Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
What Is an Ontology? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2009 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Ontologies for Cultural Heritage

verfasst von : Martin Doerr

Erschienen in: Handbook on Ontologies

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Summary

In the cultural heritage domain information systems are increasingly deployed, digital representations of physical objects are produced in immense numbers and there is a strong political pressure on memory institutions to make their holdings accessible to the public in digital form. The sector splits into a set of disciplines with highly specialized fields. Due to the resulting diversity, one can hardly speak about a “domain” in the sense of “domain ontologies” [33]. On the other side, study and research of the past is highly interdisciplinary. Characteristically, archaeology employs a series of “auxiliary” disciplines, such as archaeometry, archaeomedicine, archaeobotany, archaeometallurgy, archaeoastronomy, etc., but also historical sources and social theories.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Ontologies for Formal Representation of Biological Systems
Nächstes Kapitel RDF Storage and Retrieval Systems
Fußnoten
1
http://www.icom.org
 
2
http://www.ifla.org
 
3
http://www.ica.org
 
4
For instance, those published by the conference series Computer Applications & Quantitative Methods in Archaeology http://caa.leidenuniv.nl/ proceedings/
 
5
Round Table discussion at the 8th EAA ANNUAL MEETING, 24–29 September 2002, Thessaloniki–Hellas, http://www.symvoli.com.gr/eaa8/mple.htm#P5
 
6
http://dublincore.org/
 
7
http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr
 
8
http://www.iconclass.nl/
 
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
T. Baker, M. Dekkers, R. Heery, M. Patel, and G. Salokhe. What Terms Does Your Metadata Use? Application Profiles as Machine-Understandable Narratives. Journal of Digital Information 2(2), 2(No. 65), 2001.
10.
R. Bennett, Chr. Hengel-Dittrich, E. O’neill, and B. Tillett. VIAF (Virtual International Authority File): Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files. In WLIC2006, Seoul Korea, 2006.
11.
P. Bonora, Ch. Ossicini, and G. Raffa. From Relational Metadata Standards to CRM Ontology: a Case Study in Performing Arts. In Proc. of CIDOC2006, Gothenburg, 2006.
12.
J.M. Bower and M. et al Baca. Union List of Artist Names - A User’s Guide to the Authority Reference Tool, Version 1.0, Getty Art Information Program. G.K. Hall, New York, 1994.
13.
A. Cali. Reasoning in Data Integration Systems: Why LAV and GAV Are Siblings. In Proc. of ISMIS 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2871, pages 562–571. Springer, 2003.
14.
D. Calvanese, G. Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and R. Rosati. Description Logic Framework for Information Integration. In Proc. of the 6th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pages 2–13., Trento, Italy, 1998.
15.
16.
17.
A. D’Andrea and G. Ferrandino. Shared Iconographical Representations with Ontological Models. In Proc. of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference, CAA2007, Berlin, Germany, 2-6 April 2007. CAA.
18.
M. Doerr. Mapping of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set to the CIDOC CRM. Technical Report TR-274, FORTH-ICS, July 2000.
19.
M. Doerr. The CIDOC CRM - An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine, 24(3), 2003.
20.
M. Doerr. Modelling Learning Subjects as Relationships. Intuitive Human Interface, LNAI 3359:200–214, 2004.
21.
M. Doerr, J. Hunter, and C. Lagoze. Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration. Journal of Digital information, 4(1)(169), 2003.
22.
M. Doerr and D. Kalomoirakis. A Metastructure for Archeological Terminology. In Proc. of the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference (CAA 2000), Ljubljana, Slovenia, April 18-21 2000.
23.
M. Doerr, G. Markakis, M. Theodoridou, and M. Tsikritzis. DIATHESIS: OCR based semantic annotation of newspapers. In Proc. of the third SEEDI International Conference: Digitization of cultural and scientific heritage, Cetinje, Montenegro, September 13-15 2007.
24.
M. Doerr and A. Sarris, editors. CAA2002, The Digital Heritage of Archaeology, Proceedings of the 30th Conference, Heraklion, Crete, April 2003. Hellenic Ministry of Culture.
25.
M. Doerr, K. Schaller, and M. Theodoridou. Integration of Complementary Archaeological Sources. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference, Prato, Italy, April 2004.
26.
Ch. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.
27.
J.-Cl. Gardin. The structure of archaeological theories. Studies in Modern Archaeology Vol. 3: Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, 3:7–25, 1990.
28.
P. Gorgels, L. Aroyo, Y. Wang, R. Brussee, l. Rutledge, and N. Stash. Personalized Museum Experience: The Rijksmuseum Use Case. In Proc. Museums and the Web 2007 Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2007. Archives & Museums Informatics.
29.
A. Grant, editor. SPECTRUM - The Museum Documentation Standard. The Museum Documentation Association, 1994.
30.
A. Grant, J. Nieuwenhuis, and T. Petersen, editors. International guidelines for museum object information: the CIDOC information categories. 1995.
31.
M. Greengrass. E-science Challenges in the World of Historical Studies, 2006.
32.
T.-R. Gruber. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43((5-6)):907–928, 1995. Special issue on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation.
33.
N. Guarino. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In FOIS’98, pages 3–15, 1998.
34.
M. Guercio, J. Barthelemy, and A. Bonardi. Authenticity Issue in Performing Arts using Live Electronics. In Proceedings of the 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC07), pages 226–229, Lefkada, Greece, 2007.
35.
G. Guizzardi, H. Herre, and G. Wagner. On the General Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling. In Proc. Conceptual Modeling - ER 2002: 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, volume 15, pages 65–78, Tampere, Finland, 2002. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
36.
P. Harpring. Proper Words in Proper Places: The Thesaurus of Geographic Names. MDA Information, 2(3), 5-12., 2(3):5 12, 1997.
37.
R. Heery and M. Patel. Application Profiles: Mixing and Matching Metadata Schemas. Ariadne, (Issue 25), 2000.
38.
S. Hermon and F. Niccolucci. A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Typology Archaeological Research. In CAA 2002. The Digital Heritage in Archaeology. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, pages 307–310, Heraklion, Crete, April, 2002 2002. Proceedings of the 30th Conference, CAA.
39.
I. Hodder. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
40.
J. Hunter. Combining the CIDOC/CRM and MPEG-7 to Describe Multimedia in Museums. Museums and the Web, 2002.
41.
J. Hunter. The Role of Information Technologies in Indigenous Knowledge Management, chapter Chapter 9. Indigenous knowledge and libraries. Australian Academic & Researchers Libraries., 2005.
42.
E. Hyvonen, E. Makela, M. Salminen, A. Valo, K. Viljanen, S. Saarela, M. Junnila, and S. Kettula. Museumfinland Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics, 3((2)):224–241, 2005.CrossRef
43.
C. Kakali, I. Lourdi, Th. Stasinopoulou, L. Bountouri, C. Papatheodorou, M. Doerr, and M. Gergatsoulis. Integrating Dublin Core Metadata for Cultural Heritage Collections Using Ontologies. In Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, Hanoi, Vietnam, 10-13 December 2007. To appear.
44.
M. Keynes. Ontology-driven Event Recognition on Stories. Technical report, KMI-TR-135, Knowledge Media Institute, 2003.
45.
C. Lagoze. Business Unusual: How “event awareness” may breathe life into the catalog. In Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control in the New Millennium: Confronting the Challenges of Networked Resources and the Web, Washington, DC., 2000.
46.
C. Lagoze and J. Hunter. The ABC Ontology and Model. Journal of Digital Information 2(2), (Article No. 77), 2001.
47.
P. LeBoeuf. Frbr and Further. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32((4)): 15–22, 2001.
48.
P. LeBoeuf. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (Frbr): Hype or Cure-All. Haworth Press, Inc, 2005.
49.
P. LeBoeuf, Ch. Lahanier, G. Aitken, P. Sinclair, P. Lewis, and K. Martinez. Integrating Museum & Bibliographic Information: The SCULPTEUR Project. In Proc. ICHIM 2005 Conference, Paris, 2005.
50.
J. Lehmann, S. Borgo, C. Masolo, and A. Gangemi. Causality and Causation in DOLCE. In Vieu L. (eds) Varzi, A.C., editor, Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the International Conference FOIS 2004, pages 273–284, Torino, November 4-6 2004. IOS Press Amsterdam.
51.
A. Magkanaraki, S. Alexaki, V. Christophides, and D. Plexousakis. Benchmarking RDF schemas for the Semantic Web. In Proc. First International Semantic Web Conference on the Semantic Web, number 12, pages 132–146, Sardinia, Italy, 2002. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
52.
J. Makkonen and H. Ahonen-Myka. Utilizing Temporal Information in Topic Detection and Tracking. In Proc. of the 7th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2003), pages 393–404, Trondheim, Norway, 2003. Springer.
53.
A. Maple. Faceted Access: A Review of the Literature, 1995.
54.
C. Masolo, S. Borgo, A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, and A. Oltramari. Ontology Library (final). IST Project 2001-33052 WonderWeb: Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. Deliverable D18., 2003.
55.
J. McCarthy. Programs with Common Sense, pages 403–418. Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press, Minsky, M. (ed). edition, 1969.
56.
C. Meghini, M. Doerr, and N. Spyratos. Sharing Co-reference Knowledge for Data Integration. DELOS Network of Excellence, 2007. In Second DELOS Conference - Working Notes. Pisa, Italy.
57.
A. Mikheev, M. Moens, and C. Grover. Named Entity Recognition without Gazetteers. In EACL, pages 1–8, 1999.
58.
59.
J. Mylopoulos, A. Borgida, M. Jarke, and M. Koubarakis. Telos: Representing Knowledge about Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 8((4)):325–362, 1990.CrossRef
60.
61.
62.
M. Patel, T. Koch, M. Doerr, and Chr. Tsinaraki. D5.3.1: Semantic Interoperability in Digital Library Systems. Deliverable, Project no.507618, DELOS, A Network of Excellence on Digital Libraries, June 2005.
63.
JL. Peterson. Petri net theory and the modeling of systems. Prentice-Hall, 1981.
64.
Oxford University Press, editor. Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Getty Trust Publications, 1994.
65.
SR. Ranganathan. A descriptive account of Colon Classification. Bangalore: Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science., 1965.
66.
PA. Reed. CIDOC Relational Data Model. A Guide. ICOM/CIDOC, 1995.
67.
V. Roux and P. Blasco. Logicisme et format scd: dune epistemologie pratique a de nouvelles pratiques editoriales hermes. 2004. CNRS - editions.
68.
69.
E. Schulten, H. Akkermans, G. Botquin, M. Doerr, N. Guarino, N. Lopes, and N. Sadeh. Call for Participants: The E-CommerceProduct Classification Challenge. IEEE Intelligent System, 16((4)):86–c3., 2001.
70.
The SHIC Working Party. Social, Historical and Industrial Classification (2nd edition). The Museum Documentation Association, Cambridge, UK, 1993.
71.
B. Smith. Ontology. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, pages 155–166, 2003. Floridi, L. (ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
72.
B. Smith. Against Idiosyncrasy in Ontology Development. In B. Bennett and Fellbaum C., editors, Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2006), pages 15–26, Amsterdam, 2006. IOS Press.
73.
DA. Smith and G. Crane. Disambiguating Geographic Names in a Historical Digital Library. In Proc. of the 5th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001), pages 127–136, Darmstadt, Germany, 2001. Springer.
74.
D. Tudhope and C. Binding. A Case Study of a Faceted Approach to Knowledge Organisation and Retrieval. DigiCULT, Resource Discovery Technologies for the Heritage Sector, (Thematic Issue 6):2833, 2004.
75.
D. Tudhope, C. Binding, D. Blocks, and D. Cunliffe. Query Expansion via Conceptual Distance in Thesaurus Indexed Collections. Journal of Documentation, 62((4)):509–533, 2006. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRef
76.
M. vanGendt, A. Isaac, L. vanderMeij, and S. Schloback. Semantic Web Techniques for Multiple Views on Heterogeneous Collections: A Case Study. In Proc. of the 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2006), pages 426–437, Alicante, Spain, 2006. Springer.
77.
M. Vargas-Vera and D. Celjuska. Event Recognition on News Stories and Semi-Automatic Population of an Ontology. Web Intelligence, pages 615–618, 2004.
78.
SM. Vinas. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Elsevier Oxford, 2005.
Metadaten
Titel
Ontologies for Cultural Heritage
verfasst von
Martin Doerr
Copyright-Jahr
2009
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Handbook on Ontologies

Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70999-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-540-92673-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2009

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_21