Skip to main content

Robot Transparency: Improving Understanding of Intelligent Behaviour for Designers and Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10454))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Autonomous robots can be difficult to design and understand. Designers have difficulty decoding the behaviour of their own robots simply by observing them. Naive users of robots similarly have difficulty deciphering robot behaviour simply through observation. In this paper we review relevant robot systems architecture, design, and transparency literature, and report on a programme of research to investigate practical approaches to improve robot transparency. We report on the investigation of real-time graphical and vocalised outputs as a means for both designers and end users to gain a better mental model of the internal state and decision making processes taking place within a robot. This approach, combined with a graphical approach to behaviour design, offers improved transparency for robot designers. We also report on studies of users’ understanding, where significant improvement has been achieved using both graphical and vocalisation transparency approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Design details and software for the R5 Robot: http://www.robwortham.com/r5- robot/.

  2. 2.

    The Instinct Planner and iVDL are available on an open source basis, see: http:// www.robwortham.com/instinct-planner/.

  3. 3.

    See: http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/.

References

  1. Arduino: Arduino Website (2016). https://www.arduino.cc/

  2. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boden, M., Bryson, J., Caldwell, D., Dautenhahn, K., Edwards, L., Kember, S., Newman, P., Parry, V., Pegman, G., Rodden, T., Sorell, T., Wallis, M., Whitby, B., Winfield, A.: Principles of robotics. The United Kingdom’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), April 2011. Web publication

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boden, M.A.: Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 103(1–2), 347–356 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brom, C., Gemrot, J., Bída, M., Burkert, O., Partington, S.J., Bryson, J.J.: POSH tools for game agent development by students and non-programmers. In: Mehdi, Q., Mtenzi, F., Duggan, B., McAtamney, H. (eds.) The Ninth International Computer Games Conference: AI, Mobile, Educational and Serious Games, pp. 126–133. University of Wolverhampton, November 2006

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brom, C., Gemrot, J., Michal, B., Ondrej, B., Partington, S.J., Bryson, J.J.: Posh tools for game agent development by students and non-programmers. In: The Nineth International Computer Games Conference: AI, Mobile, Educational and Serious Games, pp. 1–8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47(1), 139–159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bryson, J.: Cross-paradigm analysis of autonomous agent architecture. J. Exp. Theoret. Artif. Intell. 12(2), 165–189 (2000). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/095281300409829

  9. Bryson, J.J.: The study of sequential and hierarchical organisation of behaviour via artificial mechanisms of action selection. M. Phil., University of Edinburgh (2000). https://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/ftp/mphil.pdf

  10. Bryson, J.J.: Intelligence by design: principles of modularity and coordination for engineering complex adaptive agents. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Department of EECS, Cambridge, MA, AI Technical report 2001–2003, June 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bryson, J.J.: Advanced Behavior Oriented Design Environment (ABODE) (2013). http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~jjb/web/BOD/abode.html

  12. Bryson, J.J., Gaudl, S.: jyPOSH (2013). https://sourceforge.net/projects/jyposh/

  13. David, E.W., Karen, L.M., John, D.L., Wesley, L.P.: Planning and reacting in uncertain and dynamic environments. J. Exp. Theoret. Artif. Intell. 7(1), 121–152 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09528139508953802

  14. Finzi, A., Ingrand, F., Muscettola, N.: Model-based executive control through reactive planning for autonomous rovers. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), vol. 1, pp. 879–884 (2004). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1389463

  15. Fodor, J.A.: The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. A Bradford book. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1983). http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=e7nrSeibJZYC

  16. Gaudl, S., Bryson, J.J.: The extended ramp goal module: low-cost behaviour arbitration for real-time controllers based on biological models of dopamine cells. In: Computational Intelligence in Games 2014 (2014). http://opus.bath.ac.uk/40056/

  17. Gaudl, S., Davies, S., Bryson, J.: Behaviour oriented design for real-time-strategy games: an approach on iterative development for STARCRAFT AI. In: Foundations of Digital Games Conference, pp. 198–205 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lyons, J.B.: Being Transparent about transparency: a model for human-robot interaction. Trust and Autonomous Systems: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium, pp. 48–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minsky, M.: The Society of Mind. Simon and Schuster Inc., New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruckert, J.H., Kahn, P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., Gary, H.E.: Designing for sociality in HRI by means of multiple personas in robots. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 217–218 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sakagami, Y., Watanabe, R., Aoyama, C., Matsunaga, S., Higaki, N., Fujimura, K.: The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. 3(October), 2478–2483 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shingo, S., Dillon, A.P.: A Study of the Toyota Production System: From an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint. Produce What Is Needed, When It’s Needed. Taylor & Francis, New York (1989). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RKWU7WElJ7oC

  23. Theodorou, A.: ABOD3: a graphical visualization and real-time debugging tool for bod agents. In: EUCognition 2016, Vienna, Austria, December 2016. http://opus.bath.ac.uk/53506/

  24. Theodorou, A., Wortham, R., Bryson, J.J.: Designing and implementing transparency for real time inspection of autonomous robots. Connection Sci. 29 (2017). http://opus.bath.ac.uk/55250/

  25. Wortham, R.H., Gaudl, S.E., Bryson, J.J.: Instinct: a biologically inspired reactive planner for embedded environments. In: Proceedings of ICAPS 2016 PlanRob Workshop, London, UK (2016). http://icaps16.icaps-conference.org/proceedings/planrob16.pdf

  26. Wortham, R.H., Rogers, V.E.: The Muttering Robot: Improving Robot Transparency Though Vocalisation of Reactive Plan Execution (2017, in prep)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wortham, R.H., Theodorou, A.: Robot transparency, trust and utility. Connection Sci. 29(3), 242–248 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wortham, R.H., Theodorou, A., Bryson, J.J.: What does the robot think? Transparency as a fundamental design requirement for intelligent systems. In: IJCAI-2016 Ethics for Artificial Intelligence Workshop, New York, USA (2016). http://opus.bath.ac.uk/50294/1/WorthamTheodorouBryson_EFAI16.pdf

  29. Wortham, R.H., Theodorou, A., Bryson, J.J.: Improving robot transparency: real-time visualisation of robot AI substantially improves understanding in naive observers. In: IEEE RO-MAN 2017, Lisbon, Portugal (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Wortham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wortham, R.H., Theodorou, A., Bryson, J.J. (2017). Robot Transparency: Improving Understanding of Intelligent Behaviour for Designers and Users. In: Gao, Y., Fallah, S., Jin, Y., Lekakou, C. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64107-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64106-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64107-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics