Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to the First Issue of FoMaC Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Collective Autonomic Systems: Towards Engineering Principles and Their Foundations

verfasst von : Lenz Belzner, Matthias Hölzl, Nora Koch, Martin Wirsing

Erschienen in: Transactions on Foundations for Mastering Change I

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Collective autonomic systems (CAS) are adaptive, open-ended, highly parallel, interactive and distributed software systems. They consist of many collaborative entities that manage their own knowledge and processes. CAS present many engineering challenges, such as awareness of the environmental situation, performing suitable and adequate adaptations in response to environmental changes, or preserving adaptations over system updates and modifications. Recent research has proposed initial solutions to some of these challenges, but many of the difficult questions remain unanswered and will open up a rich field of future research.
In an attempt to initiate a discussion about the structure of this emerging research area, we present eight engineering principles that we consider promising candidates for relevant future research, and shortly address their possible foundations. Our discussion is based on a development life cycle (EDLC) for autonomic systems. Going beyond the traditional iterative development process, the EDLC proposes three control loops for system design, runtime adaptation, as well as feedback between design- and runtime. Some of our principles concern the whole development process, while others focus on a particular control loop.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Statistical Model Checking with Change Detection
Nächstes Kapitel Continuous Collaboration for Changing Environments
Literatur
1.
Abeywickrama, D., Bicocchi, N., Zambonelli, F.: SOTA: towards a general model for self-adaptive systems. In: 2012 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), pp. 48–53, June 2012
2.
Lemos, R., et al.: Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: a second research roadmap. In: Lemos, R., Giese, H., Müller, H.A., Shaw, M. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II. LNCS, vol. 7475, pp. 1–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-35813-5_​1 CrossRef
3.
Alexander, J.M.: Evolutionary game theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Fall 2009 edn. (2009)
4.
5.
Bijani, S., Robertson, D.: A review of attacks and security approaches in open multi-agent systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 42(4), 607–636 (2014)CrossRef
6.
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
7.
8.
Borgers, T., Krahmer, D., Strausz, R.: An Introduction to the Theory of Mechanism Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)CrossRef
9.
Briggs, R.: Normative theories of rational choice: expected utility. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, fall 2014 edn. (2014)
10.
Browne, C.B., Powley, E., Whitehouse, D., Lucas, S.M., Cowling, P., Rohlfshagen, P., Tavener, S., Perez, D., Samothrakis, S., Colton, S., et al.: A survey of monte carlo tree search methods. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 4(1), 1–43 (2012)CrossRef
11.
Brun, Y., et al.: Engineering self-adaptive systems through feedback loops. In: Cheng, B.H.C., Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. LNCS, vol. 5525, pp. 48–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-02161-9_​3 CrossRef
12.
Bruni, R., Corradini, A., Gadducci, F., Hölzl, M., Lafuente, A.L., Vandin, A., Wirsing, M.: Reconciling white-box and black-box perspectives on behavioural self-adaptation. In: Wirsing et al. [68]
13.
Bruni, R., Corradini, A., Gadducci, F., Lluch Lafuente, A., Vandin, A.: A conceptual framework for adaptation. In: Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) FASE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 240–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-28872-2_​17 CrossRef
14.
15.
Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.H.: Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRef
16.
Cheng, B.H.C., et al.: Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: a research roadmap. In: Cheng, B.H.C., Lemos, R., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. LNCS, vol. 5525, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-02161-9_​1 CrossRef
17.
Clark, C., Storkey, A.: Training deep convolutional neural networks to play go. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1766–1774 (2015)
18.
Special Issue of the Journal for Cognitive Systems Research: Stigmergy 3.0: From Ants to Economics. Elsevier, March 2013
19.
Connelly, B.L., Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D., Reutzel, C.R.: Signaling theory: a review and assessment. J. Manag. 37(1), 39–67 (2011)
20.
21.
Criminisi, A., Shotton, J., Konukoglu, E.: Decision Forests: A Unified Framework for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation Manifold Learning and Semi-supervised Learning. Now, Breda (2012)MATH
22.
23.
Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2003)MATH
24.
Deng, L., Seltzer, M.L., Yu, D., Acero, A., Mohamed, A.r., Hinton, G.E.: Binary coding of speech spectrograms using a deep auto-encoder. In: Interspeech, pp. 1692–1695. Citeseer (2010)
25.
26.
Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Social trust: a cognitive approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.-H. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 55–90. Springer, Netherlands (2001)CrossRef
27.
28.
29.
Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18(7), 1527–1554 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
30.
Hölzl, M., Gabor, T.: Continuous collaboration for changing environments. In: Steffen, B. (ed.) Transactions on FoMaC I. LNCS, vol. 9960, pp. 201–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-46508-1_​11
31.
Hölzl, M., Gabor, T.: Reasoning and learning for awareness and adaptation. In: Wirsing et al. [68]
32.
Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Puviani, M., Wirsing, M., Zambonelli, F.: The ensemble development life cycle and best practises for collective autonomic systems. In: Wirsing et al. [68]
33.
Hölzl, M., Wirsing, M.: Issues in engineering self-aware and self-expressive ensembles. In: Pitt, J. (ed.) The Computer After Me: Awareness and Self-awareness in Autonomic Systems. Imperial College Press, London (2014)
34.
Hölzl, M., Wirsing, M.: Towards a system model for ensembles. In: Agha, G., Danvy, O., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Formal Modeling: Actors, Open Systems, Biological Systems: Essays Dedicated to Carolyn Talcott on the Occasion of her 70th Birthday. LNCS, vol. 7000, pp. 241–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-24933-4_​12 CrossRef
35.
36.
Inverardi, P., Mori, M.: A software lifecycle process to support consistent evolutions. In: Lemos, R., Giese, H., Müller, H.A., Shaw, M. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II. LNCS, vol. 7475, pp. 239–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-35813-5_​10 CrossRef
37.
Jolliffe, I.: Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Online Library, New York (2002)MATH
38.
39.
Jung, Y., Kim, M., Masoumzadeh, A., Joshi, J.B.: A survey of security issue in multi-agent systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 37(3), 239–260 (2012)CrossRef
40.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)CrossRefMATH
41.
Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)MATH
42.
43.
Keznikl, J., Bures, T., Plasil, F., Gerostathopoulos, I., Hnetynka, P., Hoch, N.: Design of ensemble-based component systems by invariant refinement. In: Proceedings of the 16th International ACM Sigsoft symposium on Component-based software engineering, CBSE 2013, pp. 91–100. ACM, New York (2013)
44.
Koch, N.: ASCENS: autonomic service-component ensembles (brochure), February 2015
45.
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)
46.
van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements engineering in the year 00: a research perspective. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2000), pp. 5–19. ACM (2000)
47.
Lee, H., Battle, A., Raina, R., Ng, A.Y.: Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 801–808 (2006)
48.
Legay, A., Delahaye, B., Bensalem, S.: Statistical model checking: an overview. In: Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Finkbeiner, B., Havelund, K., Lee, I., Pace, G., Roşu, G., Sokolsky, O., Tillmann, N. (eds.) RV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6418, pp. 122–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-642-16612-9_​11 CrossRef
49.
50.
Millington, I.: Game Physics Engine Development. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam (2007)
51.
52.
53.
Pharr, M., Humphreys, G.: Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2004)
54.
Pinyol, I., Sabater-Mir, J.: Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 40(1), 1–25 (2013)CrossRef
55.
Pitt, J., Busquets, D., Bourazeri, A., Petruzzi, P.: Collective intelligence and algorithmic governance of socio-technical systems. In: Miorandi, D., Maltese, V., Rovatsos, M., Nijholt, A., Stewart, J. (eds.) Social Collective Intelligence. Computational Social Sciences, pp. 31–50. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014). doi:10.​1007/​978-3-319-08681-1_​2
56.
Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (1994)CrossRefMATH
57.
Rasmussen, C.E.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2006)MATH
58.
Scott, W.R.: The adolescence of institutional theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 32(4), 493–511 (1987)CrossRef
59.
Sen, K., Viswanathan, M., Agha, G.: On statistical model checking of stochastic systems. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 266–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.​1007/​11513988_​26 CrossRef
60.
Shoham, Y., Leyton-Brown, K.: Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)CrossRefMATH
61.
62.
Thrun, S., Burgard, W., Fox, D.: Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2005)MATH
63.
Weibull, J.W.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)MATH
64.
65.
Weiss, G. (ed.): Multiagent Systems, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2013)
66.
Wirsing, M., Hölzl, M., Koch, N., Mayer, P. (eds.): Software Engineering for Collective Autonomic Systems. LNCS, vol. 8998. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
67.
68.
Metadaten
Titel
Collective Autonomic Systems: Towards Engineering Principles and Their Foundations
verfasst von
Lenz Belzner
Matthias Hölzl
Nora Koch
Martin Wirsing
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Transactions on Foundations for Mastering Change I

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46507-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-46508-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46508-1_10