Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Exploration of New-Generation Human Computer Interface Based on Participatory Design Strategy Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Assist Users to Straightaway Suggest and Describe Experienced Problems

verfasst von : Björn Senft, Holger Fischer, Simon Oberthür, Nitish Patkar

Erschienen in: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Requirements elicitation plays a vital role in building effective software. Incorrect or incomplete requirements lead to erroneous software and costs a huge amount of rework. Rework costs in terms of money and efforts are usually higher than the early detection of potential flaws in the requirements. This happens because most of the techniques employed to extract requirements fail to understand end user goals. Understanding your users and their goals is important to build a capable, viable and desirable product or software system. This paper attempts to suggest and evaluate an alternative approach to understand your potential users and their goals so that correct and complete requirements can be formulated resulting in a successful software. We introduce the concept of a tool-guided elicitation process, classify elicitation techniques in term of their suitability in such a tool-guided process, and present an initial study of the usability und usefulness of our prototype called Vision Backlog.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Below the Interface: Evaluation of PLM Software Usability and User Self-efficacy
Nächstes Kapitel Music at Your Fingertips: Designing Mobile Interaction Interfaces for Runners
Fußnoten
Literatur
1.
Denning, P.J., Gunderson, C., Hayes-Roth, R.: The profession of IT evolutionary system development. Commun. ACM 51(12), 29–31 (2008)CrossRef
2.
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, p. 551. Free Press, New York (2003)
3.
Pfeiffer, S., Suphan, A.: The labouring capacity index: living labouring capacity and experience as resources on the road to industry 4.0 (2015)
4.
Benner, P.: From Novice to Expert. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park (1984)
5.
Fernández, D.M., Wagner, S., Kalinowski, M., Felderer, M., Mafra, P., Vetrò, A., Conte, T., Christiansson, M.T., Greer, D., Lassenius, C., Männistö, T.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298–2338 (2017)CrossRef
6.
Yozgyur, K.: A proposal for a requirements elicitation tool to increase stakeholder involvement. In: 2014 5th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), pp. 145–148. IEEE, June 2014
7.
Browne, G.J., Rogich, M.B.: An empirical investigation of user requirements elicitation: comparing the effectiveness of prompting techniques. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17(4), 223–249 (2001)CrossRef
8.
Batool, A., Motla, Y.H., Hamid, B., Asghar, S., Riaz, M., Mukhtar, M., Ahmed, M.: Comparative study of traditional requirement engineering and agile requirement engineering. In: 2013 15th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pp. 1006–1014. IEEE, January 2013
9.
Maiden, N., Jones, S., Karlsen, K., Neill, R., Zachos, K., Milne, A.: Requirements engineering as creative problem solving: a research agenda for idea finding. In: 2010 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 57–66. IEEE, September 2010
10.
Hickey, A.M., Davis, A.M.: A unified model of requirements elicitation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 65–84 (2004)CrossRef
11.
Snowden, D.: Cynefin: a sense of time and space, the social ecology of knowledge management (2000)CrossRef
12.
Maiden, N.: So, what is requirements work? IEEE Softw. 30(2), 14–15 (2013)CrossRef
13.
Boehm, B.W.: A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21(5), 61–72 (1988)CrossRef
14.
Zhang, Z.: Effective requirements development-A comparison of requirements elicitation techniques. In: Berki, E., Nummenmaa, J., Sunley, I., Ross, M., Staples, G. (eds.) Software Quality Management XV: Software Quality in the Knowledge Society, pp. 225–240. British Computer Society (2007)
15.
McManus, J.: A stakeholder perspective within software engineering projects. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management Conference, vol. 2, pp. 880–884. IEEE, October 2004
16.
17.
18.
Cooke, N.J.: Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 41(6), 801–849 (1994)CrossRef
19.
Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D.: About Face 3: the Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)
20.
Atukorala, N.L., Chang, C.K., Oyama, K.: Situation-oriented requirements elicitation. In: 2016 IEEE 40th Annual Conference on Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), vol. 1, pp. 233–238. IEEE, June 2016
21.
Foddy, W.: Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
22.
Wilson, M.: Task models for knowledge elicitation. In: Knowledge Elicitation: Principles, Techniques and Applications, pp. 197–220 (1989)
23.
Carlshamre, P., Karlsson, J.: A usability-oriented approach to requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 145–152. IEEE, April 1996
24.
Prieto Díaz, R.: Domain analysis: an introduction. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 15(2), 47–54 (1990)CrossRef
25.
Goguen, J.A., Linde, C.: Techniques for requirements elicitation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on, Requirements Engineering, pp. 152–164. IEEE, January 1993
26.
Sommerville, I., Sawyer, P.: Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide. Wiley, Hoboken (1997)MATH
27.
Osborn, A.F.: Applied Imagination; Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving. Scribner, New York City (1963)
28.
Wood, J., Silver, D.: Joint Application Development. Wiley, Hoboken (1995)
29.
Pickton, D.W., Wright, S.: What’s swot in strategic analysis? Strateg. Change 7(2), 101–109 (1998)CrossRef
30.
Taplin, D.H., Clark, H.: Theory of Change Basics: A Primer on Theory of Change. Actknowledge, New York (2012)
31.
Kimbell, L., Julier, J.: The Social Design Methods Menu. Fieldstudio Ltd., London (2012)
32.
33.
Kelly, G.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs: Volume Two: Clinical Diagnosis and Psychotherapy. Routledge, Abingdon (2003)
34.
Fransella, F., Bell, R., Bannister, D.: A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)
35.
Vanden Abeele, V., Zaman, B.: Laddering the user experience! In: User Experience Evaluation Methods in Product Development (UXEM 2009)-Workshop, August 2009
36.
Hinkle, D.N.: The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University) (1965)
37.
Gutman, J.: A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 46, 60–72 (1982)CrossRef
38.
Greener, S.: Business Research Methods. BookBoon, London (2008)
39.
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Mensch & Computer 2003, pp. 187–196. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (2003)
40.
Hall, E., Zeldman, J.: Just Enough Research. A Book Apart, New York (2013)
41.
Metadaten
Titel
Assist Users to Straightaway Suggest and Describe Experienced Problems
verfasst von
Björn Senft
Holger Fischer
Simon Oberthür
Nitish Patkar
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Buch
Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91796-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91797-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91797-9_52

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise