Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Challenge of Water Governance Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Conceptual and Analytical Framework

verfasst von : Claudia Pahl-Wostl

Erschienen in: Water Governance in the Face of Global Change

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter lays out the major pillars of the conceptual foundations required for improving our understanding of the complex dynamics of water governance systems. After clarifying terminology and providing some reflections on the nature of causality in social systems I sketch out what I consider to be the major building blocks for conceptualizing governance systems and processes of adaptive and transformative change. With this background, the management and transition framework which provides a structured and standardized approach to representing governance systems and processes is introduced.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Water Policy—From Panaceas Towards Embracing Complexity
Nächstes Kapitel The Role of Institutions, Actors and Social Networks in Societal Change
Fußnoten
1
Good governance is participatory, consensus oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive, equitable and inclusive, effective and efficient and follows the rule of law (UNESCAP 2009).
 
Literatur
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass., USA: Addison Wesley.
Benz, A. (2004). Governance—Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? In A. Benz (Ed.), Governance—Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen: Eine Einführung (pp. 11–28). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2002). Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 121–146). Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.
Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (1998). Australian policy handbook. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Casti, J. (1997). Reality rules I & II. Picturing the world in mathematics: The fundamentals, the frontier. Chichester: Wiley.
Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Flood, R., & Romm, N. (1996). Diversity management: Triple loop learning. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRef
Galaz, V., Crona, B., Österblom, H., Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2012). Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries—Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 81, 21–32.CrossRef
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in erveryday life. New York: Anchor.
Gray, B. (2004). Strong opposition: Frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 166–176.CrossRef
Gutiérrez, N., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470, 386–389.CrossRef
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740.CrossRef
Héritier, A. (2002). New modes of governance in Europe: Policy-making without legislating? In A. Héritier (Ed.), Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance (pp. 185–206). Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Holton, R. J. (1998). Globalization and the nation-state. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London, UK: Routledge.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kenward, R. E., Whittingham, M. J., Arampatzis, S., Manos, B. D., Hahn, T., Terry, A., et al. (2011). Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(13), 5308–5312. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​1007933108 CrossRef
Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 14–35). London, UK: Routledge.
Kooiman, J. (2000). Societal governance: Levels, modes and orders of social-political interaction. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy (pp. 138–164). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: SAGE.
Krysanova, V., Dickens, C., Timmerman, J., Varela-Ortega, C., Schlüter, M., Roest, K., et al. (2010). Cross-comparison of climate change adaptation strategies across large river basins in Europe, Africa and Asia. Water Resources Management, 24(14), 4121–4160. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-010-9650-8 CrossRef
Leadley, P., Proença, V., Fernández-Manjarrés, J., Pereira, H. M., Alkemade, R., Biggs, R., et al. (2014). Interacting regional-scale regime shifts for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience,. doi:10.​1093/​biosci/​biu093
Mayntz, R. (2004a). Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? MPIfG Working Papers. Cologne, Germany Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Societies.
Mayntz, R. (2004b). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 237–259.CrossRef
Moss, T. (2003). Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU water framework directive. In H. Breit, A. Engels, T. Moss, & M. Troja (Eds.), How institutions change. Perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts (pp. 85–121). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D., & Tippett, J. (2007). Social Learning in European river-basin management: Barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society, 12(1).
Newig, J., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Sigel, K. (2005). The role of public participation in managing uncertainty in the implementation of the water framework directive. European Environment, 15(6), 333–343.CrossRef
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 15181–15187.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C. (1995). The dynamic nature of ecosystems: Chaos and order entwined. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007a). The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 561–569.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007b). Requirements for adaptive water management. In C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, & J. Möltgen (Eds.), Adaptive and integrated water management. Coping with complexity and uncertainty (pp. 1–22). Heidelberg: Springer.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Becker, G., Sendzimir, J., & Knieper, C. (2013a). How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: A comparative case study analysis on flood management. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 58. doi:10.​5751/​ES-05779-180458 CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Conca, K., Kramer, A., Maestu, J., & Schmidt, F. (2013b). Missing links in global water governance: A processes-oriented analysis. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 33. doi:10.​5751/​ES-05554-180233 CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., & Brugnach, M. (2011). Maturing the new water management paradigm: Progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resources Management, 25(3), 837–856. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-010-9729-2 CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2014). The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change, 29, 139–154.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Lebel, L., Knieper, C., & Nikitina, E. (2012). From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy, 23, 24–34.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Möltgen, J., Ebenhöh, E., & Holtz, G. (2007b). The NeWater management and transition framework—State and development process. In C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, & J. Möltgen (Eds.), Adaptive and integrated water management. Coping with complexity and uncertainty (pp. 75–96). Heidelberg: Springer.
Plummer, R., Armitage, D. R., & de Loe, R. C. (2013). Adaptive Comanagement and Its Relationship to Environmental Governance. Ecology and Society, 18(1), doi:10.​5751/​ES-05383-180121
Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance. TEC Background Papers Nr. 7: Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC).
Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the 21st century. Global Governance, 1, 13–43.
Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Schuppert, G. F. (2006). Governance im Spiegel der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen. In G. F. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance Forschung: Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien (pp. 371–469). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag.
Scott, R. W. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Sendzimir, J., Flachner, Z., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2010). Stalled regime transition in the upper Tisza River Basin: The dynamics of linked action situations. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(7), 604–619.CrossRef
Smith, G. (Ed.). (1999). Goffman and social organization: Studies of a sociological legacy. New York: Routledge.
Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levacic, R., & Mitchell, J. (Eds.). (1991). Markets, hierarchies and networks: The co-ordination of social life. London, UK: Sage Publishers.
UNESCAP. (2009). What is good governance? Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
Young, O. R. (1998). Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Young, O. R. (2002). Usable knowledge: Design principles and institutional diagnostics. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale (pp. 165–190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Young, O. R. (2013). Sugaring off: Enduring insights from long-term research on environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(1), 87–105. doi:10.​1007/​s10784-012-9204-z CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Conceptual and Analytical Framework
verfasst von
Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Water Governance in the Face of Global Change

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21854-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-21855-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7_3