Skip to main content

Pedagogical Support for Collaborative Development of Virtual and Remote Labs: Amrita VLCAP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineering and Science Education

Abstract

There is an explosive growth in e-Learning platforms, jointly developed by multiple institutions, which provide for virtual learning content. However, many are inadequate to support the complex requirements for collaborative development of distributed learning such as accommodation of wide-ranging technologies, servers, and remote equipment controlled by diverse software. Our solution is a multi-tier architecture that supports collaborative development, publishing in various online and print formats, security, audit, and access controls. Our design considerations include a highly scalable platform, use of open technologies, templates that provide pedagogical structure, multilingual functionality, and shared virtual availability of lab equipment from multiple geographic locations, along with secure access to remote equipment.

Our platform, VLCAP (Virtual Labs Collaboration and Accessibility Platform), provides structure yet flexibility to all users, includin developers, educators, and students. It offers extensive pedagogical support to lab developers in structuring the learning environment yet provides learners with a similar look and feel despite varying technologies used in the building of the labs. The learning environment consists of screens or tabs associated with various aspects of pedagogy such as conceptual background and theory, procedures, video demonstrations, animations, mathematically accurate simulations, and online access to remote equipment as well as learning assessment tools. This allows learners to systematically master conceptual, procedural, experimental, and reporting skills. Lab developers may tailor both the order and the presentation style to suit various teaching styles as well as diverse student needs.

VLCAP is currently being used to drive two nationwide ICT projects under the Digital India initiative – Online Labs (OLabs) for school education and Virtual Labs for higher education. We include examples from OLabs and the remote triggered wireless sensor network lab (RT WSN Lab) to demonstrate the pedagogical structure available for lab developers to build effective environments for learners. Today VLCAP has over 350,000 registered learners and a few million unregistered users from around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achuthan, K., Bose, L. S., Francis, S., Sreelatha, K. S., Sreekala, C. O., Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2014). Improving perception of invisible phenomena in undergraduate physics education using ICT. In Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 2014 2nd International Conference on (pp. 226–231). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. C. (2006). Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(4), 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochicchio, M. A., & Longo, A. (2009). Hands-on remote labs: Collaborative web laboratories as a case study for it engineering classes. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfora, G., Daponte, P., & Rapuano, S. (2004). Remotely accessible laboratory for electronic measurement teaching. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 26(6), 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., & Ferreira, J. M. (2009). Remote laboratories extending access to science and engineering curricular. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., & Chassapis, C. (2004). Remote versus hands-on labs: A comparative study. 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Cary, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doddavenkatappa, M., Chan, M. C., & Ananda, A. L. (2011). Indria: A low cost. 3d wireless sensor network testbed. In International conference on testbeds and research infrastructures (pp. 302–316).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. M., & Cardoso, A. M. (2005). A Moodle extension to book online labs. In Proceedings of the 2nd Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation International Symposium (REV 05).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Nagarajan, A., Parangan, M., Kumar, D., Diwakar, S., & Achuthan, K. (2012). Remote triggered photovoltaic solar cell lab: Effective implementation strategies for Virtual Labs. In Technology Enhanced Education (ICTEE), 2012 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1–7). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, I., Nilsson, K., Zackrisson, J., Garcia-Zubia, J., Hernandez-Jayo, U., Nafalski, A., & Lago, T. (2009). On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handziski, V., Köpke, A., Willig, A., & Wolisz, A. (2006). TWIST: A scalable and reconfigurable testbed for wireless indoor experiments with sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Multi-hop ad hoc networks: From theory to reality (pp. 63–70). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harward, V. J., Del Alamo, J. A., Lerman, S. R., Bailey, P. H., Carpenter, J., DeLong, K., & Long, P. D. (2008). The iLab shared architecture: A web services infrastructure to build communities of internet accessible laboratories. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(6), 931–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellbrück, H., Pagel, M., Köller, A., Bimschas, D., Pfisterer, D., & Fischer, S. (2011). Using and operating wireless sensor network testbeds with WISEBED. In Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), 2011. The 10th IFIP Annual Mediterranean (pp. 171–178). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutzel, W. J. (2002). A remotely accessed HVAC laboratory for distance education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(6), 711–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran, M., Said, A. M., & Hasbullah, H. (2010). A survey of simulators, emulators and testbeds for wireless sensor networks. In Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in (Vol. 2, pp. 897–902). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephsen, J., & Kristensen, A. K. (2006). Simulation of laboratory assignments to support students’ learning of introductory inorganic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollöffel, B., & de Jong, T. (2013). Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: Combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual lab. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, L. (1998). Using Addie to design a web-based training interface. In S. McNeil, J. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 1998 (pp. 452–455). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J., & Nickerson J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 38(3), Article 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhaney, K. W., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 745–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, B., Krishnan, R., Nizar, N., Radhamani, R., Rajan, K., Yoosef, A., & Diwakar, S. (2012). Role of ICT-enabled visualization-oriented virtual laboratories in universities for enhancing biotechnology education–VALUE initiative: Case study and impacts. FormaMente, 7(1–2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., & Nafalski, A. (2003). Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education (Vol. 1, pp. T3E-T3E). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2010, August). Effectiveness of adaptive learning with interactive animations and simulations. In Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), 2010 3rd International Conference on (Vol. 6, pp. V6–40). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2016). The Medical Virtual Patient Simulator (MedVPS) platform. In Intelligent systems technologies and applications (pp. 59 –67). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., Haridas, M., & Raman, R. (2015). Blending concept maps with Online Labs (OLabs): Case study with biological science. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Women in Computing and Informatics. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., Malini, P., & Raman, R. (2015). Inquiry based learning pedagogy for chemistry practical experiments using OLabs. In Advances in intelligent informatics (pp. 633–642). Cham: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, P., Raman, R., & McGregor, M. (2013). Enhanced STEM learning with Online Labs: Empirical study comparing physical labs, tablets and desktops. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE (pp. 1585–1590). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, D., & Odbert, B. (2011). The advantages of remote labs in engineering education. Educator’s Corner-Agilent Technologies-application note, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradeep, P., Divya, P., Devi, R. D. A., Rekha, P., Sangeeth, K., & Ramesh, M. V. (2015). A remote triggered wireless sensor network testbed. Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS), 2015, 1–7. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., Achuthan, K., & Diwakar, S. (2011). Integrating collaboration and accessibility for deploying virtual labs using vlcap. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 2(5), 547–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Diwakar, S., & Bose, R. (2014). The VLAB OER experience: Modeling potential-adopter student acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(4), 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, R., Haridas, M., & Nedungadi, P. (2015). Blending concept maps with online labs for STEM learning. In Advances in intelligent informatics (pp. 133–141). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, T., Boehringer, D., & Jeschke, S. (2011). Lila: A European project on networked experiments. In Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010 (pp. 307–317). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojko, A., Debevc, M., & Hercog, D. (2009). Implementation, effectiveness and experience with remote laboratory in engineering education. Organizacija, 42(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangeeth, K., Pradeep, P., Divya, P., Rekha, P., Sheeja, L., & Ramesh, M. V. (2015). A remote code editing framework for AMRITA remote triggered WSN laboratory. 5th International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS), (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, N., Alves, G. R., & Gericota, M. G. (2010). An integrated reusable remote laboratory to complement electronics teaching. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Hsu, H. (2009). Using the ADDIE model to design second life activities for online learners. TechTrends, 53(6), 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, C. P. (2008). Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the physics by inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature. American Journal of Physics, 76(4&5), 425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our project is envisioned, inspired, and actively guided by Amrita University’s Chancellor Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi. We acknowledge the support of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) and Ministry of Human Resources (MHRD), respectively, for the funding of Online Labs and Virtual Labs projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prema Nedungadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nedungadi, P., Ramesh, M.V., Pradeep, P., Raman, R. (2018). Pedagogical Support for Collaborative Development of Virtual and Remote Labs: Amrita VLCAP. In: Auer, M., Azad, A., Edwards, A., de Jong, T. (eds) Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineering and Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76935-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76935-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76934-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76935-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics