nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

13. Ontology Annotation for Software Engineering Project Management in Multisite Distributed Software Development Environments

verfasst von : Pornpit Wongthongtham, Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong, Syed Hassan Marzooq

Erschienen in: Software Project Management for Distributed Computing

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

There are chronic issues in multisite distributed software development which need to be addressed in order to take advantages of the resource pools and around-the-clock work with the time zone differences. One of the most daunting challenges is to address the issues relating to communication and coordination and the unnecessary project delays often caused by miscommunication and improper coordination. There are many more issues in multisite software development, and no single project can address them all, nor should it try to; otherwise the work will be shallow. The objective of this research is to facilitate the software development activities focusing on communication and coordination in multisite distributed software development environments. In this chapter, we present software engineering ontology annotation (SEOAnno), the automated process of assigning software engineering domain concepts to the development process of software products. The SEOAnno aims to clarify any ambiguity in remote communication. We deploy software engineering ontology (SE ontology) which can provide domain knowledge through an annotation process. For a proof-of-concept development, Java source code annotation is chosen because it is a common language and coding is centrally located and critical in multisite software development. The use of the SE ontology-based approach is illustrated and evaluated through a case study for software maintenance and evolution in multisite software development environment. The most complex though common activities in multisite software development environments require an awareness of highly diverse kinds of software artefacts and stakeholders distributed in different sites for the same project. Bug resolution is common yet a complex process for multisite software development. It involves the process of identifying, understanding, fixing a bug, and taking additional steps in order to avoid the recurrence of similar bugs in the future.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Improved Agile: A Customized Scrum Process for Project Management in Defense and Security

Nächstes Kapitel Investigating the Scope for Agile Project Management to Be Adopted by Higher Education Institutions

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/examples/start/HelloWorldSwingProject/src/start/HelloWorldSwing.java (visited Sept 2, 2016)

http://seontology.wix.com/seoanno

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/classes.html (visited Sept 2, 2016)

Wongthongtham P et al (2008) Development of a software engineering ontology for multi-site software development. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21:1205–1217CrossRef

Ågerfalk PJ et al (2005) A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development. In: Proceedings of the International workshop on distributed software development. Austrian Computer Society, Paris, 29 Aug 2005

Conchúir EÓ et al (2009) Global software development: where are the benefits? Commun ACM 52(8):127–131CrossRef

Islam S, Joarder MMA, Houmb SH (2009) Goal and risk factors in offshore outsourced software development from vendor’s viewpoint. Global Software Engineering, 2009. ICGSE 2009. Fourth IEEE International Conference on. Limerick, Ireland

Thissen MR et al (2007) Communication tools for distributed software development teams, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce. ACM, St. Louis, pp 28–35

Biehl JT et al (2008) Impromptu: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence, pp 939–948

Salinger S et al (2010) Saros: an eclipse plug-in for distributed party programming, Proceedings of the 2010 ICSE Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering. ACM, Cape Town, pp 48–55

Dillon TS, Chang E, Wongthongtham P (2008) Ontology-based software engineering- software engineering 2.0. In: Software Engineering, 2008. ASWEC 2008. 19th Australian Conference on. Perth, Australia

Blanco-Fernández Y et al (2008) A flexible semantic inference methodology to reason about user preferences in knowledge-based recommender systems. Knowl-Based Syst 21(4):305–320CrossRef

10.

Borges A et al (2013) Ontologies supporting the distributed software development: a systematic mapping study, Proceedings of the 17th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. ACM, Porto de Galinhas, pp 153–164

11.

Wongthongtham P et al (2006) Ontology-based multi-site software development methodology and tools. J Syst Archit 52(11):640–653CrossRef

12.

Bourque P (2003) SWEBOK guide call for reviewers. 29 May 2003. Available from: http://serl.cs.colorado.edu/~serl/seworld/database/3552.html

13.

Carmel E, Agarwal R (2001) Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. IEEE Softw 18(2):22–29CrossRef

14.

Herbsleb JD et al (2001) An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed. In: 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’01). Toronto, Canada

15.

Herbsleb JD, Moitra D (2001) Global software development. IEEE Softw 18:16–20CrossRef

16.

Boulton C (2008) IBM’s social beehive and discovery search. eWeek.com

17.

Giri K (2011) Role of ontology in semantic web. DESIDOC J Libr Inf Technol 31(2):116–120CrossRef

18.

Paydar S, Kahani M (2011) An agent-based framework for automated testing of web-based systems. J Softw Eng Appl 4:86–94CrossRef

19.

Portillo-Rodríguez J et al (2014) Using agents to manage socio-technical congruence in a global software engineering project. Inf Sci 264(0):230–259CrossRef

20.

Lee C-S, Wang M-H (2009) Ontology-based computational intelligent multi-agent and its application to CMMI assessment. Appl Intell 30(3):203–219CrossRef

21.

Nunes I et al (2011) On the development of multi-agent systems product lines: a domain engineering process, in agent-oriented software engineering X. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 125–139

22.

Chira C (2007) A multi-agent approach to distributed computing. Comput Intell:43–45

23.

Robillard M, Walker R, Zimmermann T (2010) Recommendation systems for software engineering. Softw IEEE 27(4):80–86CrossRef

24.

Ponzanelli L (2014) Holistic recommender systems for software engineering, Companion Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering. ACM, Hyderabad, pp 686–689

25.

Xin X et al (2013) Accurate developer recommendation for bug resolution. In: Reverse Engineering (WCRE), 2013 20th Working conference on. Koblenz, Germany

26.

Begel A, Yit Phang K, Zimmermann T (2010) Codebook: discovering and exploiting relationships in software repositories. In: Software Engineering, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd international conference on. Cape Town, South Africa

27.

Moraes A et al (2010) Recommending experts using communication history, Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on recommendation systems for software engineering. ACM, Cape Town, pp 41–45

28.

Steinmacher I, Wiese IS, Gerosa MA (2012) Recommending mentors to software project newcomers. In: Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE), 2012 third international workshop on. Zurich, Switzerland

29.

Xiang PF et al (2008) Ensemble: a recommendation tool for promoting communication in software teams, Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on recommendation systems for software engineering. ACM, Atlanta, pp 1–1

30.

Sawadsky N, Murphy GC (2011) Fishtail: from task context to source code examples, Proceedings of the 1st workshop on developing tools as plug-ins. ACM, Waikiki, pp 48–51

31.

Cordeiro J, Antunes B, Gomes P (2012) Context-based recommendation to support problem solving in software development. In: Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE), 2012 third international workshop on. Zurich, Switzerland

32.

Ashok B et al (2009) DebugAdvisor: a recommender system for debugging, Proceedings of the the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering. ACM, Amsterdam, pp 373–382

33.

Borges A et al (2013) Ontologies supporting the distributed software development: a systematic mapping study. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil

34.

Lim SL et al (2013) Using web 2.0 for stakeholder analysis: stakesource and its application in ten industrial projects. In: Maalej W, Thurimella AK (eds) Managing requirements knowledge. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–242CrossRef

35.

Lim SL, Quercia D, Finkelstein A (2010) StakeNet: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects, Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE international conference on software engineering, 1st edn. ACM, Cape Town, pp 295–304

36.

Liu L. et al. (2014) An ontology-based advisement approach for SOA design patterns. In: The 8th international conference on knowledge management in organizations. Springer, Dordrecht

37.

Ovaska P, Rossi M, Marttiin P (2003) Architecture as a coordination tool in multi-site software development. Softw Process: Improv Pract 8(4):233–247CrossRef

38.

Hass G (2003) Configuration management principles and practice. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co

39.

Gracia J, Mena E (2008) Web-based measure of semantic relatedness, Web Information Systems Engineering-WISE 2008. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 136–150

40.

Parsia B, Sirin E 2004 Pellet: an owl dl reasoner. In: Third international semantic web conference

41.

Ashraf J, Hussain OK, Hussain FK (2012) A framework for measuring ontology usage on the web. Comput J 56:1083–1101CrossRef

42.

Hepp M (2007) Possible ontologies: how reality constrains the development of relevant ontologies. Internet Comput 11(1):90–96CrossRef

43.

Brickley D, Miller L (2010) FOAF vocabulary specification 0.98. In: Namespace document. RDF and Semantic Web developer community. http://www.loeyeol.com/siteagent/xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20100809.html

44.

Weibel S et al (1998) Dublin core metadata for resource discovery. Internet Engineering Task Force. Network Working Group, pp 1–8

45.

Miles A, Bechhofer S (2009) SKOS simple knowledge organization system reference. Technical report, W3C

46.

Breslin JG et al (2005) Towards semantically-interlinked online communities, The semantic web: research and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 500–514

Titel: Ontology Annotation for Software Engineering Project Management in Multisite Distributed Software Development Environments
verfasst von: Pornpit Wongthongtham
Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong
Syed Hassan Marzooq
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Software Project Management for Distributed Computing
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54324-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-54325-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54325-3_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"