Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Change in the Past (1)

verfasst von : Charles Seaford

Erschienen in: Why Capitalists Need Communists

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Normally, when there is no change, elites share norms and expectations of each other, and are unified in a way that their opponents rarely are. This is the source of their power, suggesting that if they become fragmented, and a more unified counter-elite emerges, their grip can be loosened. Historians’ accounts of revolutions or periods of radical change confirm that this is indeed the pattern: the elite fragments and its dissident members join forces with its opponents. The resulting counter-elite forms an alliance with the people, and this alliance is held together by strong belief in ideas and ideals. These contrast the glorious future with the decaying past.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Elites have been defined as groups that exercise the most power in a society (John Scott). As with any sociological definition, this has empirical content: it reminds us that power is exercised by groups and that some groups have more power than others.
 
2
Scott talks of distinct counter-elites that fail to fuse into a single counter-elite. The distinct counter-elites he refers to are “those that organise the response to the exercise of power.” They are not really counter-elites of the kind that took over in France in the 1790s, or Britain in the 1940s and to avoid confusion I will not refer to them as counter-elites.
 
Metadaten
Titel
Change in the Past (1)
verfasst von
Charles Seaford
Copyright-Jahr
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98755-2_4