Abstract
This chapter presents the refined theory of basic values that provides greater heuristic and predictive power than the original theory. It partitions the circular value continuum into 19 values based on analyses of (a) the multifaceted definitions of some original values, (b) spaces in past MDS projections of items in samples from 83 countries, and (c) confirmatory factor analyses. This chapter explains the rationales for splitting seven of the original values and adding the new values of humility and face. It then describes the PVQ-RR, a new instrument for measuring the 19 values, which yields more reliable measures of the ten basic values and four higher orders in the same or less time than alternative methods. This chapter presents empirical evidence that individuals across cultures distinguish all 19 values. It then describes cross-cultural studies that illustrate the distinctive relations of the 19 values to socio-demographic, attitude, and behavior variables. The refined theory provides insights obscured by focusing only on the ten original values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Figure 2 in Cieciuch et al. (2014) shows conformity with an unexpected secondary loading on self-transcendence in addition to its primary loading on conservation. Conformity-interpersonal accounts for this. If it is allowed to have a secondary loading on self-transcendence, conformity loads only on conservation.
- 2.
I thank Sonia Roccas for this suggestion.
- 3.
Lebedeva et al. (submitted) combined humility and tradition values. I separated them and reran the analyses.
References
Bardi, A. (2000). Relations of values to behavior in everyday situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207–1220.
Beierlein, C., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Schwartz, S. H., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire items —A replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009). Survey Research Methods, 6, 25–36.
Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530.
Buss, D. M. (1994/2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). A hierarchical structure of basic human values in a third-order confirmatory factor analysis. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73, 177–182.
Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). The number of distinct basic values and their structure assessed by PVQ-40. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 321–328.
Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A. 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action. New York: Guilford.
Hutchison, E. (2011). Dimensions of human behavior: The changing life course. London: Sage.
Lebedeva, N., Schwartz, S. H., & Plucker, J. A. (submitted). Domains of everyday creativity and the personal values that underlie them.
Lönnqvist, J.-E., Leikas, S., Paunonen, S., Nissinen, V., & Verkasalo, M. (2006). Conformism moderates the relations between values, anticipated regret, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1469–1481.
Maio, G. R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 2–43).
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2010). Personal values and behavior: Taking the cultural context into account. Social and Personality Compass, 4, 31–41.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Sagiv, L., Sverdlik, N., & Schwarz, N. (2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values’ impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 64–77.
Saris, W. E., Knoppen, D., & Schwartz, S. H. (2013). Operationalizing the theory of human values: Balancing homogeneity of reflective items and theoretical coverage. Survey Research Methods, 7, 29–44.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (2005a). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizações [Values and behavior in organizations] (pp. 21–55). Petrópolis: Vozes.
Schwartz, S. H. (2005b). Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory of universals in individual human values. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), op. cit (pp. 56–95).
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249–288.
Schwartz, S. H. (2015). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In D. Sander & T. Brosch (Eds.), Handbook of value (pp. 63–84). Oxford: UK, Oxford University Press.
Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.
Schwartz, S. H., & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: Validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 719–813.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multi-method studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Torres, C., Dirilem-Gumus, O., & Butenko, T. (in press). Value tradeoffs and behavior in four countries: Validating 19 refined values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47.
Verkasalo, M., Tuomivaara, P., & Lindeman, M. (1996). 15-year-old pupils’ and their teachers’ values, and their belief about the values of an ideal pupil. Educational Psychology, 16, 35–47.
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: Evolutionary psychology and everyday life. London: Vintage.
Acknowledgements
This chapter was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of a subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwartz, S.H. (2017). The Refined Theory of Basic Values. In: Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. (eds) Values and Behavior. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56350-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56352-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)