Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Recent Advances in Opinion Modeling: Control and Social Influence

verfasst von : Giacomo Albi, Lorenzo Pareschi, Giuseppe Toscani, Mattia Zanella

Erschienen in: Active Particles, Volume 1

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We survey some recent developments on the mathematical modeling of opinion dynamics. After an introduction on opinion modeling through interacting multi-agent systems described by partial differential equations of kinetic type, we focus our attention on two major advancements: optimal control of opinion formation and influence of additional social aspects, like conviction and number of connections in social networks, which modify the agents’ role in the opinion exchange process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat D. Acemoglu, O. Asuman. Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1, 3–49, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef D. Acemoglu, O. Asuman. Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1, 3–49, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, M. Bongini, E. Cristiani, D. Kalise. Invisible control of self-organizing agents leaving unknown environments. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, to appear. G. Albi, M. Bongini, E. Cristiani, D. Kalise. Invisible control of self-organizing agents leaving unknown environments. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, to appear.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi. Modeling of self-organized systems interacting with a few individuals: from microscopic to macroscopic dynamics. Applied Mathematics Letters, 26: 397–401, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef G. Albi, L. Pareschi. Modeling of self-organized systems interacting with a few individuals: from microscopic to macroscopic dynamics. Applied Mathematics Letters, 26: 397–401, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi. Binary interaction algorithm for the simulation of flocking and swarming dynamics. SIAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulations, 11(1), 1–29, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef G. Albi, L. Pareschi. Binary interaction algorithm for the simulation of flocking and swarming dynamics. SIAM Journal on Multiscale Modeling and Simulations, 11(1), 1–29, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, M. Herty, L. Pareschi. Kinetic description of optimal control problems and applications to opinion consensus. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13(6): 1407–1429, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef G. Albi, M. Herty, L. Pareschi. Kinetic description of optimal control problems and applications to opinion consensus. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13(6): 1407–1429, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Boltzmann-type control of opinion consensus through leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20140138, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Boltzmann-type control of opinion consensus through leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20140138, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Uncertainty quantification in control problems for flocking models. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 14 pp., 2015. G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Uncertainty quantification in control problems for flocking models. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 14 pp., 2015.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. On the optimal control of opinion dynamics on evolving networks. IFIP TC7 2015 Proceedings, to appear Kinetic and Related Models, 10(1): 1–32, 2017. G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. On the optimal control of opinion dynamics on evolving networks. IFIP TC7 2015 Proceedings, to appear Kinetic and Related Models, 10(1): 1–32, 2017.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Opinion dynamics over complex networks: kinetic modeling and numerical methods. To appear in Kinetic and related models, 2016. G. Albi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella. Opinion dynamics over complex networks: kinetic modeling and numerical methods. To appear in Kinetic and related models, 2016.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Aletti, G Naldi, G. Toscani. First-order continuous models of opinion formation. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 67(3): 837–853, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef G. Aletti, G Naldi, G. Toscani. First-order continuous models of opinion formation. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 67(3): 837–853, 2007.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat L. A. N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Bathélemy, H.E. Stanley. Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21): 11149–11152, 2000.CrossRef L. A. N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Bathélemy, H.E. Stanley. Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(21): 11149–11152, 2000.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat D. Armbruster, C. Ringhofer. Thermalized kinetic and fluid models for re-entrant supply chains. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 3(4): 782–800, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef D. Armbruster, C. Ringhofer. Thermalized kinetic and fluid models for re-entrant supply chains. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 3(4): 782–800, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, H. Jeong. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 272(1): 173–187, 1999.CrossRef A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, H. Jeong. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 272(1): 173–187, 1999.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat N. Bellomo, G. Ajmone Marsan, A. Tosin. Complex Systems and Society. Modeling and Simulation. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, Springer, 2013. N. Bellomo, G. Ajmone Marsan, A. Tosin. Complex Systems and Society. Modeling and Simulation. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, Springer, 2013.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat N. Bellomo, J. Soler. On the mathematical theory of the dynamics of swarms viewed as complex systems. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(01): 1140006, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef N. Bellomo, J. Soler. On the mathematical theory of the dynamics of swarms viewed as complex systems. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(01): 1140006, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ben-Naim. Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties. Europhysics Letters, 69(5): 671, 2005.CrossRef E. Ben-Naim. Opinion dynamics: rise and fall of political parties. Europhysics Letters, 69(5): 671, 2005.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ben-Naim, P. L. Krapivski, S. Redner. Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 183(3): 190–204, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef E. Ben-Naim, P. L. Krapivski, S. Redner. Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 183(3): 190–204, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Ben-Naim, P. L. Krapivski, R. Vazquez, S. Redner. Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Physica A, 330(1–2): 99-106, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef E. Ben-Naim, P. L. Krapivski, R. Vazquez, S. Redner. Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Physica A, 330(1–2): 99-106, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat A. Bensoussan, J. Frehse, P. Yam. Mean field games and mean field type control theory. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, New York, NY: Springer, 2013.MATHCrossRef A. Bensoussan, J. Frehse, P. Yam. Mean field games and mean field type control theory. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, New York, NY: Springer, 2013.MATHCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat M. L. Bertotti, M. Delitala. On a discrete generalized kinetic approach for modeling persuader’s influence in opinion formation processes. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 48(7–8): 1107–1121, 2008.MATHCrossRef M. L. Bertotti, M. Delitala. On a discrete generalized kinetic approach for modeling persuader’s influence in opinion formation processes. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 48(7–8): 1107–1121, 2008.MATHCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Biswas. Mean-field solutions of kinetic-exchange opinion models. Physical Review E, 84(5), 056105, 2011.CrossRef S. Biswas. Mean-field solutions of kinetic-exchange opinion models. Physical Review E, 84(5), 056105, 2011.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Bongini, M. Fornasier, F. Rossi, F. Solombrino. Mean-Field Pontryagin Maximum Principle, preprint, 2015. M. Bongini, M. Fornasier, F. Rossi, F. Solombrino. Mean-Field Pontryagin Maximum Principle, preprint, 2015.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat C. M. Bordogna, E. V. Albano. Dynamic behavior of a social model for opinion formation. Physical Review E, 76(6): 061125, 2007.CrossRef C. M. Bordogna, E. V. Albano. Dynamic behavior of a social model for opinion formation. Physical Review E, 76(6): 061125, 2007.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat A. Borzì, S. Wongkaew. Modeling and control through leadership of a refined flocking system. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25(2): 255–282, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef A. Borzì, S. Wongkaew. Modeling and control through leadership of a refined flocking system. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25(2): 255–282, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. The quasi-invariant limit for a kinetic model of sociological collective behavior. Kinetic and Related Models: 433–449, 2009. L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. The quasi-invariant limit for a kinetic model of sociological collective behavior. Kinetic and Related Models: 433–449, 2009.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. A kinetic approach to the study of opinion formation. ESAIM: Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 43(3): 507–522, 2009.MathSciNetMATH L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. A kinetic approach to the study of opinion formation. ESAIM: Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Analysis, 43(3): 507–522, 2009.MathSciNetMATH
29.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(22): 5672–5684, 2012.CrossRef L. Boudin, F. Salvarani. Conciliatory and contradictory dynamics in opinion formation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(22): 5672–5684, 2012.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Boudin, R. Monaco, F. Salvarani. Kinetic model for multidimensional opinion formation. Physical Review E, 81(3): 036109, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRef L. Boudin, R. Monaco, F. Salvarani. Kinetic model for multidimensional opinion formation. Physical Review E, 81(3): 036109, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Brugna, G. Toscani. Kinetic models of opinion formation in the presence of personal conviction. Physical Review E, 92, 052818, 2015.CrossRef C. Brugna, G. Toscani. Kinetic models of opinion formation in the presence of personal conviction. Physical Review E, 92, 052818, 2015.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Buet, S. Dellacherie. On the Chang and Cooper numerical scheme applied to a linear Fokker-Planck equation. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 8(4): 1079–1090, 2010.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef C. Buet, S. Dellacherie. On the Chang and Cooper numerical scheme applied to a linear Fokker-Planck equation. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 8(4): 1079–1090, 2010.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Buet, S. Cordier, V. Dos Santos. A conservative and entropy scheme for a simplified model of granular media. Transport Theory and Statistical Physics, 33(2): 125–155, 2004.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef C. Buet, S. Cordier, V. Dos Santos. A conservative and entropy scheme for a simplified model of granular media. Transport Theory and Statistical Physics, 33(2): 125–155, 2004.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Burger, M. Di Francesco, P. A. Markowich, M.-T. Wolfram. Mean-field games with nonlinear mobilities in pedestrian dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 19(5): 1311–1333, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Burger, M. Di Francesco, P. A. Markowich, M.-T. Wolfram. Mean-field games with nonlinear mobilities in pedestrian dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 19(5): 1311–1333, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat E. F. Camacho, C. Bordons. Model Predictive Control, Springer–Verlag London, 2004.MATH E. F. Camacho, C. Bordons. Model Predictive Control, Springer–Verlag London, 2004.MATH
36.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Caponigro, M. Fornasier, B. Piccoli, E. Trélat. Sparse stabilization and optimal control of the Cucker-Smale model. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 3(4): 447–466, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Caponigro, M. Fornasier, B. Piccoli, E. Trélat. Sparse stabilization and optimal control of the Cucker-Smale model. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 3(4): 447–466, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Review of Modern Physics, 81(2): 591–646, 2009.CrossRef C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Review of Modern Physics, 81(2): 591–646, 2009.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat A. Chakraborti, B. K. Chakrabarti. Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution. European Physical Journal B, 17: 167-170, 2000.CrossRef A. Chakraborti, B. K.  Chakrabarti. Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution. European Physical Journal B, 17: 167-170, 2000.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat J. S. Chang, G. Cooper. A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Physics, 6: 1–16, 1970.MATHCrossRef J. S. Chang, G. Cooper. A practical difference scheme for Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Physics, 6: 1–16, 1970.MATHCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Choi, M. Hinze, K. Kunisch. Instantaneous control of backward-facing step flows. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 31(2): 133–158, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef H. Choi, M. Hinze, K. Kunisch. Instantaneous control of backward-facing step flows. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 31(2): 133–158, 1999.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat R. M. Colombo, N. Pogodaev. Confinement strategies in a model for the interaction between individuals and a continuum. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 11(2): 741–770, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef R. M. Colombo, N. Pogodaev. Confinement strategies in a model for the interaction between individuals and a continuum. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 11(2): 741–770, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat R. M. Colombo, N. Pogodaev. On the control of moving sets: positive and negative confinement results. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51(1): 380–401, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef R. M. Colombo, N. Pogodaev. On the control of moving sets: positive and negative confinement results. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51(1): 380–401, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat V. Comincioli, L. Della Croce, G. Toscani. A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation. Kinetic and Related Models, 2(1): 135–149, 2009. V. Comincioli, L. Della Croce, G. Toscani. A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation. Kinetic and Related Models, 2(1): 135–149, 2009.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Cordier, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. Journal of Statistical Physics, 120(1–2): 253–277, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef S. Cordier, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. Journal of Statistical Physics, 120(1–2): 253–277, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, N. R. Franks, S. A. Levin. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433(7025): 513–516, 2005.CrossRef I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, N. R. Franks, S. A. Levin. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433(7025): 513–516, 2005.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli, A. Tosin. Multiscale modeling of granular flows with application to crowd dynamics. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 9(1): 155–182, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli, A. Tosin. Multiscale modeling of granular flows with application to crowd dynamics. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 9(1): 155–182, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat N. Crokidakis. Role of noise and agents’ convictions on opinion spreading in a three-state voter-like model. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 07: P07008, 2013.CrossRef N. Crokidakis. Role of noise and agents’ convictions on opinion spreading in a three-state voter-like model. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 07: P07008, 2013.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat N. Crokidakis, C. Anteneodo. Role of conviction in nonequilibrium models of opinion formation. Physical Review E: 86(6): 061127, 2012.CrossRef N. Crokidakis, C. Anteneodo. Role of conviction in nonequilibrium models of opinion formation. Physical Review E: 86(6): 061127, 2012.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat F. Cucker, S. Smale. Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 52(5): 852–862, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRef F. Cucker, S. Smale. Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 52(5): 852–862, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat A. Das, S. Gollapudi, K. Munagala. Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks, Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, ACM New York, 403–412, 2014. A. Das, S. Gollapudi, K. Munagala. Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks, Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, ACM New York, 403–412, 2014.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, T. Faure. How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(4), 2002. G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, T. Faure. How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(4), 2002.
52.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Degond, S. Motsch. Continuum limit of self-driven particles with orientation interaction. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 18: 1193–1215, 2008.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef P. Degond, S. Motsch. Continuum limit of self-driven particles with orientation interaction. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 18: 1193–1215, 2008.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Degond, J.-G. Liu, S. Motsch, V. Panferov. Hydrodynamic models of self-organized dynamics: derivation and existence theory. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 20(2): 89–114, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef P. Degond, J.-G. Liu, S. Motsch, V. Panferov. Hydrodynamic models of self-organized dynamics: derivation and existence theory. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 20(2): 89–114, 2013.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Degond, J.-G. Liu, C. Ringhofer. Large-scale dynamics of mean-field games driven by local Nash equilibria. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 24(1): 93–115, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef P. Degond, J.-G. Liu, C. Ringhofer. Large-scale dynamics of mean-field games driven by local Nash equilibria. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 24(1): 93–115, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Dolfin, L. Miroslav. Modeling opinion dynamics: how the network enhances consensus. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 10(4): 877-896, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Dolfin, L. Miroslav. Modeling opinion dynamics: how the network enhances consensus. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 10(4): 877-896, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat M. D‘Orsogna, Y. L. Chuang, A. Bertozzi, L. Chayes. Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions. Patterns, stability and collapse. Physical Review Letters, 96: 104302, 2006. M. D‘Orsogna, Y. L. Chuang, A. Bertozzi, L. Chayes. Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions. Patterns, stability and collapse. Physical Review Letters, 96: 104302, 2006.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat B. Düring, M.-T. Wolfram. Opinion dynamics: inhomogeneous Boltzmann-type equations modeling opinion leadership and political segregation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 471(2182):20150345, 2015.CrossRef B. Düring, M.-T. Wolfram. Opinion dynamics: inhomogeneous Boltzmann-type equations modeling opinion leadership and political segregation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 471(2182):20150345, 2015.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat B. Düring, P. A. Markowich, J.-F. Pietschmann, M.-T. Wolfram. Boltzmann and Fokker-Planck equations modeling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 465(2112): 3687–3708, 2009.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef B. Düring, P. A. Markowich, J.-F. Pietschmann, M.-T. Wolfram. Boltzmann and Fokker-Planck equations modeling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 465(2112): 3687–3708, 2009.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Fornasier, F. Solombrino. Mean-field optimal control. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 20(4): 1123–1152, 2014. M. Fornasier, F. Solombrino. Mean-field optimal control. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 20(4): 1123–1152, 2014.
61.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Fornasier, J. Haskovec, G. Toscani. Fluid dynamic description of flocking via Povzner–Boltzmann equation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 240(1): 21–31, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Fornasier, J. Haskovec, G. Toscani. Fluid dynamic description of flocking via Povzner–Boltzmann equation. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 240(1): 21–31, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Fornasier, B. Piccoli, F. Rossi. Mean-field sparse optimal control, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20130400, 21, 2014. M. Fornasier, B. Piccoli, F. Rossi. Mean-field sparse optimal control, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20130400, 21, 2014.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Furioli, A. Pulvirenti, E. Terraneo, G. Toscani. The grazing collision limit of the inelastic Kac model around a Lévy-type equilibrium. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 44: 827–850, 2012.MATHCrossRef G. Furioli, A. Pulvirenti, E. Terraneo, G. Toscani. The grazing collision limit of the inelastic Kac model around a Lévy-type equilibrium. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 44: 827–850, 2012.MATHCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Galam, J. D. Zucker. From individual choice to group decision-making. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 287(3–4): 644–659, 2000.MathSciNetCrossRef S. Galam, J. D. Zucker. From individual choice to group decision-making. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 287(3–4): 644–659, 2000.MathSciNetCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Galam, Y. Gefen,Y. Shapir. Sociophysics: a new approach of sociological collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9: 1–13, 1982.MATHCrossRef S. Galam, Y. Gefen,Y. Shapir. Sociophysics: a new approach of sociological collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9: 1–13, 1982.MATHCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat J. Gómez-Serrano, C. Graham, J.-Y. Le Boudec. The bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sicneces, 22(02): 1150007, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef J. Gómez-Serrano, C. Graham, J.-Y. Le Boudec. The bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sicneces, 22(02): 1150007, 2012.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Y. Ha, E. Tadmor. From particle to kinetic and hydrodynamic descriptions of flocking. Kinetic and Related Models, 1: 415–435, 2008.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef S. Y. Ha, E. Tadmor. From particle to kinetic and hydrodynamic descriptions of flocking. Kinetic and Related Models, 1: 415–435, 2008.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat D. Helbing, S. Lämmer, J.-P. Lebacque. Self-organized control of irregular or perturbed network traffic. Optimal Control and dynamic games, Springer US: 239–274, 2005. D. Helbing, S. Lämmer, J.-P. Lebacque. Self-organized control of irregular or perturbed network traffic. Optimal Control and dynamic games, Springer US: 239–274, 2005.
69.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Herty, C. Ringhofer. Feedback controls for continuous priority models in supply chain management. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 11(2): 206–213, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Herty, C. Ringhofer. Feedback controls for continuous priority models in supply chain management. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 11(2): 206–213, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Herty, C. Ringhofer. Averaged kinetic models for flows on unstructured networks. Kinetic and Related Models, 4: 1081–1096, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Herty, C. Ringhofer. Averaged kinetic models for flows on unstructured networks. Kinetic and Related Models, 4: 1081–1096, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Herty, M. Zanella. Performance bounds for the mean–field limit of constrained dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems A, 37(4): 2023–2043, 2017. M. Herty, M. Zanella. Performance bounds for the mean–field limit of constrained dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems A, 37(4): 2023–2043, 2017.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Hegselmann, U. Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence, models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3), 2002. R. Hegselmann, U. Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence, models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5(3), 2002.
73.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Kristic, I. Kanellakopoulos, P. Kokotovic. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1995. M. Kristic, I. Kanellakopoulos, P. Kokotovic. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1995.
74.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Lallouache, A. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, B. K. Chakrabarti. Opinion formation in the kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry breaking transition. Physical Review E, 82: 056112, 2010.CrossRef M. Lallouache, A. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, B. K. Chakrabarti. Opinion formation in the kinetic exchange models: spontaneous symmetry breaking transition. Physical Review E, 82: 056112, 2010.CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat P.F. Lazarsfeld, B.R. Berelson, H. Gaudet. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan & Pierce 1944. P.F. Lazarsfeld, B.R. Berelson, H. Gaudet. The people’s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan & Pierce 1944.
76.
Zurück zum Zitat E. W. Larsen, C. D. Levermore, G. C. Pomraning, J. G. Sanderson. Discretization methods for one-dimensional Fokker-Planck operators. Journal of Computational Physics, 61: 359–390, 1985.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef E. W. Larsen, C. D. Levermore, G. C. Pomraning, J. G. Sanderson. Discretization methods for one-dimensional Fokker-Planck operators. Journal of Computational Physics, 61: 359–390, 1985.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat T. Lux, M. Marchesi. Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature, 397(6719): 498–500, 1999.CrossRef T. Lux, M. Marchesi. Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature, 397(6719): 498–500, 1999.CrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat D. Maldarella, L. Pareschi. Kinetic models for socio-economic dynamicsof speculative markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(3): 715–730, 2012.CrossRef D. Maldarella, L. Pareschi. Kinetic models for socio-economic dynamicsof speculative markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(3): 715–730, 2012.CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat D.Q. Mayne, H. Michalska. Receding horizon control of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 35(7): 814–824, 1990.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef D.Q. Mayne, H. Michalska. Receding horizon control of nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 35(7): 814–824, 1990.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat D.Q. Mayne, J.B. Rawlings, C.V. Rao, P.O.M. Scokaert. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6): 789–814, 2000.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef D.Q. Mayne, J.B.  Rawlings, C.V. Rao, P.O.M. Scokaert. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6): 789–814, 2000.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Michalska, D.Q. Mayne. Robust receding horizon control of constrained nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38(11): 1623–1633, 1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef H. Michalska, D.Q. Mayne. Robust receding horizon control of constrained nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 38(11): 1623–1633, 1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Mohammadi, A. Borzì. Analysis of the Chang-Cooper discretization scheme for a class of Fokker-Planck equations. Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 23(3): 271–288, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef M. Mohammadi, A. Borzì. Analysis of the Chang-Cooper discretization scheme for a class of Fokker-Planck equations. Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 23(3): 271–288, 2015.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Mudde. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRef C. Mudde. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Naldi, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences, Birkhauser, Boston, 2010.MATHCrossRef G. Naldi, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences, Birkhauser, Boston, 2010.MATHCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Pareschi, G. Russo. An introduction to Monte Carlo methods for the Boltzmann equation. ESAIM: Proceedings, EDP Sciences. Vol. 10: 35–75, 2001. L. Pareschi, G. Russo. An introduction to Monte Carlo methods for the Boltzmann equation. ESAIM: Proceedings, EDP Sciences. Vol. 10: 35–75, 2001.
89.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Interacting Multiagent Systems. Kinetic Equations and Monte Carlo Methods. Oxford University Press, 2013.MATH L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Interacting Multiagent Systems. Kinetic Equations and Monte Carlo Methods. Oxford University Press, 2013.MATH
90.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Wealth distribution and collective knowledge: a Boltzmann approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20130396, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef L. Pareschi, G. Toscani. Wealth distribution and collective knowledge: a Boltzmann approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028): 20130396, 2014.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Pareschi, P. Vellucci, M. Zanella. Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Application, 467: 201-217, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRef L. Pareschi, P. Vellucci, M. Zanella. Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Application, 467: 201-217, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat S. Patterson, B. Bamieh. Interaction-driven opinion dynamics in online social networks, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, ACM New York, 98–110, 2010 S. Patterson, B. Bamieh. Interaction-driven opinion dynamics in online social networks, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, ACM New York, 98–110, 2010
93.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation, vol. 18 of Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second ed., 1989. Methods of solution and applications. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck equation, vol. 18 of Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second ed., 1989. Methods of solution and applications.
94.
Zurück zum Zitat P. Sen. Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges. Physical Review E, 83(1): 016108, 2011.CrossRef P. Sen. Phase transitions in a two-parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges. Physical Review E, 83(1): 016108, 2011.CrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat E.D. Sontag. Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems, Springer Science, Vol. 6, Second Edition, 1998. E.D. Sontag. Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems, Springer Science, Vol. 6, Second Edition, 1998.
96.
Zurück zum Zitat S.H. Strogatz. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825): 268–276, 2001.CrossRef S.H. Strogatz. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825): 268–276, 2001.CrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat K. Sznajd–Weron, J. Sznajd. Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 11(6): 1157–1165, 2000.MATHCrossRef K. Sznajd–Weron, J. Sznajd. Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 11(6): 1157–1165, 2000.MATHCrossRef
98.
99.
Zurück zum Zitat F. Vazquez, P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner. Constrained opinion dynamics: freezing and slow evolution. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(3): L61, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef F. Vazquez, P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner. Constrained opinion dynamics: freezing and slow evolution. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 36(3): L61, 2003.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
100.
Zurück zum Zitat T. Vicsek, A. Zafeiris. Collective motion. Physics Reports, 517(3): 71–140, 2012.CrossRef T. Vicsek, A. Zafeiris. Collective motion. Physics Reports, 517(3): 71–140, 2012.CrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat C. Villani. On a new class of weak solutions to the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann and Landau equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 143(3): 273–307, 1998.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef C. Villani. On a new class of weak solutions to the spatially homogeneous Boltzmann and Landau equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 143(3): 273–307, 1998.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393: 440–442, 1998.CrossRef D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393: 440–442, 1998.CrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat W. Weidlich. Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 2000.MATH W. Weidlich. Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 2000.MATH
104.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard. Persuasion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 353: 555–575, 2005.CrossRef G. Weisbuch, G. Deffuant, F. Amblard. Persuasion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 353: 555–575, 2005.CrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Y.-B. Xie, T. Zhou, B.-H. Wang. Scale-free networks without growth. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387: 1683–1688, 2008.CrossRef Y.-B. Xie, T. Zhou, B.-H. Wang. Scale-free networks without growth. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387: 1683–1688, 2008.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Recent Advances in Opinion Modeling: Control and Social Influence
verfasst von
Giacomo Albi
Lorenzo Pareschi
Giuseppe Toscani
Mattia Zanella
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49996-3_2

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.