nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Characterize Ground Motions

verfasst von : Junbo Jia

Erschienen in: Modern Earthquake Engineering

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

To determine the location of an earthquake occurrence, two geometric notations, namely hypocenter and epicenter, will be introduced first. Because the majority of earthquakes are caused by the rupture of the rock along a fault or multiple faults, and thousands of square kilometers of fault plane surface may be involved in this rupture, while it is important to define a location in a fault where the rupture initiates, this location is normally referred to as hypocenter or focus as shown in Fig. 3.1. From the hypocenter, the rupture spreads across the fault at velocities ranging from 2 to 3 km/s [1].

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Offshore Structures Versus Land-Based Structures

Nächstes Kapitel Determination of Site Specific Earthquake Ground Motions

Bolt BA (1989) The nature of earthquake ground motion. In: Naeim F (ed) The seismic design handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

Murty CVR (2001) Earthquake tip. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

FEMA 99, Non-technical explanation of the NEHRP recommended provisions, 1999

Tsai N-C (1969) Influence of local geology on earthquake ground motion. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology

http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~rmellors/index.html

Jia J (2016) Soil dynamics and foundation modeling: offshore and earthquake engineering. Springer, Heidelberg

Bungum H, Selnes PB (1988) Earthquake loading on the Norwegian continental shelf. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo

Evison FF (1955) A coal seam as a guide for seismic energy. Nature 176:1224–1225CrossRef

Gutenberg B (1955) Channel waves in the Earth’s crust. Geophysics 20(2):283–294CrossRef

10.

Ewing M, Press MF, Worzel JL (1952) Further study of T phase. Bull Seismol Soc Am 42:37–51

11.

Irvine T (2006) Vibration data. Newsletter, June, 2006

12.

Chen CT, Millero FJ (1977) Speed of sound in seawater at high pressures. J Acoust Soc Am 62(5):1129–1135CrossRef

13.

Chopra AK (2000) Dynamics of structures: theory and application to earthquake engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

14.

Chen WF, Lui EM (2006) Earthquake engineering for structural design, 1st edn. CRC Press, London

15.

UPSeis. www.geo.mtu.edu

16.

Allin Cornell C (1988) Presidential address to seismological society of America

17.

Kalkan E, Graizer V (2007) Multi-component ground motion response spectra for coupled horizontal, vertical, angular accelerations and Tilt. Paper no. 485. ISET J Earthq Technol 44(1):259–284

18.

Bouchon M, Aki K (1982) Strain, tilt, and rotation associated with strong ground motion in the vicinity of earthquake faults. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1717–1738

19.

Graizer VM (1989) Bearing on the problem of inertial seismometry, Izvestiya. Phys Solid Earth 25(1):26–29

20.

Graizer VM (1991) Inertial seismometry methods, Izvestiya. Phys Solid Earth 27(1):51–61

21.

Hart GC, Lew M, DiJulio RM (1975) Torsional response of high-rise buildings. J Struct Div Proc ASCE 101(ST2):397–414

22.

Bycroft GN (1980) Soil–foundation interaction and differential ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8(5):397–404CrossRef

23.

Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI, Ivanović SS (1996) Peak velocities and peak surface strains during Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(5):301–310CrossRef

24.

Ariman T, Muleski GE (1981) A review of the response of buried pipelines under seismic excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 9(2):133–152CrossRef

25.

Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI (1998) Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 17(1):41–51CrossRef

26.

Richter CF (1935) An instrumental earthquake scale. Bull Seismol Soc Am 25:1–32

27.

Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145

28.

China Earthquake Administration, GB 17740–1999, General Ruler for Earthquake Magnitude, 1999

29.

Lay T, Wallace TC (1955) Modern global seismology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 521

30.

Norwegian Seismic Array (NORSAR) (1998) Seismic zonation for Norway, prepared for Norwegian Council for Building Standardization by NORSAR and Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, 1998

31.

Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84(B5):2348–2350CrossRef

32.

Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

33.

Bullen KE, Bolt BA (1985) An introduction to the theory of seismology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATH

34.

Idriss IM, Archuleta RJ (2007) Evaluation of earthquake ground motions. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Wahington, DC

35.

Ambrasseys NN, Jackson JA (1998) Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquake in Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys J Int 133:390–406CrossRef

36.

Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

37.

Srbulov M (2008) Geotechnical earthquake engineering: simplified analyses with case studies and examples. Springer, Heidelberg

38.

Abercrombie RE (1995) Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at a 2.5 km depth. J Geophys Res 100:B12

39.

Chen W-F, Scawthorn C (2003) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press, London

40.

Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) (2004) Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

41.

Zhou XY, Hu YX (2001) An overview and preview of China-US joint research on earthquake engineering. In: Spencer BF Jr, Hu YX (eds) Earthquake engineering frontiers in the new millennium. Swets & Zeitinger BV, Lisse

42.

Riks E (1972) The application of Newton’s method to the problem of elastic stability. J Appl Mech 39:1060–1065MATHCrossRef

43.

Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND, Fragiadakis M (2006) Seismic design procedures in the framework of evolutionary based structural optimization, computational mechanics? Solids, structures and coupled problems. Springer, NetherlandsMATH

44.

Conte JP (1992) Effects of earthquake frequency nonstationary on inelastic structural response. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp 3645–3651

45.

Paradimitriou K, Beck JL (1992) Stochastic characterization of ground motion and applications to structural response. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp 835–844

46.

Wang J, Zhou J (1997) The influence of non-stationarity of seismic motions on the nonlinear response of structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 17(2):16–20

47.

Naga P (2011) Analyzing the effect of moving resonance on seismic response of structures using wavelet transforms. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

48.

Bobby Motwani, Are we Ready for … “EI Centro”? www.bobbyness.net, 2010

49.

Mualchin L, Jones AL (1992) Peak acceleration from maximum credible earthquakes in California (rock and stiff soil sites). California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 92–1

50.

Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Bommer JJ (2014) Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and Middle East. Bull Earthq Eng 12(1):359–387CrossRef

51.

Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033CrossRef

52.

Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011–2038

53.

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion predictions for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2181–2205CrossRef

54.

Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:501–520

55.

Cornell CA, Banon H, Shakal AF (1979) Seismic motion and response prediction alternatives. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 7(4):295–315CrossRef

56.

Boore D, Atkinson G (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–138CrossRef

57.

Idriss IM (2008) An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 24(1):217–242CrossRef

58.

Chiou BSJ, Darragh R, Silva W (2008) An overview of the NGA database. Earthq Spectra 24:23–44CrossRef

59.

Chintanapakdee C, Naguit ME, Charoenyuth M (2008) Suitable attenuation model for Thailand. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

60.

Boore DM, Joyner W, Fumal T (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North America earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153CrossRef

61.

Ambraseys N, Douglas J, Sarma S, Smit P (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3:1–53CrossRef

62.

Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):94–109CrossRef

63.

Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average of horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24(1):173–216CrossRef

64.

Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):154–179CrossRef

65.

Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5 % damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):139–171CrossRef

66.

Esteva L, Villaverde R (1973) Seismic risk, design spectra and structural reliability. In: Proceedings of the Fifth world conference on earthquake engineering, Rome

67.

Idriss IM (1993) Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites. Report to National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis, Report No. NIST GCR, pp 93–625

68.

Sadigh K, Chang C, Egan J, Makdisi F, Youngs R (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):180–189CrossRef

69.

Spudich P, Fletcher J, Hellweg M, Boatwright J, Sullivan C, Joyner W, Hanks T, Boore D, McGarr A, Baker L, Lindh A (1997) SEA96-A new predictive relation for earthquake ground motions in extensional tectonic regimes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):190–198CrossRef

70.

Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1987) Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong motion records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1491–1513

71.

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1997) Some comparisons between recent ground motion relations. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):24–40CrossRef

72.

Dahle A, Climent A, Taylor W, Bungum H, Santos P, Ciudad Real M, Lindholm C, Strauch W, Segura F (1995) New spectral strong motion attenuation models for Central America. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on seismic zonation, Oct 17–19, Nice, France

73.

Hwang H, Huo J (1997) Attenuation relations of ground motions for rock and soil sites in eastern united states. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:363–372CrossRef

74.

Toro GR (2002) Modification of the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances. Risk Eng 4-1–4-10

75.

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1997) Stochastic point-source modeling of ground motions in Cascadia Region. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):74–85CrossRef

76.

Crouse CB (1991) Ground motion attenuation equation for earthquakes on Cascadia subduction zones. Earthq Spectra 7(2):201–236CrossRef

77.

Fukushima Y, Tanaka T (1991) A new attenuation relation for peak horizontal acceleration of strong earthquake ground motion in Japan. Shimizu Tech Res Bull 1(10):1–11

78.

Megawati K, Pan T, Koketsu K (2005) Response spectral attenuation relationships for sumatran-subduction earthquakes and the seismic hazard implications to Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(1):11–25CrossRef

79.

Petersen MD, Mueller C, Harmsen S, Frankel AD, Rukstales K, Dewey J, Hartzell S (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Sumatra, Indonesia and across the southern Malaysian Peninsula. Tectonophysics 390:141–158CrossRef

80.

Zhao JX, Lu M (2011) Magnitude-scaling rate in ground-motion prediction equations for response spectra from large, shallow crustal earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(6):2643–2661CrossRef

81.

Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):67–97CrossRef

82.

Zhao JX (2011) Magnitude scaling in ground motion prediction equations for response spectra from large subduction interface earthquakes from Japan. In: Fourth IASPEI/IAEE international symposium on effects of surface geology on seismic motion, University of California Santa Barbara, Aug 23–26

83.

Douglas J (2004) Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003. Reissue of ESEE Report 01-1: a comprehensive worldwide summary of strong motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969 to 2000), Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Soil Mechanics Section, Report 04-001-SM, Imperial College, London, UK

84.

Douglas J (2006) Errata of and additions to: ground motion estimation equations 1964–3003, Intermediary Report BRGM/RP-54603-FR

85.

Housner GW (1956) Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes. In: First conference on earthquake engineering, EERI, Berkeley

86.

Akiyama H (1985) Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings. University of Tokyo Press, Japan

87.

Cheng Y, Lucchini A, Mollaioli F (2014) Correlation of elastic input energy equivalent velocity spectral values. Earthq Struct Int J 7(4):485–510CrossRef

88.

Sari A (2003) Energy considerations in ground motion attenuation and probabilistic seismic hazard studies site. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin

89.

Uang CM, Bertero VV (1988) Use of energy as a design criterion in earthquake-resistant design. Report No: UCB/EERC-88/18, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California at Berkeley

90.

Kuwamura H, Galambos TV (1989) Earthquake load for structural reliability. J Struct Eng ASCE 115(6):1446–1462CrossRef

91.

Chapman MC (1999) On the use of elastic input energy for seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 15(4):607–635CrossRef

92.

Chou CC, Uang CM (2000) An evaluation of seismic energy demand: an attenuation approach. PEER Report 2000/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

93.

Leelataviwat S, Goel SC, Stojadinovic B (2002) Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift. J Struct Eng 128(8):1046–1054CrossRef

94.

Denolle MA, Dunham EM, Prieto GA, Beroza GC (2013) Ground motion prediction of realistic earthquake sources using the ambient seismic field. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118:1–17CrossRef

95.

Olsen KB, Day SM, Minster JB, Cui Y, Chourasia A, Faerman M, Moore R, Maechling P, Jordan T (2006) Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 33:7

96.

Tanimoto T, Alvizuri C (2006) Inversion of the HZ ratio of microseisms for S-wave velocity in the crust. Geophys J Int 165:323–335CrossRef

97.

Koper KD, Seats K, Benz H (2011) On the composition of Earth’s short-period seismic noise field. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(2):606–617CrossRef

98.

Baker JW (2008) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

99.

Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) (2004) Earthquake engineering: from engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

100.

Douglas J (2011) Ground-motion prediction equations 1964–2010. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, California

101.

http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports.html

102.

Elnashai AS, Di Sarno L (2008) Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. Wiley, UKCrossRef

103.

Snaebjornsson JT, Sigbjörnsson R (2008) The duration characteristics of earthquake ground motions. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing

104.

Sucuoğlu H, Yücemen S, Gezer A, Erberik A (1998) Statistical evaluation of the damage potential of earthquake ground motions. Struct Saf 20(4):357–378CrossRef

105.

Ruiz García J (2010) On the influence of strong-ground motion duration on residual displacement demands. Earthq Struct 1:327–344CrossRef

106.

Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A (1996) The prediction of strong motion duration for engineering design. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Mexico, Acapulco, paper no. 84, 1996

107.

Izuru T (2007) Critical excitation methods in earthquake engineering, 1st edn. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford

108.

Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A (1999) The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. J Earthq Eng 3(2):127–172

109.

Trifunac MD, Westermo BD (1982) Duration of strong earthquake shaking. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 1(3):117–121

110.

Bolt BA (1969) Duration of strong motion. In: Proceedings of the fourth conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile, pp 1304–1315

111.

Bolt B (1973) Duration of strong motion. In: Proceedings of the fifth world conference on earthquake engineering, Rome, Italy, 6D, paper no. 292

112.

Lee J, Green RA (2012) An empirical bracketed duration relation for stable continental regions of North America. Earthq Struct 3(1):1–15CrossRef

113.

Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) A Study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:581–626

114.

Stafford PJ, Berrill JB, Pettinga JR (2009) New predictive equations for Arias Intensity from crustal earthquakes in New Zealand. J Seismol 13(1):31–52CrossRef

115.

Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hanson RJ (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 438–489

116.

Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) A study on the duration of earthquake strong motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:581–626

117.

Chai YH, Fajfar P, Romstad KM (1998) Formulation of duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectrum. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(8):913–921CrossRef

118.

Raghunandan M, Liel B (2013) Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse. Struct Saf 41:119–133CrossRef

119.

Chandramohan R, Baker JW, Deierlein GG (2015) Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records. Earthq Spectra. doi:10.1193/122813EQS298MR2

120.

Tiwari AK, Gupta VK (2000) Scaling of ductility and damage-based strength reduction factors for horizontal motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29(7):969–987CrossRef

121.

Hou H, Qu B (2015) Duration effect of spectrally matched ground motions on seismic demands of elastic perfectly plastic SDOFS. Eng Struct 90:48–60CrossRef

122.

Sarma SK, Casey BJ (1990) Duration of strong motion in earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the ninth European conference on earthquake engineering, Moscow, USSR, vol 10A, pp 174–183

123.

Nelson SA (2011) Earthquake prediction, control and mitigation (lecture notes). Tulane University, Sept, 2011

124.

Diep F (2011) Fast facts about the Japan earthquake and tsunami. Scientific American, March, 2011

125.

Chang FK, Krinitzsky EL (1977) Duration, spectral content, and predominant period of strong motion earthquake records from western United States. Miscellaneous paper 5-73-1, US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi

126.

Esteva L, Rosenblueth E (1964) Espectros de temblores a distancias moderadas y grandes. Bol SMIS Mexico 2(1):1–18

127.

Dobry R, Idriss IM, Ng E (1978) Duration characteristic of horizontal components of strong motion earthquake records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 68(5):1487–1520

128.

Herrmann RB (1985) An extension of random vibration theory estimates of strong ground motion to large distances. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1447–1453

129.

Ambraseys NN, Smit PM, Douglas J, Margaris B, Sigbjörnsson R, Ólafsson S (2004) Internet site for European strong motion data. B Geofis Teor Appl 45(3):113–129

130.

Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Shoghian Z, Sheikh MN (2014) A new model for the prediction of earthquake ground-motion duration in Iran. Nat Hazards 70(1):69–92CrossRef

131.

McGuire RK, Barnhard TP (1979) The usefulness of ground motion duration in prediction of severity shaking. In: Proceedings of the second national conference on earthquake engineering, Stanford, CA, pp 713–722

132.

Kamiyama M (1984) Effect of subsoil conditions and other factors on the duration of earthquake ground shaking. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, vol 2, pp 793–800

133.

Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1996) Empirical ground motion models. Report to Brookhaven National Laboratory

134.

Bruno H, Fabrice C (2000) Empirical determination of ground shaking duration due to an earthquake using strong motion accelerograms for engineering applications. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, 12–18 Oct, paper no. 2254

135.

Kempton JJ, Stewart PJ (2000) Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions consideration site and near-source effects. Earthq Spectra 22:958–1013

136.

Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ, Alarcón JA (2009) Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(6):3217–3233CrossRef

137.

Godinho J (2007) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. University of Patras, Greece

138.

Stewart JP, Chiou S, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville PG, Abrahamson NA (2001) Ground Motion evaluation procedures for performance based design. PEER report 2001/09, PEER Center, College of Engineering, UC Berkley

139.

Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, p 134

140.

Eurocode 8 (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, 2004

141.

Douglas J (2003) What is a poor quality strong motion record? Bull Earthq Eng 1(1):141–156CrossRef

Titel: Characterize Ground Motions
verfasst von: Junbo Jia
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Modern Earthquake Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31853-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-31854-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31854-2_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"