Abstract
Research with human tissue has often no direct benefit for the participating patients or test persons. Researchers, who want to use human tissue for their projects have to seek mechanisms to motivate tissue donors which are practicable in the framework of a specific study design. As some former cases show, there is a potential conflict of interests between researchers and patients which sometimes even culminates in legal proceedings with counterintuitive outcomes. The article presents two prominent cases and analyzes notions of justice for the field of tissue extraction and research and the distribution of possible benefits to researchers and patients. The Aristotelian conception of justice and distribution serves as a starting point for this analysis. Criticism concerning the commercialisation of the human body is taken into account and a variety of commercial as well as non-commercial forms of benefit-sharing are proposed and discussed with regard to the specific character of the research study. Thinking the categories of study type and potential benefits together results in a chart with customized benefits for each research study. The article comes to the conclusion that forms of benefit-sharing are an adequate instrument to avoid conflicts of interests in projects which are based on research with human tissue. It seems to be important to choose the right form of benefit-sharing for a specific project, dependent on the project’s characteristics and potential benefits for the patients.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Aristotle (2004) Nikomachische Ethik. Cited after the edition of the Digitale Bibliothek in the translation of Adolf Lasson, Berlin
Brownsword R (2007) Biobank Governance: Property, Privacy and Consent. In: Lenk C, Hoppe N, Andorno R (eds) Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property. Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology, pp 11-25. Ashgate, Aldershot
Canavan Foundation (2000) Canavan Foundation Joins Lawsuit against Miami Children’s Hospital. http://canavanfoundation.org/news/10-00_miamihostpital.php. Accessed 06 September 2007
Engels EM (2002) Biobanken für die medizinische Forschung – zur Einführung. In: Nationaler Ethikrat (ed) Biobanken. Chancen für den medizinischen Fortschritt oder Ausverkauf der ‚Ressource’ Mensch? pp 11-22. Nationaler Ethikrat, Berlin
Gordon JS (2007) Aristoteles über Gerechtigkeit. Das V. Buch der Nikomachischen Ethik. Alber, Freiburg, München
Hoppe N (2007) Out of Touch: From Corporeal to Incorporeal or Moore Revisited. In: Lenk C, Hoppe N, Andorno R (eds) Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property. Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology pp 199-210. Ashgate, Aldershot
HUGO Ethics Committee (2000) Statement on Benefit-Sharing. www.hugo-international.org/Statement_on_Benefit_Sharing.htm. Accessed 19 September 2007
Lenk C, Hoppe N (2007) Ein Modell zur Konstitution von Nutzungsrechten an menschlichem Gewebe und Köpermaterialien. In: Taupitz J (ed) Kommerzialisierung des menschlichen Körpers pp 199-211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Lenk C 2008: Gibt es das Recht auf Eigentum am eigenen Körper? Ein Beitrag zur Forschungsethik in der kantischen Tradition der Aufklärung. Z Med Ethik 54: 13-22
Marshall E (2000) Families Sue Hospital. Scientist for Control of Canavan Gene. Science 290: 1062
Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge
Scott S (2003) ‚Loneliest island’ may hold key to asthma. National Post, 18 January 2003
Slutsky AS, Zamel N (1997) Genetics of Asthma. The University of Toronto Program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 130-132
U.K. Biobank (2003) Ethics and Governance Framework. Background Document. www.wellcome. ac.uk/assets/WTD003287.doc. Accessed on 18 September 2007
Widdows H (2007) Reconceptualizing Genetics: Challenges to Traditional Medical Ethics. In: Lenk C, Hoppe N, Andorno R (eds) Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property. Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology pp 159-173. Ashgate, Aldershot
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lenk, C. (2012). Donors and Users of Human Tissue for Research Purposes. In: Dabrock, P., Taupitz, J., Ried, J. (eds) Trust in Biobanking. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim, vol 33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78845-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78845-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78844-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78845-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)