Abstract
Companies act today in a collaborative way, and have to master their product design and supervision processes to remain productive and reactive to the perpetual changes in the industrial context. To achieve this, authors propose a three-layers framework. In the first layer, the design process is modelled. In the second, the traces related to the decisional process are captured. In the third, both the collected traces and the design context model are used to support decision-making. In this paper, authors address the first two issues by proposing a meta-model that allows one to capture the process’ decisional knowledge. The proposal is presented and then illustrated in a case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Berliner and J. A. Brimson, Cost Management for Today’s Advanced Manufacturing: The CAM-I Conceptual Design. Harvard Business School Press, 1988.
L. Roucoules, E. Yahia, W. Es-Soufi, and S. Tichkiewitch, “Engineering design memory for design rationale and change management toward innovation,” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2016.
J. A. Zachman, “A Framework for Information Systems Architecture,” IBM Syst. J., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 276–292, Sep. 1987.
P. Nowak, B. Rose, L. Saint-Marc, M. Callot, B. Eynard, L. Gzara-Yesilbas, and M. Lombard, “Towards a design process model enabling the integration of product, process and organization,” in 5th International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, IDMME, 2004, pp. 5–7.
M. Ouertani, L. Gzara-Yesilbas, and G. Ris, “A Process Traceability Methodology to Support Conflict Management,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on CSCW in Design, CSCWD 2006, May 3-5, 2006, pp. 471–476.
P. Couturier, M. Lô, A. Imoussaten, V. Chapurlat, and J. Montmain, “Tracking the consequences of design decisions in mechatronic Systems Engineering,” Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 763 – 774, 2014.
E. Moones, E. Yahia, and L. Roucoules, “Design process and trace modelling for design rationale capture,” in Joint Conference on Mechanical, Design Engineering & Advanced Manufacturing, 2014.
M. Labrousse and A. Bernard, “FBS-PPRE, an enterprise knowledge lifecycle model,” in Methods and tools for effective knowledge life-cycle-management, Springer, 2008, pp. 285–305.
F. Daoudi and S. Nurcan, “A benchmarking framework for methods to design flexible business processes,” Software Process: Improvement and Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2007.
O. M. G., “Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0,” Jan. 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Es-Soufi, W., Yahia, E., Roucoules, L. (2017). Collaborative Design and Supervision Processes Meta-Model for Rationale Capitalization. In: Eynard, B., Nigrelli, V., Oliveri, S., Peris-Fajarnes, G., Rizzuti, S. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing . Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_112
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_112
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45780-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45781-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)