nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

A Conceptual Model of Decision-Making Support for Opening Data

verfasst von : Ahmad Luthfi, Marijn Janssen

Erschienen in: E-Democracy – Privacy-Preserving, Secure, Intelligent E-Government Services

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The trend of open data has spread widely in the government nowadays. The motivation to create transparency, accountability, stimulate citizen engagement and business innovation are drivers to open data. Nevertheless, governments are all too often reluctant to open their data as there might be risks like privacy violating and the opening of inaccurate data. The goal of the research presented in this paper is to develop a model for decision-making support for opening data by weighing potential risks and benefits using Bayesian belief networks. The outcomes can be used to mitigate the risks and still gain benefits of opening data by taking actions like the removing privacy-sensitive data from dataset. After the taking of actions the process can start over again and the risks and benefits can be weighed again. The iteration can continue till the resulting dataset can be opened. This research uses health patient stories dataset as an illustration of the iterative process. This shows how the decision-making support can help to open more data by decomposing datasets.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel “I Have Learned that I Must Think Twice Before…”. An Educational Intervention for Enhancing Students’ Privacy Awareness in Facebook

Nächstes Kapitel Monitoring Media Scrutiny of EU Official Information and Documentation. A Content Analysis of the European Online News Coverage (January–May 2017)

Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Towards decision support for disclosing data: closed or open data? Inform. Polity 20(2–3), 103–107 (2015)CrossRef

Conradie, P., Choenni, S.: On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov. Inform. Q. 31(Suppl. 1), S10–S17 (2014)CrossRef

Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., David, C.: Innovation with open data: essential elements of open data ecosystems. Inform. Polity 19(2–3), 17–33 (2014)

Kulk, S., Loenen, B.V.: Brave new open data world? Int. J. Spatial Data Infrasructure Res. 7, 196–206 (2012)

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inform. Syst. Manage. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)CrossRef

Grimmelikhujsen, S.G., Meijer, A.J.: Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment. J. Public Adm. Res. Theor. 24(1), 137–157 (2014)CrossRef

Meijer, A., Thaens, M.: Public information strategies: making government information available to citizens. Inform. Polity 14(1–2), 31–45 (2009)

Barry, E., Bannister, F.: Barriers to open data release: a view from the top. Inform. Polity 19(1–2), 129–152 (2014)

Martin, S., et al.: Risk analysis to overcome barriers to open data. Electron. J. e-Government 11(1), 348–359 (2013)

10.

van Veenstra, A.F., van den Broek, T.A.: Opening moves – drivers, enablers and barriers of open data in a semi-public organization. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 50–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_5 CrossRef

11.

Puron-Cid, G., Gil-Garcia, R.J., Luna-Reyes, L.F.: IT-enabled policy analysis: new technologies, sophisticated analysis and open data for better government decisions. In: 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 97–106. ACM Digital Library, College Park (2012)

12.

Albano, C.S., Reinhard, N.: Open government data: facilitating and motivating factors for coping with potential barriers in the Brazilian context. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Bannister, F. (eds.) EGOV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8653, pp. 181–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_15

13.

Yannoukakou, A., Araka, I.: Access to government information: right to information and open government data synergy. In: 3rd International Conference on Integrated Information (IC-ININFO), vol. 147, pp. 332–340 (2014)

14.

Gurstein, M.: Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, 16(2) (2011). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3316/2764

15.

Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Grimmes, J.M.: Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov. Inform. Q. 27(3), 264–271 (2010)CrossRef

16.

Manyika, J., et al.: Open data: unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information (2013)

17.

Barnickel, N., et al.: Berlin Open Data Strategy: organisational, legal and technical aspects of Open Data in Berlin. In: Concept, Pilot System and Recommendations for Action (2012)

18.

Chen, D., Zhao, H.: Data security and privacy protection issues in cloud computing. In: International Conference and Privacy Protection Issues in Cloud Computing, pp. 647–651. IEEE Computer Society, Hangzhou (2012)

19.

Archer, P., et al.: Business models for Linked Open Government Data: what lies beneath? (2013)

20.

Walter, S.: Heterogeneous database integration in biomedicine. J. Biomed. Inform. 34(4), 285–298 (2001)CrossRef

21.

Amit, S.P., Larson, J.A.: Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput. Surv. 22(3), 183–236 (1990)CrossRef

22.

Uhlir, P.F.: The Socioeconomic Effects of Public Sector Information on Digital Networks: Toward a Better Understanding of Different Access and Reuse Policies. National Research Council, Washington DC (2009)

23.

Turner, P.: Unification of digital evidence from disparate sources. In: The Digital Forensic Research Conference, New Orleans, LA (2005)

24.

Bayan, R.: Simple strategies to stop data leakage. TechRepublic (2004)

25.

Scasa, T.: Privacy and open government. J. Future Internet 6(2), 397–413 (2014)CrossRef

26.

Tran, E., Scholtes, G.: Open Data Literature Review. Barkeley School of Law, University of California (2015)

27.

Han, J., et al.: Personalized active service spaces for end-user service composition. In: International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2006). IEEE Computer Society (2006)

28.

Aldossary, S., Allen, W.: data security, privacy, availability and integrity in cloud computing: issues and current solutions. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(4), 485–498 (2016)

29.

Catteddu, D.: Cloud computing: benefits, risks and recommendations for information security. In: Serrão, C., Aguilera Díaz, V., Cerullo, F. (eds.) IBWAS 2009. CCIS, vol. 72, p. 17. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16120-9_9 CrossRef

30.

Aljahdali, H., et al.: Multi-tenancy in cloud computing. In: 2014 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering (SOSE). IEEE, Oxford (2014)

31.

Hashizume, K., Rosado, D.G., Fernández-Medina, E.: An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. J. Internet Serv. Appl., 4(5) (2013)

32.

Puddephatt, A., Zausmer, R.: Towards open and transparent government. In: International Experiences and Best Practice. Global Partners and Associates (2011)

33.

Kucera, J., Chlapek, D.: Benefits and risks of open data. J. Syst. Integr. 1, 30–41 (2014)CrossRef

34.

Schwegmann, C.: Open data in developing countries. In: European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No. 2013/02 (2012)

35.

Turban, E., Aronson, J.E., Liang, T.-P.: Decision Support System and Intelligent System. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)

36.

Little, J.D.C.: Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus. Manage. Sci. 16(8), 466–485 (1976)CrossRef

37.

Bonczek, R.H., Holsapple, C., Whinston, A.: The evolving roles of models in decision support system. Decis. Sci. 11(2), 337–356 (1980)CrossRef

38.

Murphy, K.: A Brief Introduction to Graphical Models and Bayesian Networks (1998)

39.

Neopolitan, R.E.: Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Northeastern Illinois University (2004)

40.

Horný, M.: Bayesian Networks, in Technical report No. 5. 2014, Department of Health Policy & Management: Boston University School of Public Health (2014)

41.

Spiegelhalter, D.J.: Bayesian graphical modelling: a case-study in monitoring health outcomes. Royal Stat. Soc. 47(1), 115–133 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNet

42.

Kenett, R.S.: Applications of Bayesian networks to operational risks, healthcare, biotechnology and customer surveys. In: 22nd Colombian Statistics Symposium, Bucaramanga (2012)

43.

Pearl, J., Russel, S.: Bayesian networks. In: Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Cambridge, pp. 157–160 (2001)

44.

Sprites, P., Glymour, C., Schienes, R.: Causation Prediction and Search. Carnegie Mellon University, Springer, New York (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9 CrossRef

45.

Ubaldi, B.: Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. In: OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, vol. 22, p. 60 (2013)

46.

Kostkova, P., et al.: Who owns the data? Open data for healthcare. Frontiers Public Health 4(7), 1–6 (2016)

47.

Bøttcher, S.G., Dethlefsen, C.: Learning Bayesian Networks with R. Vienna University of Technology: Department of Mathematical Science, Aalborg University Denmark (2003)

48.

Spooner, L.M., Pesaturo, K.A.: Chapter 1: The Medical Record (2013)

49.

Ozair, F.F., et al.: Ethical issues in electronic health records: a general overview. Perspect. Clin. Res. 6(2), 73–76 (2015)CrossRef

50.

Abernethy, A.: Real World Evidence: Opportunities and Challenges. Flatiron Health (2016)

Titel: A Conceptual Model of Decision-Making Support for Opening Data
verfasst von: Ahmad Luthfi
Marijn Janssen
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: E-Democracy – Privacy-Preserving, Secure, Intelligent E-Government Services
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71116-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-71117-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"