Skip to main content

Reforming the Common European Asylum System — Legislative developments and judicial activism of the European Courts

  • Book
  • © 2014

Overview

  • Provides an original account of the underlying tensions between the two conflicting rationales upon which CEAS rests, i.e. a security paradigm and a rights-based approach, using the “lens” of sovereignty as an essentially contested concept
  • Provides fresh insights into recent legislative and judicial developments in EU asylum law
  • Provides detailed comparative analysis of the asylum case-law of the ECtHR and the ECJ vis-à-vis the ECHR and the EUCFR
  • Critically reflects on the constitutional relationship between the two European Courts and how it impacts on asylum-seekers’ rights and the future of CEAS
  • Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Law (BRIEFSLAW)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (5 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

In June 2013, after lengthy and complex negotiations the EU adopted the recast “asylum package” which represents a significant step forward in the future development of CEAS.

In this timely study Velluti provides fresh insights into recent legislative and judicial developments in asylum and through the “lens” of sovereignty she looks at some of the contemporary challenges faced by the EU protection regime, with a particular focus on asylum-seekers’ rights.

The volume assesses whether the EU provides an adequate framework for protecting those seeking international protection from the opposing perspectives of effectiveness and fairness. It shows that, despite the newly adopted “second-generation” legislative acts which include changes aimed at ensuring a stronger level of protection for asylum-seekers, the reform process at European level does not adequately ensure an equal standard of protection across all Member States.

Through a comparative analysis of selected ECtHR and ECJ asylum cases the book also examines the constitutional relationship between the two European Courts and how it impacts on the human rights of asylum-seekers and on the future of EU asylum law.  

Ultimately, the book shows that real progress in the development of the human rights dimension of CEAS will be achieved largely through the European and domestic courts. 

Authors and Affiliations

  • College of Social Science Faculty of Business and Law, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom

    Samantha Velluti

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us