Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Visual Decision Support System for Helping Physicians to Make A decision on New Drugs Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Multicriteria Decision Making for Healthcare Facilities Location with Visualization Based on FITradeoff Method

verfasst von : Marta Dell’Ovo, Eduarda Asfora Frej, Alessandra Oppio, Stefano Capolongo, Danielle Costa Morais, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida

Erschienen in: Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper proposes an application of the Flexible Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) method for siting healthcare facilities. The selection of the location of complex facilities, as hospitals, can be considered as a multidimensional decision problem for the several issues to be taken into account and, moreover, for the variety of stakeholders that should be involved. The case study under investigation is the location of “La Città della Salute”, a new large healthcare facility in Lombardy Region (Italy). Starting from a cross disciplinary literature review, a multidimensional evaluation framework has been defined and applied to the case study by considering the point of view of one Decision Maker (DM). The application shows that a smaller effort is required from the DM using the FITradeoff method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Automatic Traffic Enforcement Camera Operation, Based on a Business Intelligence System
Nächstes Kapitel Business Process Modelling and Visualisation to Support e-Government Decision Making: Business/IS Alignment
Literatur
1.
Keeney, R.L.: Make better decision makers. Decis. Anal. 1(4), 193–204 (2004)CrossRef
2.
Sharifi, M.A., Rodriguez, E.: Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resource rehabilitation. J. Hydroinformatics 4(3), 157–175 (2002)
3.
Capolongo, S., Buffoli, M., Oppio, A.: How to assess the effects of urban plans on environment and health. Territorio 73, 145–151 (2015)
4.
Daskin, M.S., Dean, L.K.: Location of Health Care Facilities, pp. 43–76. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston (2004)
5.
Burkey, M.L., Bhadury, J., Eiselt, H.A.: A location-based comparison of health care services in four U.S. states with efficiency and equity. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 46, 157–163 (2012)CrossRef
6.
Noon, C.E., Hankins, C.T.: Spatial data visualization in healthcare: supporting a facility location decision via gis-based market analysis. In: 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)
7.
Murad, A.A.: Using GIS for planning public general hospitals at Jeddah City. Environ. Des. Sci. 3, 3–22 (2005)
8.
Vahidnia, M.H., Alesheikh, A.A., Alimohammadi, A.: Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 3048–3056 (2009)CrossRef
9.
Soltani, A., Marandi, E.Z.: Hospital site selection using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 5, 2–43 (2011)CrossRef
10.
Wu, C.R., Lin, C.T., Chen, H.C.: Optimal selection of location for Taiwanese hospitals to ensure a competitive advantage by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Build. Environ. 42, 1431–1444 (2007)CrossRef
11.
Faruque, L.I., Ayyalasomayajula, B., Pelletier, R., Klarenbach, S., Hemmelgarn, B.R., Tonelli, M.: Spatial analysis to locate new clinics for diabetic kidney patients in the underserved communities in Alberta. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 4102–4109 (2012)CrossRef
12.
Chiu, J.E., Tsai, H.H.: Applying analytic hierarchy process to select optimal expansion of hospital location. In: 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, pp. 603–606 (2013)
13.
Abdullahi, S., Mahmud, A.R., Pradhan, B.: Spatial modelling of site suitability assessment for hospitals using geographical information system-based multicriteria approach at Qazvin city. Iran Geocarto Int. 29, 164–184 (2013)CrossRef
14.
Lee, K.S., Moon, K.J.: Hospital distribution in a metropolitan city: assessment by a geographical information system grid modelling approach. Geospatial Health 8, 537–544 (2014)CrossRef
15.
Beheshtifar, S., Alimoahmmadi, A.: A multiobjective optimization approach for location-allocation of clinics. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22, 313–328 (2015)CrossRef
16.
Zhang, P., Ren, X., Zhang, Q., He, J., Chen, Y.: Spatial analysis of rural medical facilities using huff model: a case study of Lankao county, Henan province. Int. J. Smart Home 9, 161–168 (2015)CrossRef
17.
Du, G., Sun, C.: Location planning problem of service centers for sustainable home healthcare: evidence from the empirical analysis of Shanghai. Sustainability 7, 15812–15832 (2015)CrossRef
18.
Kim, J.I., Senaratna, D.M., Ruza, J., Kam, C., Ng, S.: Feasibility study on an evidence-based decision-support system for hospital site selection for an aging population. Sustainability 7, 2730–2744 (2015)CrossRef
19.
Riabacke, M., Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation. Adv. Decis. Sci. 2012, 1–24 (2012)CrossRef
20.
Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision Analysis with Multiple Conflicting Objectives. Wiley & Sons, New York (1976)
21.
Weber, M., Borcheding, K.: Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67(1), 1–12 (1993)CrossRef
22.
Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60, 306–325 (1994)CrossRef
23.
Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., Von Winterfeldt, D.: Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Manag. Sci. 37(12), 1603–1619 (1991)CrossRef
24.
de Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 179–191 (2016)CrossRef
25.
Oppio, A., Buffoli, M., Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S.: Addressing decisions about new hospitals’ siting: a multidimensional evaluation approach. Ann. Ist. Super Sanità 52(1), 78–87 (2016)
26.
D’Alessandro, D., Buffoli, M., Capasso, L., Fara, G.M., Rebecchi, A., Capolongo, S.: Green areas and public health improving wellbeing and physical activity in the urban context. Epidemiol Prev. 39(5 Suppl 1), 8–13 (2015)
27.
Dente, B.: Understanding Policy Decisions. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, PoliMI SpringerBriefs. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRef
28.
Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S.: Architectures for health: between historical contexts and suburban areas. Tool to support location strategies. Techne 12, 269–276 (2016)
Metadaten
Titel
Multicriteria Decision Making for Healthcare Facilities Location with Visualization Based on FITradeoff Method
verfasst von
Marta Dell’Ovo
Eduarda Asfora Frej
Alessandra Oppio
Stefano Capolongo
Danielle Costa Morais
Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57486-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-57487-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_3