Abstract
The aim of this study is to build on the work of Riahi-Belkaoui (J Int Account Audit Tax 13: 135–143, 2004) and systematically examine on a cross-country basis, many of the key determinants of tax evasion identified by Jackson and Milliron (J Account Literat 5: 125–165, 1986). Based on data for 45 countries, the regression results show that non-economic determinants have the strongest impact on tax evasion. In particular, complexity is the most important determinant of tax evasion. Other important determinants of tax evasion are education, income source, fairness and tax morale. Overall, the regression results indicate that the lower the level of complexity and the higher the level of education, services income source, fairness and tax morale, the lower is the level of tax evasion. The findings are robust to various cross-country control variables, an alternative measure of tax evasion and several interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Occupation status, sanctions, probability of detection and compliant peers are not considered due to the lack of available cross-country data for these determinants.
- 2.
In fact, by combining data from various countries with different tax schedules, this present study is able to separate-out the effects of marginal tax rates and income level.
- 3.
Assuming that measurement error has a normal distribution with a mean of zero and a variance of σ2, averaging of N observations will decrease the variance to σ2/N.
- 4.
- 5.
The 45 countries for which data are available for the study are represented by: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China (PRC), Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungry, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea (South), Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and Venezuela.
- 6.
Significant correlations are also found between tax evasion and some of the control variables. For instance, there are reasonably high correlations (p < 0.01) between TEVA and EDEV (r = −0.63), TEVA and COLONY (r = −0.48) and TEVA and LEGAL (r = −0.44). Correlations are also observed (p < 0.05) between TEVA and PROT (r = −0.29), TEVA and EUCAR (r = 0.29) and TEVA and LACR (r = 0.28). Finally, some marginal correlations are also detected (p < 0.10) between TEVA and EAPR (r = 0.22) and TEVA and CATH (r = 0.21). No significant correlations are found between TEVA and DEMOC, CULT, MUSL or OTHRD.
- 7.
Specifically, correlations (p < 0.01) are found between AGE and GEND (r = 0.44), AGE and ILEVEL (AGE and LILEVEL, r = 0.62; AGE and HILEVEL, r = −0.72), AGE and ISOURCE (AGE and AISOURCE, r = −0.60; AGE and SISOURCE, r = 0.49), AGE and MTR (r = 0.51), AGE and FAIR (r = 0.45), EDUC and FAIR (r = 0.55), ILEVEL and MTR (LILEVEL and MTR, r = 0.52; HILEVEL and MTR, r = −0.58), ISOURCE and FAIR (AISOURCE and FAIR, r = −0.54; SISOURCE and FAIR, r = 0.49) and FAIR and COMP (r = −0.49).
- 8.
These additional results are available from the author upon request.
References
Alm, J.M., and J. Martinez-Vazquez. 2003. Institutions, paradigms, and tax evasion in developing and transition countries. In Public finance in developing and transitional countries, ed. J. Martinez-Vazquez and J.J. Alm Cheltenham, 146–178. UK: Edward Elgar.
Alm, J., G.H. McClelland, and W.D. Schulze. 1999. Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. KYKLOS 48: 141–171.
Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein. 1998. Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 818–860.
Barro, R., and J. Lee. 1994. Sources of economic growth. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 40: 1–46.
Brooks, N., and A.H. Doob. 1990. Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Securing compliance: Seven case studies, ed. M.L. Friedland, 122–164. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Brunetti, A., and B. Weader. 2003. A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics 87: 1801–1824.
Chan, C.W., C.S. Troutman, and D. O’Bryan. 2000. An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 9: 83–103.
Christian, C.W., and S. Gupta. 1993. New evidence on secondary evasion. Journal of the American Taxation Association 16: 72–93.
Clotfelter, C.T. 1983. Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 363–373.
Collins, J.H., V.C. Milliron, and D.R. Toy. 1992. Determinants of tax compliance: A contingency approach. Journal of the American Taxation Association 14: 1–29.
Coleman, C., and L. Freeman. 1997. Cultural foundations of taxpayer attitudes to voluntary compliance. Australian Tax Forum 13: 311–336.
Cuccia, A.D. 1994. The economics of tax compliance: What do we know and where do we go? Journal of Accounting Literature 13: 81–116.
Cummings, R.G., J. Martinez-Vazquez, and M. McKee. 2001. Cross cultural comparisons of tax compliance behavior. Working Paper No. 01-3, International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Das-Gupta, A., R. Lahiri, and D. Mookherjee. 1995. Income tax compliance in India: An empirical analysis. World Development 23: 2051–2064.
Dubin, J.A., and L.L. Wilde. 1988. An empirical analysis of federal income tax auditing and compliance. National Tax Journal 41: 61–74.
Feinstein, J.S. 1991. An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. RAND Journal of Economics 22: 14–35.
Feld, L.P., and J.R. Tyran. 2002. Tax evasion and voting: An experimental analysis. KYKLOS 55: 197–222.
Fisman, R., and R. Gatti. 2002. Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics 83: 325–345.
Freedom House. 2005. Freedom House Country Ratings. New York: Freedom House. http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm.
Gillis, M. 1989. Tax reform in developing countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hanno, D.M., and G.R. Violette. 1996. An analysis of moral and social influences on tax behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8: 57–75.
Hite, A., and M.L. Roberts. 1992. An analysis of tax reform based on taxpayers’ perceptions of fairness and self-interest. Advances in Taxation 4: 115–137.
Inglehart, R. 2003. Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys. Leiden, Boston: Brill. http://nds.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/s/sda/hsda?harcWEVS+wevs.
Inglehart, R., M. Basanez, J. Diez-Medrano, L. Halman, and R. Luijkx. 2004. Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 value surveys. Mexico, Siglo XXI 2004.
Institute of Management Development. 2002. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.
Institute of Management Development. 2003. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.
Institute of Management Development. 2004. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.
Institute for Industrial Policy Studies. 2002. IPS national competitiveness report. Seoul, South Korea: IPS.
Jackson, B.R., and V.C. Milliron. 1986. Tax compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature 5: 125–165.
Klepper, S., and D. Nagin. 1989a. The anatomy of tax evasion. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 5: 1–24.
Klepper, S., and D. Nagin. 1989b. The role of tax preparers in tax compliance. Policy Sciences 22: 167–194.
KPMG. 2003. Asia pacific taxation.Hong Kong: KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com.hk.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1999. The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 222–279.
Long, S., and J. Swingen. 1988. The role of legal complexity in shaping taxpayer compliance. In Lawyers on psychology and psychologists on law, ed. P.J. Van Koppen, P.J.D. Hessing, and G. Van den Heuvel, 127–146. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Long, S., and J. Swingen. 1991. Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review 25: 637–683.
Mason, R., and L. Calvin. 1978. A study of admitted income tax evasion. Law and Society Review 12: 73–89.
Mason, R., and L. Calvin. 1984. Public confidence and admitted tax evasion. National Tax Journal 37: 489–496.
Mason, R., and H. Lowry. 1981. An estimate of income tax evasion in oregon. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University, Survey Research Center.
Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681–712.
Milliron, V.C., and D.R. Toy. 1988. Tax compliance: An investigation of key features. Journal of the American Tax Association 10: 84–104.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Tax database. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/2/1942506.xls.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Tax administration in OECD countries. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/2/33866659.pdf.
Pommerehne, W.W., and H. Weck-Hannemann. 1996. Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice 88: 161–170.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2004. Individual taxes 2004–2005: Worldwide summaries. New York: John Wiley.
Quirk, P.J. 1997. Money laundering: Muddying the macro economy. Finance and Development 34: 7–9.
Riahi-Belkaoiu, A. 2004. Relationship between tax compliance internationally and selected determinants of tax morale. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 13: 135–143.
Richardson, M., and A.J. Sawyer. 2001. A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: Further findings, problems and prospects. Australian Tax Forum 16: 137–320.
Richupan, S. 1984. Income tax evasion: A review of the measurement of techniques and some estimates for the developing countries. Department Memorandum No. DM/84/46, The International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, DC.
Sarker, T.K. 2003. Improving tax compliance in developing countries via self-assessment systems—what could Bangladesh learn from Japan? Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin 9: 170–176.
Schmolders, G. 1970. Survey research in public finance: A behavioral approach to fiscal theory. Public Finance 25: 300–306.
Song, Y., and T. Yarbrough. 1978. Tax ethics and tax attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review 58: 442–452.
Spicer, M. 1974. A behavioral model of income tax evasion. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.
Spicer, M., and S. Lundstedt. 1976. Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology 2: 241–245.
Tan, L.M., and A.J. Sawyer. 2003. A synopsis of taxpayer compliance studies: Overseas vis-à-vis New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy 9: 431–454.
Tanzi, V. 2000. Policies, institutions and the dark side of economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Tittle, C. 1980. Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.
Torgler, B. 2003a. Tax morale and tax evasion: Evidence from the United States. WWZ Discussion Paper 02/-7, Basel, Switzerland.
Torgler, B. 2003b. Tax morale and institutions. Working Paper No. 2003-09, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Basel, Switzerland.
Torgler, B. 2005. Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice 122: 133–157.
Torgler, B., and K. Murphy. 2004. Tax morale in Australia: what shapes it and has it changed over time? Journal of Australian Taxation 7: 298–335.
Torgler, B., C.A. Schaltegger, and M. Schaffner. 2003. Is forgiveness divine? A cross-culture comparison of tax amnesties. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 139: 375–396.
Treisman, D. 2000. The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics 76: 399–457.
Vogel, J. 1974. Taxation and public opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of recent survey data. National Tax Journal 27: 499–513.
Wallschutzky, I. 1984. Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 5: 371–384.
Witte, A.D., and D.F. Woodbury. 1983. The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance. Working Paper 83-1, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Witte, A.D., and D.F. Woodbury. 1985. The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the US individual income tax. National Tax Journal 38: 1–13.
World Bank. 2005a. 2005 world development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2005b. 2005 world bank group—data and statistics. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/classgroups.htm.
World Economic Forum. 2002. The global competitiveness report 2001–2002. Geneva: WEF.
World Economic Forum. 2003. The global competitiveness report 2002–2003. Geneva: WEF.
World Economic Forum. 2004. The global competitiveness report 2003–2004. Geneva: WEF.
You, J.S., and S. Khagram. 2005. A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review 70: 136–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Data Description and Sources
Variable | Description | Source |
---|---|---|
Tax evasion (TEVA) | • Country rating that tax evasion is minimal (on a scale from 1—strongly disagree to 7—strongly agree) averaged for 2002–2004. This scale was transformed by deducting the country score from 8 to obtaining an increasing scale of tax evasion • Country rating of tax evasion (on a scale from 0—common to 10—not common) averaged for 2002–2004. This variable was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of tax evasion | Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum 2002, 2003, 2004) World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004) |
Age (AGE) | Percentage of the population which is greater than 65 years of age averaged for 2002–2004 | 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a) |
Gender (GEND) | Percentage of the population which is female averaged for 2002–2004 | 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a) |
Education (EDUC) | Country rating of the quality of the education system for a competitive economy (on a scale from 1—low to 7—high) averaged for 2002–2004 | World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004) |
Income level (ILEVEL) | • Proportion of household income going to the lowest 20 % of households (LILEVEL) averaged for 2002–2004 • Proportion of household income going to the highest 20 % of households (HILEVEL) averaged for 2002–2004 | World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004) |
Income source (ISOURCE) | • Employment by sector: agriculture percentage of total employment (AISOURCE) averaged for 2002–2004 • Employment by sector: services percentage of total employment (SISOURCE) averaged for 2002–2004 | World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004) |
Marginal tax rates (MTR) | The top marginal income tax rate for individuals of a country | 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a) |
Fairness (FAIR) | Country rating of the fairness of tax policy (on a scale from 0—low fairness to 8—high fairness) for the 2002 year | IPS National Competitiveness Report (Institute for Industrial Policy Studies 2002) |
Complexity (COMP) | Country rating of tax system complexity (on a scale from 1—high complexity to 7—low complexity) averaged for 2003–2004 | Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum 2003, 2004) |
Revenue authority contact (SELFA) | Dummy variable of 1 if the country has a self-assessment tax system, 0 otherwise | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004) http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/2/33866659.pdf PricewaterhouseCoopers (2004) KPMG (2003) http://www.kpmg.com.hk |
Tax morale (MORALE) | Country rating of cheating on taxes if you have the chance (on a scale from 1—never justifiable to 10—always justifiable) averaged for the 1981, 1990, 1995 and 1999 World Value Surveys. This variable was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of tax morale | Inglehart (2003) http://nds.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/s/sda/hsda?harcWEVS+wevs Inglehart et al. (2004) |
Economic development (EDEV) | Natural log of GDP per capita averaged for 2001–2003 | 2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a) |
Democracy (DEMOC) | Political rights index developed by Freedom House (on a scale from 1—high political rights to 7—low political rights), averaged for 2002–2004. This index was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of democracy | Freedom House (2005) |
Culture (CULT) | Ethnolinguistic fractionalization index measures the probability that two randomly selected individuals within a country belong to the same ethnic group. It is an index between 0 and 100, with 100 denoting lower fractionalization | Mauro (1995) |
Religion (RELIG) | The percentages of Protestants (PROT), Catholics (CATH), Muslims (MUSL) and Other Denominations (OTHRD) in 1980 or 1990–1995 for countries of recent formation | La Porta et al. (1999) |
Legal system (LEGAL) | Dummy variable of 1 if the country is a common law system country, 0 otherwise | La Porta et al. (1999) |
Colonial heritage (COLONY) | Dummy variable of 1 if the country was ever a colony, 0 otherwise | Barro and Lee (1994) |
Regional developing countries (REGION) | • Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the East Asia and Pacific region (EAPR), 0 otherwise • Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the Europe and Central Asia region (EUCAR), 0 otherwise • Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the Latin America and the Caribbean region (LACR), 0 otherwise | World Bank Group—Data and Statistics (World Bank 2005b) http://www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/classgroups.htm |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richardson, G. (2016). The Determinants of Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Study. In: Dion, M., Weisstub, D., Richet, JL. (eds) Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32418-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32419-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)