Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Development of Public Relations Research in the United States and its Status in Communication Science

  • Chapter
Ist Public Relations eine Wissenschaft?

Abstract

Three times in my 25-years of research on communication and public re lations, I have been asked to review the status of public relations research. Each time, I found that little research was being done on public relations, that the research was not being done by public relations scholars, or that the research had generated little theory. In general, then, we Americans must be modest about our research on public relations-at least about the quantity of studies we have done. On the other hand, a relatively small but growing “invisible college” of researchers has developed in the United States in the last 20 years. At the beginning, this group consisted of fewer than five people. Now it probably approaches 50 people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R. B. (1989). Reassessing the odds against finding meaningful behavioral change in mass media health promotion campaigns. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 309–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso ciates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R. (1989). Goals, plans, and discourse comprehension. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.),Message effects in communication science(pp. 75–101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. L. (1974).Public relations: A comprehensive bibliography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1946). The mass, the public, and public opinion. In B. Berelson and M. Janowitz(Eds.),Reader in public opinion and communication(2nd ed., 1966, pp. 43–50). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoma, T. V., & Shapiro, B. P. (1983).Segmenting the industrial market. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradac, J. J.; Hopper, R.; & Wiemann, J. M. (1989). In J. J. Bradac (Ed.),Message effects in communication science(pp. 294–317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, E. W. (1987).The business of public relations. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, E. W. (1988).Public relations programming and production. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, G. M. (1977). Coorientational measurement of public issues.Public Relations Review,3(4), 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, G. M., Cox, Mark S., Krueger, E. A., & Liebler, C. M. (1989). The gap between professional and research agendas in public relations.Public Relations Research Annual,1, 141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broom, G. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1990).Using research in public relations: Applications to program management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom, G. M., & Smith, G. D. (1979). Testing the practitioner’s impact on clients.Public Relations Review,5(3), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R. A., Evans, W. D., & Wagley, R. A. (1989).Management response to public issues(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1989).Business & society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: Southwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, S. H., & McLeod, J. M. (1968). Sensitization in panel design: A coorientational experiment.Journalism Quarterly,54, 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. H. (1984).Issues management: Origins of the Future. Stamford, CT: Issue Action Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, G., & Dionisopoulos, G. N. (1989). Public relations? No, relations with publics: A rhetorical-organizational approach to contemporary corporate communications. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 135–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, C. G. (1985). Public relations: The $1 million dollar penalty for being a woman. In P. J.Creedon (Ed.),Women in mass communication: Challenging gender values(pp. 263–275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972).Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedon, P. J. (1991). Public relations and ‘women’s work’: Toward a feminist analysis of Public Relations roles.Public Relations Research Annual,3, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, H. M. (1989). Breadth of perspective: An important concept for public rela tions.Public Relations Research Annual,1, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutlip, S. M.; Center, A. H.; & Broom, G. H. (1985).Effective public relations(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927).The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilenschneider, R. L. (1990).Power and influence. New York: Prentice-Hall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, D. M. (1990a). The innovation of research in public relations practice: Review of a program of studies.Public Relations Research Annual,2, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, D. M. (1990b, May). .4tale of two corporations. Paper presented to the International Association of Business Communicators, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, D. M. (1991). The organizational roles of communication and public relations practitioners. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to effective organizations(in press) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, D. M., & Grunig, L. A. (1991). The organization of the public relations function. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to effective organizations(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehling, W. P. (1989, January).Public relations management and marketing management: Different paradigms and different missions. Paper presented at the Public Relations Colloquium 1989, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehling, W. P., & White, J. (1991). Public relations and marketing. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to organ-à ational effectiveness(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, F. E. (1984):Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, O. H. Jr. (1982).Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1975). Some consistent types of employee publics.Public Relations Review,1(4), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1976). Organizations and public relations: Testing a communication theory.Journalism MonographsNo. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1977). Evaluating employee communication in a research operation.Public Relations Review,3(4), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1978a). Defining publics in public relations: the case of a suburban hospital.Journalism Quarterly,55, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1978b). A general systems theory of communications, poverty, and underde velopment. In F. L. Casmir (Ed.),International and intercultural communications. Washington: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1979a). The status of public relations research.International Public Relations Association Review,3(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1979b, August).A time for leadership in public relations education. Head’s address to the Public Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1979c). A new measure of public opinions on corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Journal,22, 738–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1982a). The message-attitude-behavior relationship: communication behaviors of organizations.Communication Research,9, 163–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1982b). Developing economic education programs for the press.Public Relations Review,8(3), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1983a). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: two studies.Journalism MonographsNo. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1983b). Washington reporter publics of corporate public affairs programs.Journalism Quarterly,60, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1984). Organizations, environments, and models of public relations.Public Relations Research & Education,1(1), 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1985, May).A structural reconceptualization of the organizational communication audit, with application to a state department of education. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1987). Research in the strategic management of public relations.International public relations review,11(3), 1987, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1989a). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 17–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1989b). Publics, audiences, and market segments: Segmentation principles for campaigns. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.),Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change(pp. 199–228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1989c). Sierra Club study shows who become activists.Public Relations Review,15(3), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. (1990). IABC study shows CEOs value PR.Communication World7(8), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Childers, L. (1988, August).Reconstruction of a situational theory of com munication: internal and external concepts as identifiers of publics for AIDS. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Portland, Ore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1989). Toward a theory of the public relations behavior of organizations: Review of a program of research.Public Relations Research Annual,1, 27–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1991). In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to organizational effectiveness(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E. & Hickson, R. M. (1976). An evaluation of academic research in public relations.Public Relations Review2(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984).Managing public relations. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Ipes, D. A. (1983). The anatomy of a campaign against drunk driving.Public Relations Review,9(2), 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E.; Nelson, C. L.; Richburg, S. J.; & White, T. J. (1988). Communication by agricultural publics: internal and external orientations.Journalism Quarterly,65, 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Repper, F. (1991). Strategic management and the segmentation of publics. In J.E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contr ì butions to organizational effectiveness(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Stamm, K. R. (1973). Communication and the coorientation of collectivities.American Behavioral Scientist,16, 567–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. E., & Theus, K. T. (1986, August).Internal communication systems and employee satisfaction. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Norman, OK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1988). A research agenda for women in public relations.Public Relations Review,14(3), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1989, June).Applications of feminist scholarship to public relations: Displacing the male models. Paper presented to the National Women’s Studies Association, Towson, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1989, August).Toward a feminist transformation of public relations education and practice. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1990a, December).How organization theory can influence public relations theory. Paper presented to the Professional Conference of the Herbert Quandt Foundation Communication Group, Salzburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1990b, May).Preliminary findings on power and gender in the excellence project. Paper presented to the International Association of Business Communicators, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A. (1990c, June).Toward the philosophy of public relations. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1990). Strategies for communicating on innovative management with receptive individuals in development organizations. In M. Mtewa (Ed.),International science and technology: Philosophy, Theory and Policy(pp. 118–131). New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1989).Kenneth Burke on symbols and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984).The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1 (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. L. (1990). Corporate issues management: Theoretical underpinnings and research foundations.Public Relations Research Annual,2, 29–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. L., & Nelson, R. A. (1986).Issues management: Corporate public policymaking in an information society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, K., & Lim, T. S. (1989). Inference-generating knowledge structures in message processing. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.),Message effects in communication science(pp. 102– 129). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodell, J. E. (1976). Matching perceptions of food editors, writers, and readers.Public Relations Review,2(3), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotier, P., & Andreasen, A. R. (1987).Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations(3rd ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge(pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977).Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1986).The marketing imagination(exp. ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratification: A conceptual clarification and exploration.Communication Research,11, 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lionberger, H. F., & Gwin, P. H. (1982).Communication strategies: a guide for agricultural change agents. Danville, IL.: Interstate Printers & Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, S., & DeFleur, M. L. (1983).Milestones in mass communication research. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, B. (1990, June).Bridging the gap between theory and practice in post-1992 Europe:The changing face of public relations. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, H. (1973). Some reasons why information campaigns can succeed.Public Opinion Quarterly,37, 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1987).Mass communication theory(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R. (1989) Persuasion and public relations: Two „Ps“ in a Pod. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 45–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nager, N. R., & Allen, T. H. (1984).Public relations management by objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nager, N. R., & Truitt, R. H. (1987).Strategic public relations counseling. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1977). Heuristics and justification in scientific research: Comments on Shapere. In F.Suppe (Ed.),The structure of scientific theories(2nd ed., pp. 571–589). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, G. J., & Reid, K. (1990). The uses and effects of public service advertising.Public Relations Research Annual,2, 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, M. N. (1987).Corporate public relations and American private enterprise: A new historical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olasky, M. N. (1989). The aborted debate within public relations: An approach through Kuhn’s paradigms.Public Relations Research Annual,1, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmgreen, P. (1984). Uses and gratifications: a theoretical perspective. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.),Communication yearbook8 (pp. 20–55). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, J. V. (1987).The effects of two health information campaigns on the complexity of cognitive structure: An information processing approach. Unpublished doctoral disserta tion, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, J. V., Nwosu, I. E., & Ettel-Gonzalez, D. (1982). Why employees read company newsletters.Public Relations Review,8(3), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. (1989a). Beyond ethical relativism in public relations: Coorientation, rules, and the idea of communication symmetry.Public Relations Research Annual,1, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. (1989b). Business ethics as communication ethics: Public relations practice and the idea of dialogue. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 111–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. (1989c).A theory of public relations ethics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piekos, J. M., & Einsiedel, E. F. (1990). Roles and program evaluation techniques among Canadian public relations practitioners.Public Relations Research Annual,2, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. A. (1990, August).Gender implications in public relations ethics: Kohlberg,Gilligan, and the PRSA code of professional standards. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, V. (1988). On the public aspects of opinion: Linking levels of analysis in public opinion research.Communication Research,15, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakow, L. F. (1989a). Information and power: Toward a critical theory of information campaigns. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.),Information Campaigns: Balancing social values and social change(pp. 164–184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakow, L. F. (1989b). From the feminization of public relations to the promise of feminism. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.),Beyond the velvet ghetto(pp. 287–298). San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Atkin, C. K. (1989).Public communication campaigns(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Paisley, W. (1981).Public communication campaigns. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (1990).Organization theory: The structure and design of organizations. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S. (1971).Innovative behavior and communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983).Diffusion of innovations(3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. T. (1985).The role of involvement in health-information acquisition and processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. T. (Ed.) (1989).Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, D. S. (1989). A social marketing perspective on communication campaigns. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.),Public Communication Campaigns(2nd ed., pp. 87–104). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider [aka Grunig], L. A. (1985).Organizational structure, environmental niches, and public relations: The Hage-Hull typology of organizations as predictor of communication behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. (1977). Scientific theories and their domains. In F. Suppe (Ed.),The structure of scientific theories(2nd ed., pp. 518–564). Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 518–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. (1984).Reason and the search for knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smilowitz, M., & Pearson, R. (1989). Traditional, enlightened, and interpretive perspec tives on corporate annual giving. In C. H. Botan & V. T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 83–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speakes, L., with Pack, R. (1988).Speaking out: Inside the Reagan White House. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriramesh, K., Grunig, J. E., & Buffington, J. (1991). Organizational culture and public relations. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to organizational effectiveness(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriramesh, K., & White, J. (1991). Public relations and national culture. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.),Excellence in public relations and communication management: Contributions to organizational effectiveness(in press). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, E. L. (1988). Making peace with gender issues in public relations.Public Relations Review,14(3), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, E. L., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.) (1991).Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972).Human understanding(Vol. 2). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLeuven, J. K. (1989). Theoretical models for public relations campaigns. In C. H. Botan & V.T. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.),Public relations theory(pp. 193–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, B. J. (1989).The effect of gender, masculinity, and femininity on the practice of and preference for the models of public relations. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. J., with Gunther, M. (1988).Confessions of a PR man. New York: North American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. R. (1986).Mass communication: A sociological perspective(3rd ed.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. James E. Grunig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Horst Avenarius Wolfgang Armbrecht

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grunig, J.E. (1992). The Development of Public Relations Research in the United States and its Status in Communication Science. In: Avenarius, H., Armbrecht, W. (eds) Ist Public Relations eine Wissenschaft?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85772-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85772-9_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12387-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-85772-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation