Skip to main content

2004 | Buch

Leading Pharmaceutical Innovation

Trends and Drivers for Growth in the Pharmaceutical Industry

verfasst von: Professor Dr. Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Professor Dr. Maximilian von Zedtwitz

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

Pharmaceutical innovation is like gambling at roulette, only the stakes are higher. Considerably higher, since the most recent estimates put the costs of drug development at US$ 800 million to US$ 1 billion - per drug! This is equivalent to the price tag of the Empire State Building, when it was for sale a few years ago. In 2001, the major US and European pharmaceutical companies invested more than US$ 30 billion in R&D, at a higher R&D­ to-sales ratio than virtually any other industry, including chemicals, auto­ mobiles, electronics, aerospace, and computers. Delivering a blockbuster drug is the Holy Grail for any pharmaceutical company. But in the last decade the rules of developing blockbusters seem to have changed. On the one hand, more sophisticated screening technolo­ gies, genetic engineering, and expanding networks with biotechnology companies increase the probability of commercial success. Critical success factors include the discovery phase and a stronger outside-in orientation in the early innovation phase. After the implosion of the high-tech stock mar­ ket, biotechnology and other technology-driven opportunities may have lost some of their attractiveness for big pharma: a pipeline of solid and predictable innovations seems to be the highest goal of most pharmaceuti­ cal companies again. On the other hand, despite significant investments in pipeline management and novel technologies, there is still no recipe for ensuring a blockbuster hit.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
I. Innovation as a Key Success Factor in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Abstract
Despite its high R&D intensity, the pharmaceutical industry is facing an increasingly dire situation. On average, only 1 out of 10′000 substances becomes a marketable product. And only 3 out of 10 drugs generate revenues that meet or exceed average R&D costs (see Reuters 2002).
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
II. Pharmaceutical Innovation: The Case of Switzerland
Abstract
Although we are going to focus on the Swiss pharmaceutical industry mostly, we will be referring to examples from both the pharmaceutical and the chemical disciplines for illustration, and will introduce the pharmaceutical industry in this wider context. The pharmaceutical industry originally emerged from the chemical industry. Still today, chemistry represents a significant part in the innovation of pharmaceutical products. There are a number of similarities in the production processes of both chemical and pharmaceutical substances. Many industry reports aggregate the chemical and the pharmaceutical industries into one single industry called ‘the pharmaceutical-chemical industry’.
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
III. The Science and Technology Challenge: How to Find New Drugs
Abstract
Due to the enormous costs of building up a pharmaceutical R&D infrastructure, it was generally believed in the late 1970s and early 1980s that no new company would ever be able to enter the pharmaceutical industry and to compete with the industry’s giants (see Robbins-Roth 2001). However, some entrepreneurs were not impressed with this challenge and created an entirely new industry — the biotechnology industry. Besides an innovative management approach as well as creative funding strategies, the main drivers for the rise of the biotechnology industry have been the emergence of new sciences and technologies. While innovation activities of established pharmaceutical companies were traditionally based on organic chemistry, biochemistry and chemical engineering, biotechnology companies have built a reputation in many novel areas, such as cell biology, molecular genetics, protein chemistry and encymology (Whittaker, Bower 1994).
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
IV. The Pipeline Management Challenge: How to Shape the Innovation-Flow
Abstract
At any given time there are more than 1’000 drugs in development (PhRMA 2001). In 2000, the breakdown was as follows: more than 100 for AIDS, 350 for cancer, 120 for heart diseases and strokes, 26 for Alzheimer’s disease, 25 for diabetes, and more than 200 for special needs of children. In order to maintain or exceed double-digit growth expectations, pharmaceutical companies are required to deliver between two and four new drugs every year. Given the high attrition rate in drug development, they have to fill the R&D pipeline with as many new drug candidates as possible.
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
V. The Outsourcing and Internationalization Challenge: How to Harness Outside Innovation
Abstract
A market survey by Arthur D. Little and Solvias (2002) has shown that only lead finding, lead optimization and marketing are seen as core activities of pharmaceutical companies that have to be provided 100% in-house. All other activities are potential candidates for outsourcing, except for project management, which is a backbone process ensuring efficient know-how transfer between the different steps in pharmaceutical innovation. In fact, this outsourcing potential could have a major impact on the pharmaceutical value chain (Fig. 37).
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
VI. Management Answers to Pharmaceutical R&D Challenges
Abstract
Time-to-market is extremely important in breakthrough pharmaceuticals: the first in the market captures 40–60% of the market, and the second only around 15%. Coming in behind third means a negative business.
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
VII. Future Directions and Trends
Abstract
Closing the productivity gap in research and development is the foremost task in the pharmaceutical industry and represents the single-most important direction for future activities in pharmaceutical innovation. The pharmaceutical industry is facing a great number of challenges.
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
VIII. Appendices
Abstract
Novartis was formed in 1996 through the merger of Ciba Geigy and Sandoz. Cost savings from the merger have resulted in net profit margins at the high end of the industry average; this has enabled Novartis to invest significantly in organic growth. In addition, Novartis consolidated activities with the divestment of non-core businesses. As a first and significant step, the company spun-off its CHF 8 billion specialty chemicals business Ciba SC in 1997. Afterwards, Novartis divested its CHF 5.5 billion agribusiness sector, merging it with the agrochemicals business of AstraZeneca to form Syngenta. Novartis now operates its core businesses in two divisions: pharmaceuticals and consumer health.
Oliver Gassmann, Gerrit Reepmeyer, Maximilian von Zedtwitz
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
Leading Pharmaceutical Innovation
verfasst von
Professor Dr. Oliver Gassmann
Gerrit Reepmeyer
Professor Dr. Maximilian von Zedtwitz
Copyright-Jahr
2004
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Electronic ISBN
978-3-540-24781-4
Print ISBN
978-3-662-12219-8
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24781-4