Skip to main content

Solving Inconsistencies in Probabilistic Knowledge Bases via Inconsistency Measures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10751))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In most knowledge-based systems, the guarantee of consistency is one of the essential tasks to ensure them to avoid the trivial cases. Because of this reason, a wide range of approaches has been proposed for restoring consistency. However, these approaches often correspond to logical, or probabilistic-logical framework. In this paper, we investigate a model for restoring the consistency of probabilistic knowledge bases by focusing on the method of changing the probabilities in such knowledge bases. To this aim, a process to restore the consistency based on inconsistency measures is introduced, a set of rational and intuitive axioms to characterize the restoring operators is proposed, and several logical properties are investigated and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nguyen, N.T.: Advanced Methods for Inconsistent Knowledge Management. Springer, London (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-889-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Finthammer, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Ritterskamp, M.: Resolving inconsistencies in probabilistic knowledge bases. In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 114–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74565-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bona, G.D.: Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sao Paulo (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kern-Isberner, G. (ed.): Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44600-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Muiño, D.: Measuring and repairing inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(6), 828–840 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Potyka, N.: Linear programs for measuring inconsistency in probabilistic logics. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2014, pp. 568–577. AAAI Press ©2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thimm, M.: Measuring inconsistency in probabilistic knowledge bases. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2009), pp. 530–537. AUAI Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thimm, M.: Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics. Artif. Intell. 197, 1–24 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, V.T., Tran, T.H.: Inconsistency measures for probabilistic knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of KSE 2017, pp. 156–161. IEEE Xplore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/kse.2017.8119450

  10. Hansson, S.O.: A Textbook of Belief Dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0814-3. pp. 5, 3, 11, 35, 51-55, 69, 107

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter, A., Konieczny, S.: Measuring inconsistency through minimal inconsistent sets. In: Proceedings of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2008), pp. 358–366. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marques-Silva, J.: Minimal unsatisfiability: models, algorithms and applications. In: Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL), pp. 9–14. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liffiton, M.H., Sakallah, K.A.: On finding all minimally unsatisfiable subformulas. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 173–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinov, P.: Practical reasoning in probabilistic description logic. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Potyka, N.: Solving reasoning problems for probabilistic conditional logics with consistent and inconsistent information. Ph.D. thesis, FernUniversitat, Hagen (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Potyka, N., Thimm, M.: Consolidation of probabilistic knowledge bases by inconsistency minimization. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2014, pp. 729–734. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Potyka, N., Thimm, M.: Probabilistic reasoning with inconsistent beliefs using inconsistency measures. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2015 (IJCAI 2015), pp. 3156–3163. AAAI Press ©2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Professor Quang Thuy Ha, Faculty of Information Technology, Hanoi University of Engineering and Technology, Vietnam and Professor Ngoc Thanh Nguyen, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland for their expertise support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Van Tham Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nguyen, V.T., Tran, T.H. (2018). Solving Inconsistencies in Probabilistic Knowledge Bases via Inconsistency Measures. In: Nguyen, N., Hoang, D., Hong, TP., Pham, H., Trawiński, B. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10751. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75417-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75417-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75416-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75417-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics