Skip to main content

Origins of the Venn Diagram

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Venn diagrams have turned out to be visual tools that are enormously popular, but diagrams to help visualize relationships between classes or concepts in logic had existed prior to those of John Venn. The use of diagrams to demonstrate valid logical arguments has been found in the works of a few early Aristotelian scholars and appeared in the works of the famed mathematicians Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Leonhard Euler. In a 1686 fragment (which remained unpublished for over 200 years), the universal genius Leibniz illustrated all of Aristotle’s valid syllogisms through circle drawings. In 1761, the much-admired master mathematician Euler used almost identical diagrams to explain the same logical syllogisms. One hundred and twenty years later, John Venn ingeniously altered what he called “Euler circles” to become the familiar diagrams attached to Venn’s name. This paper explores the history of the Venn diagram and its predecessors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. (1619). Aristotelis Stagiritae Peripateticorum Principis Organum (Paris ed.), translated by Julius Pacius a Beriga with commentary. Sebastianum Chappelet. http://books.google.com

  • Bullynck, M. (2013). Erhard Weigel’s contributions to the formation of symbolic logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 34(1), 25–34.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, O. M. (1925). A portable dial in the form of a book, with figures derived from Raymond Lul. Archaeologia, 74, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, W. (1990). Journey through Genius. New York: Penguin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Euler, L. (1770). Lettres a une Princesse D’Allemagne sur divers sujets de physique et de philosophie, Tome second. Mietau et Leipsic: Chez Steidel et compagnie. http://www.e-rara.ch/zut/content/pageview/2380250

  • Euler, L. (1802). Letters of Euler on different subjects in physics and philosophy addressed to a German Princess (CI–CVIII) (2nd ed.), translated by Henry Hunter. London: Murray and Highley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1958). Logic machines and diagrams. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S. W. (1874). Lectures on metaphysics and logic, Vol. III: Lectures on logic, Vol. I (3rd ed.). Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. H. (1764). Neues Organon (Vol. 1, pp. 128–133). Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1903). De Formae Logicae Comprobatione per Linearum Ductus, Phil., VII, B, IV, 1–10. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz, extraits des ms. de la Bibliothèque royale de Hanovre par Louis Couturat. Paris, pp. 292–331. Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris Gallica, http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k68142b.r=Leibniz+Logicae.langEN

  • Leibniz, G. (1966). Logical papers. Translated and edited by G. H. R. Parkinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llull, R. (1609). Opera ea quae ad adinventam ab ipso artem universalem scientiarum. Sumptibus Lazarus Zetzne Bibliopola. Google Books: Bavarian State Library, p. 109. http://books.google.com/books?id=NxhCAAAAcAAJ&pg=RA4-PT875&dq=opera+ea+quae+ad+adinventam+ab+ipso+arte+lullius&hl=en&sa=X&ei=G7ApU_KmFOXA0gHa4oHwCg&ved=0CFAQuwUwBg#v=onepage&q&f=false

  • Nubiola, J. (1993). Juan Luis Vives y Charles S. Peirce. Anuario Filosófico, 26, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, T. (2011). Llull as computer scientist, or Why Llull was one of us. In A. Fidora & C. Sierra (Eds.), Ramon Llull: From the Ars Magna to Artificial Intelligence (pp. 25–38). Barcelona, Spain: Artificial Intelligence Research Institute. http://www.iiia.csic.es/library.

  • Sholz, H. (1961). Abriss der Geschichte der Logik (Concise History of Logic), translated by Kurt F. Leidecker. Philosophical Library, New York (Original work published 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1880). On the diagrammatic and mechanical representations of propositions and reasonings. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 9(59), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic logic. London: Macmillan and Co. Forgotten Books 2012 reprint.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Bennett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bennett, D. (2015). Origins of the Venn Diagram. In: Zack, M., Landry, E. (eds) Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics. Proceedings of the Canadian Society for History and Philosophy of Mathematics/La Société Canadienne d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Mathématiques. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22258-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics