Skip to main content

New Areas of Commercial Banking Directed at Vulnerable People: Payday Lending and Mobile Banking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Financial Resilience
  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 3 presents an analysis of commercial-based finance and credit schemes most notably payday lending and mobile banking. The chapter begins with an analysis of the motives, politics, and ethical considerations of commercial engagement, via credit and finance schemes, with vulnerable people. Commercial motivations for providing credit and finance are, by definition commercial, to generate profit, revenue, and/or market share. These motivations create challenges, from an ethical perspective, when asymmetric power (of banks as compared with vulnerable people) enables the bank to take advantage of the consumer. The chapter digs deeply, through results from research undertaken by the author and colleagues into payday lending and mobile banking. It finds that payday lending in the Global North, particularly Canada and the United States, can harm vulnerable people if the payday lenders rely on repeat borrowers. Mobile banking, particularly in Kenya and Bangladesh, has focused on money transfers, and the evidence is that, in this limited form, it can marginally assist vulnerable people. If mobile banking is linked with small loan schemes, then the outcome might change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An annual interest rate is a tool to present the full cost of a credit product for a one-year period. Providing the interest rate in this form allows the person to compare different credit products. In some cases loans are for one year so that the interest rate presented by the creditor is an annual rate. In other cases the loan is for longer than one year, for instance, a large loan or a mortgage, and once again, it is helpful to provide the borrower with the annual interest rate. In many cases of credit for vulnerable people, the credit term is for less than one year, for instance, pawn loan or payday loan. Again, to enable comparing prices across products, an annual interest rate is helpful.

  2. 2.

    Annual percentage rate, APR , is a formula that enables the conversion of an interest rate for a short term into an interest rate for an annual term. This allows the prospective borrower to compare credit products of different durations such as a payday loan and a credit card. APR is a linear and non-compounding method using a formula akin to the following: APR = (loan fees/loan principal) (365/12). Effective annual rate, EAR, is another formula to convert term interest rates into annual interest rates and involves compounding. It involves a formula akin to the following: EAR = [((loan principal + loan fees)/loan principal)(365/T)—1][100%].

  3. 3.

    Economic thinking and policy are partly responsible for this confusion. Neoclassical economics is the dominant or orthodox theory in the economics discipline today. This school of thought focuses on increasing efficiency or boosting economic growth and encompasses many central assumptions, and it regards markets as the most effective means to organize much of the economic realm, with the role of the state and civil society as being secondary. Neoclassical economic theory informs economic policy, that is, the rules, regulations, and laws that govern economic interaction. The dominant economic policy today is neoliberalism, dominating most of the world. (North Korea is an exception, and China embraces some but not all aspects.) The orthodox approach applies limited thought to the relationship between economic and human goals, Amartya Sen being an important exception. Sandel notes that the scope of the economics discipline has expanded in the last 30 to 40 years, and this is an important indicator of financialization. He notes that a key textbook in economics in the 1960s was Paul Samuelson’s Economics and that in the 1958 edition it defined economics, relative to today, narrowly, with a focus on “prices, wages, interest rates, stocks and bonds, banks and credit, taxes and expenditure” (Sandel 2012, p. 84). Sandel notes that the scope of economics has dramatically expanded today as evidenced in Greg Mankiw’s, a prominent economist today, expansive definition, “An economy is just a group of people interacting with one another as they go about their lives” (Sandel 2012, p. 85). Further evidence is the rise of the use of the word incentive that was rarely used in economics in the past but is now common fashion in economics and popular culture. According to Sandel the use of the term increased by over 400% between the 1940s and the 1990s (Sandel 2012, p. 86).

  4. 4.

    The microcredit literature has tended to downplay ethical issues. However, there is a small body of literature that examines ethical issues, including high interest rates, damaged social relations within borrowing circles, and stressed intra-family gender relations. These points will be dealt with in Chap. 4.

  5. 5.

    A finance professor colleague with expertise in consumer finance and payday lending was presented with a payday loan contract and reported being “baffled’” by it. I certainly could not understand the contract. If that was our experience, imagine how a typical low-income consumer feels.

  6. 6.

    There is an interesting circle of ethical critique. Critics of poverty finance might themselves be critiqued for “blaming the business”, that is, blaming the creditor even though he/she may simply be operating a business. For instance, in interviewing a pawnbroker, I shared with him the critique that pawnshops were charging excessive fees for loans to very poor people. His response was that he was simply running a business and that in comparison, mainstream banks were earning much higher profits and were therefore more exploitative. There is also the counter-critique of fringe bank consumers that says they are making unwise decisions and that their use of fringe banks is their own fault. Interestingly, I have heard mainstream bankers voice this notion when asked about the existence of payday lending. This is sometimes referred to as blaming the victim. A more general ethical critique is that it is not the borrower or the lender but the system that is exploitative. In this case, the borrower may be doing her best, and the lender may be doing his best, but because of structural inequalities the borrower is harmed or helped much less than the lender.

  7. 7.

    In Canada the automation of banking accelerated in the 1980s (Brennan et al. 2011). Automation was one trend, and, second, banks reduced and consolidated their branch networks. There is evidence in some cities in Canada that this branch network rollback process led to a particular decline of branches in low-income neighborhoods.

  8. 8.

    International remittances are a growing feature of the global economy, and it is estimated that they were valued at $401 billion in 2012 and intra-country remittances (from urban to rural, etc.) were valued at “several times more than that” (World Bank 2014, p. 55). The use of remittances, according to the World Bank, holds the potential to foster financial inclusion.

  9. 9.

    In interviews that I have done with low-income people in Canada, I find it significant that often respondents will not distinguish between what I refer to as mainstream, fringe, or informal financial service providers. For these respondents, there is little difference between the types of banks, and the issue is simply the different types of services they provide.

  10. 10.

    An excellent source of material on informal financial services in the Global South is the book Portfolios of the Poor by Daryl Collins et al. (2009). It is a book that distills key insights from an intensive panel research methodology called the financial diaries. This methodology carefully tracks participants’ income, spending, saving, and dissaving over the course of an entire year and was undertaken with poor people in Bangladesh, India, and South Africa.

  11. 11.

    Islam and historical Judaism share prohibitions on interest charges. Within the Jewish tradition there is even a resolution to debt-led impoverishment: the year of jubilee takes place every 49 to 50 years and involves returning land that had been lost—for example, sold off to pay off debt—to its original owner.

  12. 12.

    Where did the market for fringe financial services come from? One theory is that fringe banks have expanded into the market previously controlled by informal financial service providers such corner stores offering check-cashing services and bars offering credit services. A second theory is that the fringe bank market opened up when mainstream banks consolidated their branch networks and services and pulled out of many low-income neighborhoods. The truth probably encompasses elements of both of these points, recognizing that payday lenders offer services to modest middle-income customers who are credit constrained. So consumerism is a factor that should be kept in mind.

  13. 13.

    The rent-to-own model is a little different in that it is associated with directly linking consumer purchase with a loan option.

  14. 14.

    For instance, National Money Mart Inc. and Western Union Canada and Western Union Canada, Scotiabank, and BMO/Interac

  15. 15.

    “Developmental” services include savings, investments, mortgages, credit repair, and credit building.

  16. 16.

    Cash America claims to be one of the largest pawnbrokers in the United States, offering services through a number of names and has grown by 260 outlets in the last five years, for a total of 943 outlets in 2014 (Cash America 2015, pp. 2–3). Its main service is pawnbroking, but it also offers second-hand sales, payday loans, check cashing, money wiring, and so on. It recently sold off its pawn locations in Mexico and formed a new company, Enova, to run its online payday lending services. In 2014 Cash America’s pawn loans were over six times the amount as its consumer loans (p. 36). The company operates 7% of pawnshop outlets in the United States, with a total of 14,000 pawn outlets in the country. In its latest 10-K report, it noted that it continues to “de-emphasize” non-pawn “consumer lending” in order to focus on pawn loans (p. 39).

  17. 17.

    Until 2013 DFC Global and its forerunners were publicly traded US corporations that regularly reported to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Since Lone Star Funds purchased it, these data are no longer available.

  18. 18.

    This section is based on research completed by Jerry Buckland and Iqbal Ahmed Chowdhury (2015).

  19. 19.

    Alternatives to bKash include other mobile bankers like Dutch-Bangla Bank, but these respondents have no experience with that bank.

  20. 20.

    Clients were charged Tk 20 to send Tk 1000, but some of them understood that this charge was rounded up from the official charge of Tk 18.50 per Tk 1000. Clients understood that if they were to send their funds via their mobile phone to the recipient’s mobile phone, the fee would increase by Tk 5, for a total of Tk 23.50.

  21. 21.

    Other options for wiring money include the post office money order which, according to some respondents is cheaper, at Tk 12 to send Tk 1000, but slower as it takes up to one week for the money to reach its destination. Money courier is another option which is fast but costly at Tk 63 to send Tk 1000. The clients have also used an informal system to send money. This system requires more elaborate planning, or a coincidence of interests, and is particularly useful if several neighbors or family members are sending money from the same location to the same home destination. The arrangement is that one community member takes the money home for the group.

Bibliography

  • “The Mobile Money Revolution is Transforming Bangladesh Global Voices”. 2015. Accessed August 5, 2015. http://globalvoicesonline.org/2015/01/08/the-mobile-money-revolution-is-transforming-bangladesh/

  • “China’s SMEs Head for Pawnbrokers as Credit Tightens”. 2014. Accessed January 23, 2018. http://www.chinaeconomicreview.com/china-sme-lending-shadow-banking-pawnshop-credit

  • “The Economist Explains: Why China is Creating a New “World Bank” for Asia”. 2014. The Economist. Accessed April 27, 2015. http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/11/economist-explains-6

  • “The Economist Explains: Why does Kenya Lead the World in Mobile Money?”. 2015. The Economist. Accessed July 6, 2016. http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/05/economist-explains-18

  • Andreasen, Alan R. 1975. The Disadvantaged Consumer. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai, Bhavna. 2010. E-Banking Management: Impact, Risks, Security. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management 1 (6, Oct.): 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, Marianne, and Adair Morse. 2011. Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases, and Payday Borrowing. Journal of Finance 66 (6, Dec.): 1865–1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, Marianne, Sendhil Mullainathan, Dean Karlan, Eldar Shafir, and Jonathan Zinman. 2009. What’s Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment. Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Better than Cash Alliance. 2015. The Journey Toward ‘Cash Lite’: Addressing Poverty, Saving Money and Increasing Transparency by Accelerating the Shifts to Electronic Payments: Better than Cash Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • bKash: Making Remittances Easier in Bangladesh | CGAP. 2015. Anonymous a.

    Google Scholar 

  • bKash. 2015. Home | bKash. Accessed August 5, 2015. http://www.bkash.com/

  • BRAC Bank Limited. Knowing BRAC Bank ‘Company Profile’ Shareholding Structure. Accessed May 8, 2015. http://www.bracbank.com/Shareholding-Structure.php

  • Brennan, Marilyn, Brian McGregor, and Jerry Buckland. 2011. The Changing Structure of Inner-City Retail Banking: Examining Bank Branch and Payday Loan Outlet Locations in Winnipeg, 1980–2009. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 20 (1, Summer): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, Jerry. 2009. Affordable Credit Options for Vulnerable Consumers: Identifying Alternatives to High-Cost Credit in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, & the US. Ottawa: Office of Consumer Affairs/Industry Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Hard Choices: Financial Exclusion, Fringe Banks, and Poverty in Urban Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, Jerry, and Iqbal Ahmed Chowdhury. 2015. Managing Mobile Banking to Address the Needs and Protect the Vulnerability of Poor People in Bangladesh: SSRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvinic, Mayra, and Rebecca Furst-Nichols. 2014. Promoting Women’s Economic Empowerment: What Works? The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series: 7087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplovitz, David. 1967. The Poor Pay More: Consumer Practices of Low-Income Families. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Michael J. 2012. The Unfair Trade: How Our Broken Global Financial System Destroys the Middle Class. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash America International. 2015. Form 10-K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caskey, John P. 1994. Fringe Banking: Check-Cashing Outlets, Pawnshops, and the Poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Selina Ching, and David T. Owyong. 2010. Pawnshops in Singapore: Traditional Microfinance in a Modern Society. In Routledge Studies in the Growth Economies of Asia, ed. Aditya Goenka and David Henley, 84–94. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandran, Nyshka. 2015. Can Bitcoin Help the World’s Unbanked? Accessed July 8, 2015. http://www.cnbc.com/id/102720768

  • Chen, Greg. 2014. bKash Bangladesh: What Explains its Fast Start? | CGAP. Accessed July 7, 2015. http://www.cgap.org/blog/bkash-bangladesh-what-explains-its-fast-start

  • Chowdhry, Bhagwan. 2015. Show Me the (New) Money. Zocalo Public Square + » Show Me the (New) Money, Mon, 29 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggan, Philip. 2012. Paper Promises: Money, Debt and the New World Order. London: Allen Lane; Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Daryl, Jonathan Morduch, Stuart Rutherford, and Orlanda Ruthven. 2009. Portfolios of the Poor: How the World’s Poor Live on $2 a Day. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corr, Caroline. 2007. Alternative Financial Credit Providers in Europe. Brussels: Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunity, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danubrata, Eveline, and Khettiya Jittapong. 2013. Pawnshops Hit Paydirt as Southeast Asians Sweat before Pay Day | Reuters. Accessed July 8, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-asia-pawnshopsidUSBRE98908520130910

  • Dawson, William Harbutt. 1913. Municipal Pawnshops. The Economic Journal 13 (50): 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFC Global Corporation. 2008. Form 10-K. Berwyn, IL: DFC Global Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Form 10-K.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Form 10-K. Berwyn: DFC Global Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncombe, Richard. 2012. An Evidence-Based Framework for Assessing the Potential of Mobile Finance in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies 50 (3, Sep.): 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easyhome. 2014. Annual Report. Mississauga: Easyhome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Anna, Tony Dignan, Rob Forster, and Claire Whyley. 2010. Interim Evaluation of the National Illegal Money Lending Projects. London: Policis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Niall. 2008. The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goenka, Aditya, and David Henley, eds. 2010. Southeast Asia’s Credit Revolution: From Moneylenders to Microfinance. Routledge Studies in the Growth Economies of Asia. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Carol, and Milena Nikolova. 2013. Does Access to Information Technology Make People Happier? Insights from Well-being Surveys from Around the World. Journal of Socio-Economics 44 (June): 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Tavia, and Janet McFarland. 2015. Payday Loans: Predatory Loan Sharks Or Crucial Fix in a Pinch?—The Globe and Mail. Accessed July 27, 2015. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/payday-loans-predatory-loan-sharks-or-crucial-fix-in-a-pinch/article24463029/

  • Graves, Steven M. 2003. Landscapes of Predation, Landscapes of Neglect: A Location Analysis of Payday Lenders and Banks. The Professional Geographer 55 (3): 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerold, V.A. 2008. Financial Inclusion and Literacy in India—A Critical Study. Indian Journal of Finance 2 (3, July): 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Simon, and James Kwak. 2010. 13 Bankers: The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Oliver, and Benjamin Wilhelm. 2013. Financialization and the Three Utopias of Shadow Banking. Competition and Change 17 (3): 248–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jean. 2014. Bangladesh’s bKash Adoption Puzzle | Financial Access Initiative. Accessed August 5, 2015. http://www.financialaccess.org/blog/2014/04/bangladesh’s-bkash-adoption-puzzle

  • Leyshon, Andrew, Shaun French, and Paola Signoretta. 2008. Financial Exclusion and the Geography of Bank and Building Society Branch Closure in Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (4): 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, Bruce. 2012. Thieves of Bay Street. Toronto: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Christopher, Catherine. 2015. Mobile Banking: The Answer for the Unbanked in America? Catholic University Law Review 65: 221–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Robert. 2003. Payday Loans and Exploitation. Public Affairs Quarterly 17 (3): 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbiti, Isaac, and David N. Weil. 2011. Mobile Banking: The Impact of M-Pesa in Kenya. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Papers: 17129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, Katherine, Michelle Kaffenberger, and Jamie M. Zimmerman. 2015. Doing Digital Finance Right. Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poorest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money Max. 2015. Money Max Home Page. https://moneymax.com.sg/

  • Moore, Holly. 2014. Rent-to-Own Practices in Canada would be Illegal in Parts of U.S.—Manitoba—CBC News. Accessed June 8, 2015. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/rent-to-own-practices-in-canada-would-be-illegalin-parts-of-u-s-1.2850023

  • Packman, Carl. 2014. Payday Lending: Global Growth of the High-Cost Credit Market. Palgrave Pivot 1st ed., 2014 ed. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packman, Carl, ed. 2016. A Short History of Payday Lending. Vol. 81. http://www.historyworkshop.org.uk/a-short-history-of-payday-lending/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parada, Marcia, and Great Bull. 2014. In the Fast Lane: Innovations in Digital Finance. Toronto: The Mastercard Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. 2012. Who Borrows, Where They Borrow, and Why: Payday Lending in America. Pew Center on the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayid, Osman, Abdelghani Echchabi, and Hassanuddeen A. Aziz. 2012. Investigating Mobile Money Acceptance in Somalia: An Empirical Study. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 6 (2): 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharwatt, Claire, Arunjay Katakam, Jennifer Frydrych, Alix Murphy, and Nika Naghavi. 2014. 2014 State of the Industry: Mobile Financial Services for the Unbanked. London: Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, GSMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Wayne, and Dana Bazarkulova. 2013. Payday Loans Consumer Profile Based on the 2009 Canada Financial Capabilities Survey. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Wayne, and Jerry Buckland. 2016. The Dynamics of Financial Institution Location in Toronto: Who is Serving the Inner City? Economic Development Quarterly: 1–29. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Guy, and Monique Cohen. 2011. Cash in, Cash Out Kenya: The Role of M-PESA in the Lives of Low-Income People. Washington, DC: Microfinance Opportunities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman, Nor Surilawana Hj, Siti Fatimah Kassim, Ibrahim Alzoubi, Khaled Ashaboul, and Mashitah Zainol Abidin. 2014. The Comparison between Ar-Rahnu and Conventional Pawn Broking. Global Business and Economics Research Journal 3 (5): 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobbin, Peter. 2012. The Adoption of ‘Transformational Mobile Banking’ by the Unbanked: An Exploratory Field Study. Communications and Strategies 86: 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, Michael P., and Stephen C. Smith. 2015. Economic Development. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. 2015. Human Development Report. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uppal, R.K. 2012. M-Banking Services—A Milestone for Customers. International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research 3 (11, Nov.): 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaithilingam, Santha, Mahendhiran Nair, and Balachandher Krishnan Guru. 2013. Do Trust and Security Matter for the Development of M-Banking? Evidence from a Developing Country. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 14 (1): 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Beat. 2016. Bitcoin and the Legitimacy Crisis of Money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (1, Jan.): 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2014. Global Financial Development Report 2014: Financial Inclusion. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Ann Shawing. 2009. Exploring Adoption Difficulties in Mobile Banking Services. Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De l’Administration/Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 26 (2, June): 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelowitz, Aaron, and Matthew Wilson. 2015. Characteristics of Bitcoin Users: An Analysis of Google Search Data. Applied Economics Letters 22 (13–15): 1030–1036.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buckland, J. (2018). New Areas of Commercial Banking Directed at Vulnerable People: Payday Lending and Mobile Banking. In: Building Financial Resilience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72419-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72418-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72419-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics