Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Establishing ‘Architectural Thinking’ in Organizations Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Scaffolding Stakeholder-Centric Enterprise Model Articulation

verfasst von : Stefan Oppl, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers

Erschienen in: The Practice of Enterprise Modeling

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Involving stakeholders in enterprise modeling, besides rendering valid models, also helps stakeholders articulate and align their views on their organization. This requires that stakeholders are able to understand and actively perform conceptual modeling for representing their views on enterprise structure and behavior. The specific skills required for this should not be taken for granted and need to be developed explicitly. Scaffolding is an educational concept that allows to embed learning support mechanisms in operative modeling processes. The present article introduces a framework that makes it possible to view scaffolding as an integral part of stakeholder-centric modeling activities. The framework is validated with respect to its descriptive and discriminatory power by an ex-post analysis of the design and application of an existing modeling method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Semi-automated Method for Capturing Consumer Preferences for System Requirements
Nächstes Kapitel An Artifact-Based Framework for Business-IT Misalignment Symptom Detection
Literatur
1.
Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling. Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
2.
Insfrán, E., Pastor, Ó., Wieringa, R.: Requirements engineering-based conceptual modelling. Requir. Eng. 7, 61–72 (2002)CrossRef
3.
Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data Knowl. Eng. 58, 358–380 (2006)CrossRef
4.
Heemskerk, M., Wilson, K., Pavao-Zuckerman, M.: Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conserv. Ecol. 7, 8 (2003)
5.
Morris, W.T.: On the art of modeling. Manag. Sci. 13, B–707–B–717 (1967)CrossRef
6.
Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Elicitation approaches in enterprise modeling. In: Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M. (eds.) Enterprise Modeling. The Enterprise Engineering Series, pp. 39–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
7.
Willemain, T.R.: Model formulation: what experts think about and when. Oper. Res. 43, 916–932 (1995)CrossRef
8.
Tavella, E., Papadopoulos, T.: Expert and novice facilitated modelling: a case of a viable system model workshop in a local food network. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66, 247–264 (2014)CrossRef
9.
Recker, J.C., Safrudin, N., Rosemann, M.: How novices design business processes. Inf. Syst. 37, 557–573 (2012)CrossRef
10.
Powell, S.G., Willemain, T.R.: How novices formulate models. Part I: qualitative insights and implications for teaching. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58(8), 983–995 (2007)CrossRef
11.
Franco, L.A.: Rethinking soft OR interventions: models as boundary objects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231, 720–733 (2013)CrossRef
12.
Briggs, R.O., Kolfschoten, G.L., De Vreede, G.J., Lukosch, S., Albrecht, C.C.: Facilitator-in-a-box: process support applications to help practitioners realize the potential of collaboration technology. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 29, 159–194 (2013)CrossRef
13.
Hjalmarsson, A., Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M., Lind, M.: Understanding the behavior of workshop facilitators in systems analysis and design projects. CAIS 36, 421–447 (2015)
14.
Mayer, R.E.: Models for understanding. Rev. Educ. Res. 59(1), 43–64 (1989)CrossRef
15.
Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3, 36–59 (1992)CrossRef
16.
Strauss, A.: Continual Permutations of Action. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (1993)
17.
Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T.: Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 94–118 (2003)CrossRef
18.
Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G., Loser, K.U.: Modelling cooperative work: chances and risks of structuring. In: Proceedings of COOP 2002, pp. 53–70 (2002)
19.
Dix, A., Gongora, L.: Externalisation and design. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design (2011)
20.
Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., Obstfeld, D.: Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16, 409–421 (2005)CrossRef
21.
Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data Knowl. Eng. 58, 4–20 (2006)CrossRef
22.
Bider, I., Henkel, M., Kowalski, S., Perjons, E.: Technology enhanced learning of modeling skills in the field of information systems. In: Proceedings of 8th IADIS IS (2015)
23.
Stender, P., Kaiser, G.: Scaffolding in complex modelling situations. ZDM Math. Educ. 47, 1255–1267 (2015)CrossRef
24.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., Ross, G.: The role of tutoring in problem solving. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatr. 17, 89–100 (1976)CrossRef
25.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Beishuizen, J.: Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 271–296 (2010)CrossRef
26.
Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts (1978)
27.
Dennen, V.P.: Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook Res. Educ. Commun. Technol. 2, 813–828 (2004)
28.
Jumaat, N.F., Tasir, Z.: Instructional scaffolding in online learning environment: a meta-analysis. In: Proceedings of Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) (2014)
29.
Bulu, S.T., Pedersen, S.: Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 58, 507–529 (2010)CrossRef
30.
Su, J.-M.: A self-regulated learning tutor to adaptively scaffold the personalized learning: a study on learning outcome for grade 8 Mathematics. In: Proceedings of UMEDIA 2015 8th (2015)
31.
Fretz, E.B., Wu, H.-K., Zhang, B., Davis, E.A., Krajcik, J.S., Soloway, E.: An investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices. Res. Sci. Educ. 32, 567–589 (2002)CrossRef
32.
Sandkuhl, K., Lillehagen, F.: The early phases of enterprise knowledge modelling: practices and experiences from scaffolding and scoping. In: Stirna, J., Persson, A. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 15, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRef
33.
Carstensen, A., Holmberg, L., Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J.: Integrated requirements and solution modeling: an approach based on enterprise models. In: Innovations in Information Systems Modeling: Methods and Best Practices (2008)
34.
Oppl, S.: Towards scaffolding collaborative articulation and alignment of mental models. In: Proceedings of ICKM 2016 (2016)
35.
Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B.B.: From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design. Educ. Stud. Math. 79, 19–40 (2012)CrossRef
36.
Ozmantar, M.F., Roper, T.: Mathematical abstraction through scaffolding. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (2004)
37.
Land, S.M., Zembal-Saul, C.: Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: an investigation of progress portfolio. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 51, 65–84 (2003)CrossRef
38.
Abdu, R., Schwarz, B., Mavrikis, M.: Whole-class scaffolding for learning to solve mathematics problems together in a computer-supported environment. ZDM Math. Educ. 47, 1163–1178 (2015)CrossRef
39.
Chin, C., Osborne, J.: Students’ questions and discursive interaction: their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 883–908 (2010)CrossRef
40.
King, A., Rosenshine, B.: Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge construction. J. Exp. Educ. 61, 127–148 (1993)CrossRef
41.
Xun, G.E., Land, S.M.: A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52, 5–22 (2004)CrossRef
42.
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., Fischer, F.: Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1–35 (2016). doi:10.​1007/​s10648-016-9361-7
43.
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., Fischer, F.: Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 2, 211–224 (2007)CrossRef
44.
Oppl, S., Alexopoulou, N.: Linking natural modeling to techno-centric modeling for the active involvement of process participants in business process design. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. (IJISMD) 7(2), 1–30 (2016)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Scaffolding Stakeholder-Centric Enterprise Model Articulation
verfasst von
Stefan Oppl
Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48392-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-48393-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_10