Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Mindless Modeling to Scientific Models

The Case of Emerging Models

  • Conference paper
Philosophy and Cognitive Science

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 2))

Abstract

This paper aims at contributing to the ongoing epistemological debate on the nature of models by proposing an excursus from emerging to scientific modeling that will highlight the similarities between the two forms: this analysis will also allow to focus on the development of those traits that are instead typical of scientific models. The analysis of basic forms of modeling will to show how even mindless processing of external reality does not provide passive descriptions but is rather a poietic aggression which constitutes external reality as the organism perceives it. In my argument I will make apparent how this poietic character is indeed common to both emerging and scientific modeling. My final contention will be that scientific endeavor, captured within Magnani’s notion of epistemic warfare, is not characterized by a dramatic qualitative difference in the nature of models at play, but by a new conception and attitude displayed by scientists in their used of models, also coupled with the other fundamental scientific tool: the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertazzi, L., van Tonder, G.J., Vishwanath, D. (eds.): Perception Beyond Inference: The Information Content of Visual Processes. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolotti, T., Magnani, L.: The Role of Agency Detection in the Invention of Supernatural Beings An Abductive Approach. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. SCI, vol. 314, pp. 239–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C.D., Emery, N.J.: Rooks use stones to raise the water level to reach a floating worm. Current Biology 19, 1410–1414 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, P., Keijzer, F.: Cognition in plants. In: Baluška, F. (ed.) Plant-Environment Interactions: From Sensory Plant Biology to Active Plant Behavior, pp. 247–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: If no capacities then no credible worlds. But can models reveal capacities? Erkenntnis 70, 45–58 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: Models: Parables v fables. In: Frigg, R., Hunter, M. (eds.) Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 262, pp. 19–31. Springer, Netherlands (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravartty, A.: Informational versus functional theories of scientific representation. Synthese 172, 197–213 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, S.: Building to discover: a common coding model. Cognitive Science 33, 1059–1086 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.L.: Negation as failure. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) Logic and Data Bases, pp. 94–114. Plenum, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Contessa, G.: Scientific representation, interpretation, and surrogative reasoning. Philosophy of Science 74, 48–68 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contessa, G.: Scientific models and fictional objects. Synthese 172, 215–229 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., Holmes, A.: What is enumerated by subitization mechanisms? Perception & Psychophysics 67(7), 1229–1241 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cruz, H.: Towards a darwinian approach to mathematics. Foundations of Science 11, 157–196 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., Tsivkin, S.: Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science 284(5416), 970–974 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S.: The Number Sense. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J.: Can religious arguments persuade? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63, 71–86 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: Against Method (1975), 3rd edn. Verso, London-New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R.: Fiction and scientific representation. In: Frigg, R., Hunter, M.C. (eds.) Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science, pp. 97–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R.: Fiction in science. In: Woods, J. (ed.) Fictions and Models: New Essays, pp. 247–287. Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigg, R.: Models and fiction. Synthese 172, 251–268 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G.: The Assayer (1623). In: Drake, S. (ed.& trans.) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, pp. 231–280. Doubleday, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendler, T.S.: Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49(9), 397–424 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: Explaining Science: a Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese 172, 269–281 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: Why scientific models should not be regarded as works of fiction. In: Suárez, M. (ed.) Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, pp. 248–258. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, P.: The mathematics of motion camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271(1538), 477–481 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P.: Models and fictions in science. Philosophical Studies 143, 101–116 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E.: Transforming Nature. Ethics, Invention and Discovery. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C.M.: Imitation, culture and cognition. Animal Behavior 46, 999–1010 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D.: Evolution of the visual cortex and the emergence of symmetry in the acheulean techno-complex. Evolution 8, 93–97 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H.: Hidden Order. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H.: Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P., Jeannerod, M.: Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh, D.: Complementary strategies: Why we use our hands when we think. In: Moore, J.D., Lehman, J.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Seventheenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 212–217. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuorikoski, J., Lehtinen, A.: Incredible worlds, credible results. Erkenntnis 70, 119–131 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É.: Mental representations as simulated affordances: not intrinsic, not so much functional, but intentionally-driven. Intellectica 1-2(36-37), 385–387 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, P.: Lockhart’s lament (March 2008), http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_03_08.html

  • Magnani, L.: Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Conjectures and manipulations. Computational modeling and the extra-theoretical dimension of scientific discovery. Minds and Machines 14, 507–537 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Model-based and manipulative abduction in science. Foundations of Science 9, 219–247 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Mimetic minds. Meaning formation through epistemic mediators and external representations. In: Loula, A., Gudwin, R., Queiroz, J. (eds.) Artificial Cognition Systems, pp. 327–357. Idea Group Publishers, Hershey (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Animal abduction. From mindless organisms to artifactual mediators. In: Magnani, L., Li, P. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science, Technology, and Medicine, pp. 3–37. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Morality in a Technological World. Knowledge as Duty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Scientific Models are Not Fictions: Model-Based Science as Epistemic Warfare. In: Magnani, L., Li, L. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. SAPERE, vol. 2, pp. 1–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, U.: MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis 70, 29–43 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: On reading signs: Some differences between us and the others. In: Kimbrough Oller, D., Griebel, U. (eds.) Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach, pp. 15–29. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizrahi, M.: Idealizations and scientific understanding. Philosophical Studies (2009), http://www.springerlink.com/content/e33h421502t20118/ , doi: 10.1007/s11098-011-9716-3

  • Morrison, M.: Fictions, representations, and reality. In: Suárez, M. (ed.) Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, pp. 110–135. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J.: Creating Scientific Concepts. MIT Press, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesic, P.: Wrestling with proteus: Francis bacon and the “torture” of nature. Isis 90(1), 81–94 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portides, D.P.: The relation between idealization and approximation in scientific model construction. Science & Education 16, 699–724 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulos, A.: Is perception informationally encapsulated? The issue of theory-ladenness of perception. Cognitive Science 25, 423–451 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulos, A.: Reentrant pathways and the theory-ladenness of perception. Philosophy of Science 68, S187–S189 (2001); Proceedings of PSA 2000 Biennal Meeting

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivas, J., Burghardt, G.M.: Crotalomorphysm: a metaphor for understanding anthropomorphism by omission. In: Bekoff, M., Allen, C., Burghardt, M. (eds.) The Cognitive Animal. Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, pp. 9–18. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, J.: Truth-reliability and the evolution of human cognitive faculties. Philosophical Studies 117, 95–106 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelhorn, J., Rowland, H.M., Ruxton, G.D.: The evolution and ecology of masquerade. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 99(1), 1–8 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, M.V., Davey, M.: Strategies for active camouflage of motion. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 259(1354), 19–25 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., Merilaita, S.: Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 423–427 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, M.: Scientific fictions as rules of inference. In: Suárez, M. (ed.) Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, pp. 158–178. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez, M.: Fictions, inference, and realism. In: Woods, J. (ed.) Fictions and Models: New Essays, pp. 225–245. Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: Credible worlds, capacities and mechanisms. Erkenntnis 70, 3–27 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson-Jones, M.: Missing systems and the face value practice. Synthese 172, 283–299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toon, A.: The ontology of theoretical modelling: models as make believe. Synthese 172, 301–315 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D.: Discovering discovery: How faraday found the first metallic colloid. Perspectives on Science 14(1), 97–121 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, A.A.S., Kacelnik, A.: A new caledonian crow (corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Animal Cognition 9, 317–334 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M.: Three kinds of idealization. Journal of Philosophy 104(12), 639–659 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J., Rosales, A.: Unifying the fictional. In: Woods, J. (ed.) Fictions and Models: New Essays, pp. 345–388. Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J., Rosales, A.: Virtuous Distortion: Abstraction and Idealization in Model-Based Science. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. SCI, vol. 314, pp. 3–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: The Death of Argument. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J. (ed.): Fictions and Models: New Essays. Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Arts and Humanities, Philosophy Section and Computational Philosophy Laboratory, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Tommaso Bertolotti

Authors
  1. Tommaso Bertolotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Bertolotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Philosophy, Universita Pavia, Piazza Botta 6, Pavia, 27100, Italy

    Lorenzo Magnani

  2. , Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-sen University, XinGang Xi Lu 135, Guangzhou, 510275, China, People's Republic

    Ping Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bertolotti, T. (2012). From Mindless Modeling to Scientific Models. In: Magnani, L., Li, P. (eds) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation