpey, J., & Joppke, C. (2013). Legal integration of Islam: A transatlantic comparison. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Internet Resources
Caritas Germany. (2014). Caritas as employer. http://www.caritas.de/fuerprofis/arbeitenbeidercaritas/arbeitgebercaritas/caritasalsarbeitgeber.aspx. Accessed 22 Feb 2014.
Christliches Missionswerk Josua. (2014). About us. http://www.missionswerkjosua.de/ueber-uns. Accessed 29 Sep 2014.
German press agency. (2014). Quarrel in Islam forum. http://www.berlin.de/aktuelles/berlin/3251308-958092-krach-um-muslimische-seelsorge-islamforu.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
Justizministerium Niedersachsen. (2012): Justice Minister Busemann signed agreement between the Muslim associations and the Ministry of Justice. http://www.mj.niedersachsen.de/portal/live.php?navigation_id=3745&article_id=111512&_psmand=1. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
MUSE Wiesbaden. (2014). About us. http://muse-wiesbaden.de/. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
Schnell, L. (2014). From prison to jihad: Islamists seek supporters among German inmates. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/islamists-seek-support-in-german-prisons-a-978720.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
Stadtstaat Hamburg. (2014): Contract Hamburg. http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/3551370/data/download-muslim-verbaende.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
White House Office and Faith-Based and Community Organizations. (2014) The initiative from the president, available via http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/president-initiative.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2014.
Legal Texts
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany in the revised version published in the Federal Law Gazette Part III, classification number 100–1, as last amended by the Act of 21 July 2010 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 944).
Act concerning the execution of prison sentences and measures of rehabilitation and prevention involving deprivation of liberty (Federal Law Gazette I p. 2425; the translation includes the amendment(s) to the Act by Article 4 of the Act of 5.12.2012).
Translation
Original German quotes and transcriptions are the author’s literal translations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jahn, S. (2015). Institutional Logic and Legal Practice: Modes of Regulation of Religious Organizations in German Prisons. In: Becci, I., Roy, O. (eds) Religious Diversity in European Prisons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16778-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16778-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16777-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16778-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)