Skip to main content

The Determinants of Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 68))

Abstract

The aim of this study is to build on the work of Riahi-Belkaoui (J Int Account Audit Tax 13: 135–143, 2004) and systematically examine on a cross-country basis, many of the key determinants of tax evasion identified by Jackson and Milliron (J Account Literat 5: 125–165, 1986). Based on data for 45 countries, the regression results show that non-economic determinants have the strongest impact on tax evasion. In particular, complexity is the most important determinant of tax evasion. Other important determinants of tax evasion are education, income source, fairness and tax morale. Overall, the regression results indicate that the lower the level of complexity and the higher the level of education, services income source, fairness and tax morale, the lower is the level of tax evasion. The findings are robust to various cross-country control variables, an alternative measure of tax evasion and several interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Occupation status, sanctions, probability of detection and compliant peers are not considered due to the lack of available cross-country data for these determinants.

  2. 2.

    In fact, by combining data from various countries with different tax schedules, this present study is able to separate-out the effects of marginal tax rates and income level.

  3. 3.

    Assuming that measurement error has a normal distribution with a mean of zero and a variance of σ2, averaging of N observations will decrease the variance to σ2/N.

  4. 4.

    The age of ‘65’ has been used as the cut-off point to represent older tax payers in tax evasion research by Clotfelter (1983) and Witte and Woodbury (1985), for example.

  5. 5.

    The 45 countries for which data are available for the study are represented by: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China (PRC), Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungry, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea (South), Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and Venezuela.

  6. 6.

    Significant correlations are also found between tax evasion and some of the control variables. For instance, there are reasonably high correlations (p < 0.01) between TEVA and EDEV (r = −0.63), TEVA and COLONY (r = −0.48) and TEVA and LEGAL (r = −0.44). Correlations are also observed (p < 0.05) between TEVA and PROT (r = −0.29), TEVA and EUCAR (r = 0.29) and TEVA and LACR (r = 0.28). Finally, some marginal correlations are also detected (p < 0.10) between TEVA and EAPR (r = 0.22) and TEVA and CATH (r = 0.21). No significant correlations are found between TEVA and DEMOC, CULT, MUSL or OTHRD.

  7. 7.

    Specifically, correlations (p < 0.01) are found between AGE and GEND (r = 0.44), AGE and ILEVEL (AGE and LILEVEL, r = 0.62; AGE and HILEVEL, r = −0.72), AGE and ISOURCE (AGE and AISOURCE, r = −0.60; AGE and SISOURCE, r = 0.49), AGE and MTR (r = 0.51), AGE and FAIR (r = 0.45), EDUC and FAIR (r = 0.55), ILEVEL and MTR (LILEVEL and MTR, r = 0.52; HILEVEL and MTR, r = −0.58), ISOURCE and FAIR (AISOURCE and FAIR, r = −0.54; SISOURCE and FAIR, r = 0.49) and FAIR and COMP (r = −0.49).

  8. 8.

    These additional results are available from the author upon request.

References

  • Alm, J.M., and J. Martinez-Vazquez. 2003. Institutions, paradigms, and tax evasion in developing and transition countries. In Public finance in developing and transitional countries, ed. J. Martinez-Vazquez and J.J. Alm Cheltenham, 146–178. UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., G.H. McClelland, and W.D. Schulze. 1999. Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. KYKLOS 48: 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein. 1998. Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., and J. Lee. 1994. Sources of economic growth. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 40: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N., and A.H. Doob. 1990. Tax evasion: Searching for a theory of compliant behavior. In Securing compliance: Seven case studies, ed. M.L. Friedland, 122–164. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., and B. Weader. 2003. A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics 87: 1801–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C.W., C.S. Troutman, and D. O’Bryan. 2000. An expanded model of taxpayer compliance: Empirical evidence from the United States and Hong Kong. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 9: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, C.W., and S. Gupta. 1993. New evidence on secondary evasion. Journal of the American Taxation Association 16: 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C.T. 1983. Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.H., V.C. Milliron, and D.R. Toy. 1992. Determinants of tax compliance: A contingency approach. Journal of the American Taxation Association 14: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, C., and L. Freeman. 1997. Cultural foundations of taxpayer attitudes to voluntary compliance. Australian Tax Forum 13: 311–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccia, A.D. 1994. The economics of tax compliance: What do we know and where do we go? Journal of Accounting Literature 13: 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R.G., J. Martinez-Vazquez, and M. McKee. 2001. Cross cultural comparisons of tax compliance behavior. Working Paper No. 01-3, International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das-Gupta, A., R. Lahiri, and D. Mookherjee. 1995. Income tax compliance in India: An empirical analysis. World Development 23: 2051–2064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J.A., and L.L. Wilde. 1988. An empirical analysis of federal income tax auditing and compliance. National Tax Journal 41: 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, J.S. 1991. An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. RAND Journal of Economics 22: 14–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and J.R. Tyran. 2002. Tax evasion and voting: An experimental analysis. KYKLOS 55: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., and R. Gatti. 2002. Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics 83: 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2005. Freedom House Country Ratings. New York: Freedom House. http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm.

  • Gillis, M. 1989. Tax reform in developing countries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanno, D.M., and G.R. Violette. 1996. An analysis of moral and social influences on tax behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8: 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, A., and M.L. Roberts. 1992. An analysis of tax reform based on taxpayers’ perceptions of fairness and self-interest. Advances in Taxation 4: 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 2003. Human values and social change: Findings from the values surveys. Leiden, Boston: Brill. http://nds.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/s/sda/hsda?harcWEVS+wevs.

  • Inglehart, R., M. Basanez, J. Diez-Medrano, L. Halman, and R. Luijkx. 2004. Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 value surveys. Mexico, Siglo XXI 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Management Development. 2002. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Management Development. 2003. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Management Development. 2004. The world competitiveness yearbook. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Industrial Policy Studies. 2002. IPS national competitiveness report. Seoul, South Korea: IPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, B.R., and V.C. Milliron. 1986. Tax compliance research: Findings, problems and prospects. Journal of Accounting Literature 5: 125–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S., and D. Nagin. 1989a. The anatomy of tax evasion. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 5: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S., and D. Nagin. 1989b. The role of tax preparers in tax compliance. Policy Sciences 22: 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. 2003. Asia pacific taxation.Hong Kong: KPMG. http://www.kpmg.com.hk.

  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1999. The quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., and J. Swingen. 1988. The role of legal complexity in shaping taxpayer compliance. In Lawyers on psychology and psychologists on law, ed. P.J. Van Koppen, P.J.D. Hessing, and G. Van den Heuvel, 127–146. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., and J. Swingen. 1991. Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review 25: 637–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., and L. Calvin. 1978. A study of admitted income tax evasion. Law and Society Review 12: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., and L. Calvin. 1984. Public confidence and admitted tax evasion. National Tax Journal 37: 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., and H. Lowry. 1981. An estimate of income tax evasion in oregon. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University, Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliron, V.C., and D.R. Toy. 1988. Tax compliance: An investigation of key features. Journal of the American Tax Association 10: 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Tax database. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/44/2/1942506.xls.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Tax administration in OECD countries. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/2/33866659.pdf.

  • Pommerehne, W.W., and H. Weck-Hannemann. 1996. Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice 88: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2004. Individual taxes 2004–2005: Worldwide summaries. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, P.J. 1997. Money laundering: Muddying the macro economy. Finance and Development 34: 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoiu, A. 2004. Relationship between tax compliance internationally and selected determinants of tax morale. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 13: 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., and A.J. Sawyer. 2001. A taxonomy of the tax compliance literature: Further findings, problems and prospects. Australian Tax Forum 16: 137–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richupan, S. 1984. Income tax evasion: A review of the measurement of techniques and some estimates for the developing countries. Department Memorandum No. DM/84/46, The International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, T.K. 2003. Improving tax compliance in developing countries via self-assessment systems—what could Bangladesh learn from Japan? Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin 9: 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmolders, G. 1970. Survey research in public finance: A behavioral approach to fiscal theory. Public Finance 25: 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., and T. Yarbrough. 1978. Tax ethics and tax attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review 58: 442–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, M. 1974. A behavioral model of income tax evasion. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, M., and S. Lundstedt. 1976. Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology 2: 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L.M., and A.J. Sawyer. 2003. A synopsis of taxpayer compliance studies: Overseas vis-à-vis New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy 9: 431–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. 2000. Policies, institutions and the dark side of economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. 1980. Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. 2003a. Tax morale and tax evasion: Evidence from the United States. WWZ Discussion Paper 02/-7, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. 2003b. Tax morale and institutions. Working Paper No. 2003-09, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. 2005. Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice 122: 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., and K. Murphy. 2004. Tax morale in Australia: what shapes it and has it changed over time? Journal of Australian Taxation 7: 298–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., C.A. Schaltegger, and M. Schaffner. 2003. Is forgiveness divine? A cross-culture comparison of tax amnesties. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 139: 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. 2000. The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics 76: 399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J. 1974. Taxation and public opinion in Sweden: An interpretation of recent survey data. National Tax Journal 27: 499–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallschutzky, I. 1984. Possible causes of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology 5: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A.D., and D.F. Woodbury. 1983. The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance. Working Paper 83-1, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, A.D., and D.F. Woodbury. 1985. The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the US individual income tax. National Tax Journal 38: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2005a. 2005 world development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2005b. 2005 world bank group—data and statistics. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/classgroups.htm.

  • World Economic Forum. 2002. The global competitiveness report 2001–2002. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. 2003. The global competitiveness report 2002–2003. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. 2004. The global competitiveness report 2003–2004. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, J.S., and S. Khagram. 2005. A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review 70: 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Richardson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Data Description and Sources

Variable

Description

Source

Tax evasion (TEVA)

• Country rating that tax evasion is minimal (on a scale from 1—strongly disagree to 7—strongly agree) averaged for 2002–2004. This scale was transformed by deducting the country score from 8 to obtaining an increasing scale of tax evasion

• Country rating of tax evasion (on a scale from 0—common to 10—not common) averaged for 2002–2004. This variable was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of tax evasion

Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum 2002, 2003, 2004)

World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004)

Age (AGE)

Percentage of the population which is greater than 65 years of age averaged for 2002–2004

2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a)

Gender (GEND)

Percentage of the population which is female averaged for 2002–2004

2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a)

Education (EDUC)

Country rating of the quality of the education system for a competitive economy (on a scale from 1—low to 7—high) averaged for 2002–2004

World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004)

Income level (ILEVEL)

• Proportion of household income going to the lowest 20 % of households (LILEVEL) averaged for 2002–2004

• Proportion of household income going to the highest 20 % of households (HILEVEL) averaged for 2002–2004

World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004)

Income source (ISOURCE)

• Employment by sector: agriculture percentage of total employment (AISOURCE) averaged for 2002–2004

• Employment by sector: services percentage of total employment (SISOURCE) averaged for 2002–2004

World Competitiveness Year Book (Institute of Management Development 2002, 2003, 2004)

Marginal tax rates (MTR)

The top marginal income tax rate for individuals of a country

2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a)

Fairness (FAIR)

Country rating of the fairness of tax policy (on a scale from 0—low fairness to 8—high fairness) for the 2002 year

IPS National Competitiveness Report (Institute for Industrial Policy Studies 2002)

Complexity (COMP)

Country rating of tax system complexity (on a scale from 1—high complexity to 7—low complexity) averaged for 2003–2004

Global Competitiveness Report (World Economic Forum 2003, 2004)

Revenue authority contact (SELFA)

Dummy variable of 1 if the country has a self-assessment tax system, 0 otherwise

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004)

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/2/33866659.pdf

PricewaterhouseCoopers (2004)

KPMG (2003) http://www.kpmg.com.hk

Tax morale (MORALE)

Country rating of cheating on taxes if you have the chance (on a scale from 1—never justifiable to 10—always justifiable) averaged for the 1981, 1990, 1995 and 1999 World Value Surveys. This variable was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of tax morale

Inglehart (2003)

http://nds.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/s/sda/hsda?harcWEVS+wevs

Inglehart et al. (2004)

Economic development (EDEV)

Natural log of GDP per capita averaged for 2001–2003

2005 World Development Indicators (World Bank 2005a)

Democracy (DEMOC)

Political rights index developed by Freedom House (on a scale from 1—high political rights to 7—low political rights), averaged for 2002–2004. This index was transformed to obtain an increasing scale of democracy

Freedom House (2005)

http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm

Culture (CULT)

Ethnolinguistic fractionalization index measures the probability that two randomly selected individuals within a country belong to the same ethnic group. It is an index between 0 and 100, with 100 denoting lower fractionalization

Mauro (1995)

Religion (RELIG)

The percentages of Protestants (PROT), Catholics (CATH), Muslims (MUSL) and Other Denominations (OTHRD) in 1980 or 1990–1995 for countries of recent formation

La Porta et al. (1999)

Legal system (LEGAL)

Dummy variable of 1 if the country is a common law system country, 0 otherwise

La Porta et al. (1999)

Colonial heritage (COLONY)

Dummy variable of 1 if the country was ever a colony, 0 otherwise

Barro and Lee (1994)

Regional developing countries (REGION)

• Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the East Asia and Pacific region (EAPR), 0 otherwise

• Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the Europe and Central Asia region (EUCAR), 0 otherwise

• Dummy variable of 1 if the developing country is in the Latin America and the Caribbean region (LACR), 0 otherwise

World Bank GroupData and Statistics (World Bank 2005b) http://www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/classgroups.htm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, G. (2016). The Determinants of Tax Evasion: A Cross-Country Study. In: Dion, M., Weisstub, D., Richet, JL. (eds) Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics