Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Die Diskussion darüber, wie ein Wohngebiet sozial gemischt sein sollte, ist ebenso alt wie ungelöst. Bereits bei der Errichtung der Cadbury-Siedlung „Bournville“ Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts südwestlich von Birmingham, England, wurde dieses Problem behandelt. Folgt man dem klassischen Artikel von Gans (1961), in dem er das Konzept der Mischung behandelt, so lautet seine Folgerung, sinnvoll sei eine „moderate Heterogenität“. Doch wie sieht (welche?) Mischung dann genau aus?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur:

  • Adelaide City Council 2002: What Sort of Goods are Neighbours? Social Mix and Sustainable Residential Community in Adelaide. „Green Paper“ for the City Living Summit, Feb. 26, Adelaide, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Chris/Camina, Margaret/Casey, Rionach/Coward, Sarah/Wood, Martin 2005: Messages from Three Mature Mixed-tenure Communities, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, Eva/Naumanen, Päivi/Ruonavaara, Hannu/Turner, Bengt 2007: Housing, Socio-Economic Security and Risks. A Qualitative Comparison of Household Attitudes in Finnland and Sweden. In: European Journal of Housing Research 7, S. 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, Roger/Musterd, Sako/Galster, George/Kauppinen, Timo M. 2007: What Mix Matters? Exploring the Relationships Between Individuals' Incomes and Different Measures of Their Neighborhood Context. In: Housing Studies 22, S. 637–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthurson, Kathy/Anaf, Julia 2006: Social Mix and Disadvantaged Communities: Clarifying the Links between Policy, Practice and the Evidence Base. Paper. Presented at the ENHR Conference July 2-6, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Rowland 2005: Neighbourhoods and the Impacts of Social Mix: Crime, Tenure Diversification and Assisted Mobility. University of Tasmania, School of Sociology, Housing and Community Research Unit, CNR Paper 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Rowland/Kintrea, Keith 2000: Owner-occupation, Social Mix and Neighbourhood Impacts. In: Policy and Politics 28, S. 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Nick/Haworth, Anna/Manzi, Tony/Paranagamage, Primali/Roberts, Marion 2006: Creating and Sustaining Mixed Income Communities, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bighini, Barbara 2006: Aufwertung und Stabilisierung von Wohngebieten am Beispiel der Kölner Wohngebiete Vingst und Höhenberg. Unv. Magisterarbeit, Köln: Forschungsinstitut für Soziologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böltken, Ferdinand 1999: Soziale Distanz und räumliche Nähe – Einstellungen und Erfahrungen im alltäglichen Zusammenleben von Deutschen und Ausländern. In: Schmidt, Peter (Hg.): Wir und die anderen, Opladen. S. 141–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, Glen/Karley, Noah Kofi 2007: Homeownership, Poverty and Educational Achievement: School Effects as Neighbourhood Effects. In: Housing Studies 22, S. 693–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, Paul C./Smith, Rhoda N. 1997: Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success. In: Cityscape 3, S. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLG (= Communities and Local Government) 2006: Planning Policy, Statement 3: Housing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Swaan, Abraham 1999: Der sorgende Staat, Frankfurt am Main/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag 2005: Lebenslagen in Deutschland – Zweiter Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht, Bonn: Drucksache 15/5015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Robert D. 2002: The Estimation of Neighborhood Effects in the Social Sciences. In: Social Science Research 31, S. 539–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Robert D./Haurin, Donald R. 2003: The Social and Private Micro-level Consequences of Homeownership. In: Journal of Urban Economics 54, S. 401–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doling, John/Ford, Janet 2007: A Union of Home Owners. In: European Journal of Housing Policy 7, S. 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erbring, Lutz/Young, Alice A. 1979: Contextual Effects as Endogenous Feedback, In: Sociological Methods & Research 7, S. 396–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, Leon/Lupton, Ruth/Hammond, Cathie/Mujtaba, Tamjid/Salter, Emma/Sorhaindo, Annik 2008: The Public Value of Social Housing: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship Between Housing and Life Chances, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jürgen 1998: Do Poor Neighborhoods Make Their Residents Poorer? Context Effects of Poverty Neighborhoods on Residents. In: Andreß, Hans-Jürgen (Hg.): Empirical Poverty Research in Comparative Perspective, Aldershot, S. 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jürgen/Blasius, Jörg 2009: Attitudes of Owners and Renters in a Deprived Neighbourhood. In: European Journal of Housing Policy 9, im Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jürgen/Triemer, Sascha 2008: Gespaltene Städte? Soziale und ethnische Segregation in deutschen Großstädten, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George 1987: Homeowners and Neighborhood Reinvestment, Durham-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George C. 1983: Empirical Evidence on Cross-Tenure Differences in Home Maintenance and Conditions. In: Land Economics 59, S. 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George C. 2003: Investigating Behavioral Impacts of Poor Neighborhoods: Towards New Data and Analytic Strategies. In: Housing Studies 18, S. 893–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George C. 2007: Neighborhood Social Mix as a Goal of Housing Policy: A Theoretical Analysis. In: European Journal of Housing Policy 7, S. 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George C. 2008: Quantifying the Effects of Neighbourhood on Individuals: Challenges, Alternative Approaches, and Promising Directions. In: Schmollers Jahrbuch 128, S. 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J. 1961: The Balanced Community: Homogeneity or Heterogeneity in Residential Areas? In: Journal of the American Institute of Planners 27, S. 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, Barry/Cole, Ian 2001: Social Balance and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Britain since 1979: A Review of Discourse and Practice in Social Housing. In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19, S. 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Rick/Middleton, Alan/Murie, Alan/Broughton, Kevin 2003: Neighbourhoods that work. A Study of Bournville Estate, Birmingham, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, Joseph/Newman, Sandra J. 2003: Differential Effects of Homeownership on Children from Higher- and Lower-Income Families. In: Journal of Housing Research 14, S. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haurin, Donald R./Dietz, Robert D./Weinberg, Bruce A. 2003: The Impact of Neighborhood Homeownership Rates: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. In: Journal of Housing Research 13, S. 119–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, Peter/Swedberg, Richard 1998: Social Mechanisms. An Introductory Essay. In: Hedström, Peter/Swedberg, Richard (Hg.): Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge, S. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlyn, Ulfert/Lakemann, Ulrich/Lettko, Barbara 1991: Armut und Milieu. Benachteiligte Bewohner in großstädtischen Quartieren, Basel/Boston/Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Henner/Melcher, Achim 1973: Ghetto ohne Mauern. Ein Bericht aus der Unterschicht, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Anwen/Elsinga, Marja/Quilgars, Deborah/Toussaint, Jannecke 2007: Home Owner's Perceptions of and Responses to Risk. In: European Journal of Housing Policy 7, S. 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, Ben 1999: Living Together. Community Life in Mixed Tenure Estates, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Ade/Mason, Phil 2007: Mixed Tenure Communities and Neighbourhood Quality. In: Housing Studies 22, S. 661–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes, Robert/Knäble, Stephan 1988: Der Bevölkerungsaustausch in ethnisch gemischten Wohngebieten. Ein Test der Tipping-Theorie von Schelling. In: Friedrichs, Jürgen (Hg.): Soziologische Stadtforschung, Opladen, S. 293–309. (Sonderheft 29 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans, Reinout 2004: Social Implications of Housing Diversification in Urban Renewal: A Review of Recent Literature. In: Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19, S. 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, Tama/Brooks-Gunn, Jeannette 2000: The Neighborhoods They Live in: The Effects of Neighborhood Residence on Child and Adolescent Outcomes. In: Psychological Bulletin 126, S. 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Mark/Bailey, Nick/Kearns, Ade 2008: The Influence of Neighbourhood Deprivation on People's Attachment to Places, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, Ruth 2003: „Neighbourhood Effects“: Can we Measure Them and Does it Matter? CASE paper 73, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzi, Tony/Smith Bowers, Bill 2003: Developing Unstable Communities? The Experience of Mixed Tenure and Multi-landlord Estates. Paper, presented at the Housing Studies Association Conference, Sept 9-10, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musterd, Sako/Andersson, Roger 2005: Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities. In: Urban Affairs Review 40, S. 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberwittler, Dietrich 2004: Stadtstruktur, Freundeskreise und Delinquenz. Eine Mehrebenenanalyse zu sozialökologischen Kontexteffekten auf schwere Jugenddelinquenz. In: Oberwittler, Dietrich/Karstedt, Susanne (Hg.): Soziologie der Kriminalität, Wiesbaden, S. 135–170 (Sonderheft 43 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, Wim/Musterd, Sako/de Vos, Sjoerd 2001: Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence. In: Housing Studies 16, S. 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, David 2000: Communities in the Balance. The Reality of Social Exclusion on Housing Estates, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, Thomas F./Tropp, Linda R. 2006: A Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, S. 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, James E./Stroh, Linda K./Flynn, Cathy A. 1998: Lake Parc Place: A Study of Mixed-Income Housing. In: Housing Policy Debate 9, S. 703–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter H./Weber, Eleanor 1996: The Social Benefits of Homeownership: Empirical Evidence from National Surveys. In: Housing Policy Debate 7, S. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, Robert J./Morenoff, Jeffrey D./Gannon-Rowley, Thomas 2002: Assessing „Neighborhood Effects“: Social Processes and New Directions in Research. In: Annual Review of Sociology 28, S. 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkissian, Wendy 1976: The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review. In: Urban Studies 13, S. 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas 1978: Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönwälder, Karen/Söhn, Janina/Schmid, Nadine 2007: Siedlungsstrukturen von Migranten in Deutschland: Schwerpunkte der Ansiedlung und innerstädtische Konzentration. Discussion Paper SP IV 2007-601, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Alex/Tajbakhsh, Kian 1997: Mixed-Income Housing: Unanswered Questions. In: Cityscape 3, S. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Homes 2006: Tenure Mix and Neighbourhood Regeneration. In: PRECiS No. 127 (www.scot-homes.gov.uk/pdfs/pub).

  • SEU (= Social Exclusion Unit) 2000: National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: A Framework for Consultation, London: Cabinet Office. (www.socialexclusionunit.gov.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=48)

  • Silverman, Emily/Lupton, Ruth/Fenton, Alex 2006: Attracting and Retaining Families in New Urban Mixed Income Communities, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toussaint, Janneke/Tegeder, Gudrun/Elsinga, Marja/Helbrecht, Ilse 2007: Security and Insecurity of Homeownership: Germany and the Netherlands. In: European Journal of Housing Policy 7, S. 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, Rebecca 2003: „Mixed Tenure“ Policy in the UK: Privatisation, Pluralism or Euphemism? In: Housing, Theory and Society 20, S. 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, Rebecca/Fenton, Alex 2006: In the Mix. A Review of Mixed Income, Mixed Tenure and Mixed Communities, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William J. 1987: The Truly Disadvantaged, Chicago-London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Annette Harth Gitta Scheller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedrichs, J. (2010). Welche soziale Mischung in Wohngebieten?. In: Harth, A., Scheller, G. (eds) Soziologie in der Stadt- und Freiraumplanung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92010-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92010-8_19

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16580-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92010-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics