nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

23. Geomatics and Water Policy

verfasst von : Wanhong Yang

Erschienen in: Water Policy and Governance in Canada

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Geomatics including remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) is the geospatial technology for gathering, management, analysis, and dissemination of spatially referenced information. Water policy is the governance framework including legislation/regulation, standard, planning and management of water resources. Water policy involves complex physical, biological, economic, social, and political processes, and manifests at location, subbasin, watershed, regional, national, and international scales. Water policy has an inherently spatial dimension which offers opportunities for Geomatics support. The applications of Geomatics for supporting water management and policy can be classified into three categories: Firstly, Geomatics supports acquisition, storage, management, visualization, and distribution of water and related datasets. Secondly, Geomatics supports spatial analysis of water resources including GIS and water modelling integration. Lastly, Geomatics supports decision making in water policy including the development of water related spatial decision support systems. While Geomatics has a great potential to support water management and policy in Canada, several strategic issues needs to be addressed. A Geomatics framework needs to be developed for water data gathering, analyzing and visualizing. Technology standards need to be developed for integrating Geomatics with water models. Particularly, Geomatics visualization technologies needs to be further developed to improve accessibility of water information for non-technical users.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Shifting Perspectives in an Era of Complexity and Change: Incorporating Resilience into the Water Governance of Canadian Drainage Basins

Anmala, J., Meier, O., Meier, A., & Grubbs, S. (2015). GIS and artificial neural network–based water quality model for a stream network in the Upper Green River Basin, Kentucky, USA. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 141(5), 04014082.CrossRef

Arnold, J. G., Moriasi, D. N., Gassman, P. W., Abbaspour, K. C., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., Harmel, R. D., van Griensven, A., Van Liew, M. W., Kannan, N., & Jha, M. K. (2012). SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), 1491–1508.CrossRef

Assaf, H., & Saadeh, M. (2008). Assessing water quality management options in the Upper Litani Basin, Lebanon, using an integrated GIS-based decision support system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23, 1327–1337.CrossRef

Beven, K. (1995). Linking parameters across scales: Subgrid parameterizations and scale dependent hydrological models. Hydrological Processes, 9, 507–525.CrossRef

Binding, C. E., Greenberg, T. A., & Bukata, R. P. (2012). An analysis of MODIS-derived algal and mineral turbidity in Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 38(1), 107–116.CrossRef

Bocaniov, S. A., Smith, R. E. H., Spillman, C. M., Hipsey, M. R., & Leon, L. F. (2014). The nearshore shunt and the decline of the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Laurentian Great Lakes: Insights from a three-dimensional lake model. Hydrobiologia, 731, 151–172.CrossRef

Brown, G. (2012). Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal, 24(2), 7–18.

Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27(3), 172–181.CrossRef

Cai, X., McKinney, D., & Lasdon, L. (2003). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(1), 4–17.CrossRef

Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., Ekroos, A., & Hallikainen, M. (2004). The role of remote sensing technology in the EU water framework directive (WFD). Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 267–276.CrossRef

Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., & Hallikainen, M. (2007). Water quality monitoring using remote sensing in support of the EU water framework directive (WFD): A case study in the Gulf of Finland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 124, 157–166.CrossRef

Devillers, R., Stein, A., Bédard, Y., Chrisman, N., Fisher, P., & Shi, W. (2010). Thirty years of research on spatial data quality: Achievements, failures, and opportunities. Transactions in GIS, 14, 387–400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01212.x.CrossRef

DHI. (2012). MIKE SHE user manual. Hørsholm: Danish Hydrologic Institute. http://dssplanning.dhigroup.com/links/MIKE_SHE_Printed_V1.pdf.

Dinar, A. (1998). Water policy reforms: Information needs and implementation obstacles. Water Policy, 1(4), 367–382.CrossRef

Dworak, T., Gonzalez, C., Laaser, C., & Interwies, E. (2005). The need for new monitoring tools to implement the WFD. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 301–306.CrossRef

Faramarzi, M., Abbaspour, K. C., Vaghefi, S. A., Farzaneh, M. R., Zehnder, A. J. B., Srinivasan, R., & Yang, H. (2013). Modeling impacts of climate change on freshwater availability in Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 480, 85–101.CrossRef

Faramarzi, M., Srinivasan, R., Iravani, M., Bladon, K. D., Abbaspour, K. C., Zehnder, A. J. B., & Goss, G. G. (2015). Setting up a hydrological model of Alberta: Data discrimination analyses prior to calibration. Environmental Modelling & Software, 74, 48–65.CrossRef

Flanagan, D. C., Frankenberger, J. R., Cochrane, T. A., Renschler, C. S., & Elliot, W. J. (2013). Geospatial application of the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model. Transactions of the ASABE, 56(2), 591–601.CrossRef

Fotakis, D., & Sidiropoulos, E. (2014). Combined land-use and water allocation planning. Annals of Operations Research, 219, 169–185.CrossRef

Gassman, P. W., Williams, J. R., Wang, X., Saleh, A., Osei, E., Hauck, L. M., Izaurralde, R. C., & Flowers, J. D. (2010). The agricultural policy/environmental eXtender (APEX) model: An emerging tool for landscape and watershed environmental analyses. Transactions of the ASABE, 53(3), 711–740.CrossRef

George, C., & Leon, L. F. (2008). WaterBase: SWAT in an open source GIS. The Open Hydrology Journal, 2, 1–6.CrossRef

Ghebremichael, L. T., Veith, T. L., & Hamlett, J. M. (2013). Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 381–394.

Heineman, M. C. (2001). An Arc View GIS tool for SWMM. Journal of Water Management Modeling R207–R211. doi:10.14796/JWMM .R207-11

Heywood, I., Cornelius, S., & Carver, S. (2012). An introduction to geographical information systems. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Jaber, F. H. & Shukla, S. (2012). MIKE SHE: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), 1479–1489.

Johnson, M.-V. V., Norfleet, M. L., Atwood, J. D., Behrman, K. D., Kiniry, J. R., Arnold, J. G., White, M. J., & Williams, J. (2015). The Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP): A national scale natural resources and conservation needs assessment and decision support tool. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 25, 012012.CrossRef

Jones, D., Jones, N., Greer, J., & Nelson, J. (2015). A cloud based MODFLOW service for aquifer management decision support. Computers & Geosciences, 78, 81–87.CrossRef

Jonkman, S. N., Bočkarjova, M., Kok, M., & Bernardini, P. (2008). Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 77–90.CrossRef

Kragt, M. E., Newham, L. T. H., Bennett, J., & Jakeman, A. L. (2011). An integrated approach to linking economic valuation and catchment modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 92–102.CrossRef

Kubíčeka, P., & Šašinkaa, Č. (2011). Hematic uncertainty visualization usability – Comparison of basic methods. Annals of GIS, 17(4), 253–263.

Kulkarni, A. T., Mohanty, J., Eldho, T. I., Rao, E. P., & Mohan, B. K. (2014). A web GIS based integrated flood assessment modeling tool for coastal urban watersheds. Computers & Geosciences, 64, 7–14.CrossRef

Maidment, D. R. (2002). Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources. Redlands: ESRI Press.

Maloney, K. O., Talbert, C. B., Cole, J. C., Galbraith, H. S., Blakeslee, C. J., Hanson, L., & Holmquist-Johnson, C. L. (2015). An integrated Riverine Environmental Flow Decision Support System (REFDSS) to evaluate the ecological effects of alternative flow scenarios on river ecosystems. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 186(1–2), 171–192.CrossRef

Martin, P. H., LeBoeuf, E. J., Dobbins, J. P., Daniel, E. B., & Abkowitz, M. D. (2005). Interfacing GIS with water resource models: A state- of-the-art review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(6), 1471–1487.CrossRef

Natural Resources Canada. (2013). Geomatics. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geomatics/10776

Ormsby, T., Napoleon, E., Burke, R., Groessl, C., & Bowden, L. (2010). Getting to know ArcGIS desktop. Redlands: ESRI Press.

Pease, M., & Murray, J. (2014). Making water resource decisions more “Informationally” efficient: Development of a geospatial water rights decision support system for Kittitas County, Washington. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research, 1(2), 1–12.

Pulido-Velazquez, M., Andreu, J., Sahuquillo, A., & Pulido-Velazquez, D. (2008). Hydro-economic river basin modelling: The application of a holistic surface–groundwater model to assess opportunity costs of water use in Spain. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 51–66.CrossRef

Qi, H., & Altinakar, M. S. (2011). A GIS-based decision support system for integrated flood management under uncertainty with two dimensional numerical simulations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 817–821.CrossRef

Quevauviller, P., Balabanis, P., Fragakis, C., Weydert, M., Oliver, M., Kaschl, A., Arnold, G., Kroll, A., Galbiati, L., Zaldivar, J. M., & Bidoglio, G. (2005). Science-policy integration needs in support of the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 203–211.CrossRef

Refsgaard, J. C., van der Sluijs, J. P., Højberg, A. L., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007). Uncertainty in the environmental modelling processes – A framework and guidance. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1543–1556.CrossRef

Rousseau, K., & Lawrence, P. L. (2013). The application of GIS in watershed planning: The case of the western Lake Erie Basin. In J. D. Gatrell & R. R. Jensen (Eds.), Geospatial tools for urban water resources (Geotechnologies and the environment, Vol. 7, pp. 145–159). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Shamsi, U. M., Smith, P. (2005). ArcGIS and SWMM integration. Journal of Water Management Modeling, 296–307. doi: 10.14796/JWMM. R223–15

Torgersen, C. E., Faux, R. N., McIntosh, B. A., Poage, N. J., & Norton, D. J. (2001). Airborne thermal remote sensing for water temperature assessment in rivers and streams. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 76, 386–398.CrossRef

Triana, E., & Labadie, J. W. (2012). GIS-based decision support system for improved operations and efficiency conservation in large-scale irrigation systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138(10), 857–867.CrossRef

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2011). HEC-GeoRAS – GIS tools for support of HEC-RAS using ArcGIS: User’s manual.

Verma, S., Verma, R. K., Singh, A., & Naik, N. S. (2012). Web-based GIS and desktop open source GIS software: An emerging innovative approach for water resources management. In D. C. Wyld et al. (Eds.), Advances in computer science, engineering & applications, AISC 167 (pp. 1061–1074). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Ward, F. A., & Pulido-Velázquez, M. (2008). Efficiency, equity, and sustainability in a water quantity–quality optimization model in the Rio Grande basin. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 23–37.CrossRef

Watanabe, M., Adams, R. M., & Wu, J. (2006). Economics of environmental management in a spatially heterogeneous River Basin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(3), 617–631.CrossRef

Wilson, J. P., Mitasova, H., & Wright, D. J. (2000). Water resource applications of geographic information systems. URISA Journal, 12(2), 61–79.

Wing, M. G. & Godwin, D. (2011). SWAMP GIS: A spatial decision support system for predicting and treating stormwater runoff. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 11(2), 21–32.

Xiao, H. (2003). An integrated GIS-AnnAGNPS modeling interface for non-point source pollution assessment. Twenty-third annual ESRI International User Conference proceedings: GIS serving our world. ESRI, Redlands, California.

Yang, W. (2011). Developing open access in conservation research. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 66(1), 6A–8A.CrossRef

Yang, W., Khanna, M., Farnsworth, R., & Onal, H. (2003). Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to determine cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds. Ecological Economics, 46, 249–267.CrossRef

Yang, W., Sheng, C., & Voroney, P. (2005). Spatial targeting of conservation tillage to improve water quality and carbon retention benefits. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 477–500.CrossRef

Yang, W., Rousseau, A. N., & Boxall, P. (2007). An integrated economic-hydrologic modeling framework for the watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 62(6), 423–432.

Yang, W., Wang, X., Liu, Y. B., Gabor, S., Boychuk, L., & Badiou, P. (2010). Simulated environmental effects of wetland restoration scenarios in a typical Canadian prairie watershed. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 18(3), 269–279.CrossRef

Yang, W., Liu, W., Liu, Y. B., Corry, R. C., & Kreutzwiser, R. D. (2014). Cost-effective targeting of riparian buffers to achieve water quality and wildlife habitat benefits. International Journal of River Basin Management, 12(1), 43–55.CrossRef

Zeng, Y., Cai, Y., Jia, P., & Jee, H. (2012). Development of a web-based decision support system for supporting integrated water resources management in Daegu city, South Korea. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10091–10102.CrossRef

Zhang, J. X., Wu, J. Q., Chang, K., Elliot, W. J., & Dun, S. (2009). Effects of DEM source and resolution on WEPP hydrologic and erosion simulation: A case study of two forest watersheds in northern Idaho. Transactions of the ASABE, 52(2), 447–457.CrossRef

Zhang, D., Chen, X., & Yao, H. (2015). Development of a prototype web-based decision support system for watershed management. Water, 7, 780–793.

Titel: Geomatics and Water Policy
verfasst von: Wanhong Yang
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Water Policy and Governance in Canada
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42805-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-42806-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42806-2_23

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"