Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction to ‘Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development’ Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Using MapTable® to Learn About Sustainable Urban Development

verfasst von : Peter Pelzer, Gustavo Arciniegas, Stan Geertman, Jaap de Kroes

Erschienen in: Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sustainable urban development is a critical issue in the Netherlands. The country is densely populated, which causes conflicts between environmental concerns and spatial development. Environmental policy integration is proposed as a way to improve the integration of environmental values into spatial planning with the help of learning processes. This chapter evaluates the extent to which the combination of a map-based touch table and an area-specific environmental profile are of added value to environmental policy integration. The case study is the application of the map-based touch table, called MapTable® for the development of a sustainable neighborhood in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands. It was found that MapTable® facilitates learning processes by providing a platform for communication among stakeholders from different backgrounds. Nonetheless, it must be ensured that all stakeholders are equally included, and that the process suits the application of a map-based touch table in combination with an area-specific environmental profile.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Generalisation of Planning Data as a Contribution to Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEA): The Example of a City-Wide Biotope-Type Assessment for Berlin
Nächstes Kapitel Ecosystem Services, Green Infrastructure and the Role of Planning Support Systems
Fußnoten
1
Since the use of specific jargon, brand names, and abbreviations might be somewhat confusing, the following table presents the central terms.
Generic term
In the Rijnenburg case study
Map-based touch table
MapTable®
GIS software
ArcGIS® and CommunityViz®
Area-specific environmental profile
Sustainability profile of the location (SPL)
 
Literatur
Alexander KA, Janssen R, Arciniegas GA, O’Higgins TG, Eikelboom T, Wilding TA (2012) Interactive marine spatial planning: siting tidal energy arrays around the mull of Kintyre. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30031. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0030031 CrossRef
Arciniegas G (2012) Map-based decision support tools for collaborative land use planning. Free University Amsterdam PhD thesis
Benford R, Snow D (2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Ann Rev Sociol 26:611–639CrossRef
Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Brussels
Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):296–312CrossRef
Carton L (2007) Map making and map use in a multi-actor context: spatial visualizations and frame conflicts in regional policymaking in the Netherlands. PhD thesis, TU Delft
De Roo G, Visser J, Zuidema C (2012) Smart Methods for Environmental Externalities. Ashgate, Farnham
Dieber M (2003) Paint the town: lessons learned. 2nd annual conference on PPGIS, urban and regional information systems association. In: Proceedings of the conference on public participation GIS (PPGIS), Portland, 20–22 July 2003
Geertman S (2006) Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 33:863–880CrossRef
Geertman S (2008) Planning support systems: a planner’s perspective. In: Brail (2008, ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Use Policy, Cambridge, pp 213–30
Geertman S, Stillwell J (2009) Planning support systems: best practices and new methods. Springer/GeoJournal Library, Berlin, p 95
Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper Colophon, New York
Healey P (1992) Planning through debate. The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Plan Rev 63(2):143–162
Healey P (2007) Urban complexity and spatial strategies. Towards a relational planning for our times. Routledge, Oxon/New York
Hoeven der EJ, van der Aarts JH, van der Klis, Koomen E (2009) An integrated discussion support system for new Dutch flood risk management strategies, in planning support systems: best practices and new methods. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) (Springer/GeoJournal Library 95, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York), pp 74–159
Hofstra H, Scholten H, Zlatanova S, Scotta A (2008) Multi-user tangible interfaces for effective decision-making in disaster management. In: Nayak S, Zlatanova S (eds) Remote sensing and GIS technologies for monitoring and prediction of disasters. Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin, pp 243–266CrossRef
Innes J, Booher D (2010) Planning with complexity. An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge, Oxon
Lafferty W, Hovden E (2003) Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ Polit 12(1):1–22CrossRef
McElvaney S (2012) Geodesign: case studies in regional and urban planning. ESRI Press, Redlands
Nilsson M, Persson A (2003) Framework for analyzing environmental policy integration. J Environ Policy Plan 5(4):333–359CrossRef
Nilsson M (2005) Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Environ Plan C: Gov Policy 23(2):207–226CrossRef
Pelzer P (2012) Planning knowledge through technology: potentials for PSS from the knowledge debate. Paper presented at the 12th international conference on design and decision support systems in architecture and urban planning, Eindhoven, The Netherlands 27–29 Aug 2012
Rein M, Schön D (1994) Frame reflection. Toward the resolution on intractable policy controversies. Basic Books, New York
Rydin Y (2010) Governing for sustainable urban development. Earthscan, London
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Temple Smith, London
Simeonova V, Van der Valk A (2009) The need for a communicative approach to improve environmental policy integration in urban land use. J Plan Lit 23(2):241CrossRef
Te Brömmelstroet M (2010) Making planning support systems matter: improving the use of planning support systems for integrated land use and transport strategy-making. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam
Uittenbroek C Runhaar H, Janssen-Jansen L (2013) Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Reg Environ Change 13:399–411. doi:10.​1007/​s10113-012-0348-8
Weber M, Driessen P (2010) Environmental policy integration: the role of policy windows in the integration of noise and spatial planning. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 28:1120–1134CrossRef
Zanon B (2010) Planning small regions in a larger Europe: spatial planning as a learning process for sustainable local development. Eur Plan Stud 18(2):2049–2072CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Using MapTable® to Learn About Sustainable Urban Development
verfasst von
Peter Pelzer
Gustavo Arciniegas
Stan Geertman
Jaap de Kroes
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37532-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-37533-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_10