Skip to main content

Apparent Contours of Embedded Surfaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shape Reconstruction from Apparent Contours

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 44))

  • 1016 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we adapt the notions introduced in Chap. 2 to the special case of the apparent contour of a smooth, possibly nonconnected, compact surface \(\Sigma \) without boundary embedded in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\). Embeddedness allows to enrich an apparent contour with a labelling, which, in particular, permits to define the visible contour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recall that closed here means compact without boundary.

  2. 2.

    We advise the reader that in some of the figures, it will be convenient to imagine the x 1 x 2 plane as horizontal, with the z direction being vertical, and e 3 pointing downwards.

  3. 3.

    We shall show a completion theorem starting only from the visible part of the apparent contour.

  4. 4.

    We shall show a reconstruction theorem of a three-dimensional shape starting from the knowledge of the whole apparent contour, and of a consistent labelling on it.

  5. 5.

    Following, e.g., [9], a smooth embedding of M into \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) is a smooth injective map having differential of rank 2 (maximal) at all points of M.

  6. 6.

    See [13] for stability theorems of composite mappings.

  7. 7.

    This could be achieved also in terms of small changes in the viewing direction, as in [16, 17].

  8. 8.

    The critical curve divides, with the terminology of [16], the “anterior” surfaces from the “posterior” ones.

  9. 9.

    Compare with Remark 2.2.6 which deals with a more general case.

  10. 10.

    For simplicity, in the present example, the set E is not disjoint from the retinal plane. Clearly, this assumption is irrelevant.

  11. 11.

    Note that e 3 is the tangent vector to the critical curve at the origin, thus coinciding with the kernel of \(d\pi _{\vert \Sigma }\).

  12. 12.

    The function \(d_{\Sigma }\) is not defined at a crossing, where it could be defined as a multifunction taking two nonnegative integer values: we shall not need such an extension.

  13. 13.

    For results concerning the number of cusps of apparent contours in general contexts, see [15, p. 409], [14, p. 84].

  14. 14.

    As already anticipated in the Introduction, the existence of a labelling satisfying all compatibility conditions makes possible the construction of an abstract smooth surface M and a smooth embedding \(\mathrm{e}: M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3}\) so that \(\Sigma = \mathrm{e}(M)\); see Theorem 5.3.1 for a precise statement.

  15. 15.

    Recall that a closed surface embedded in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) encloses an interior, hence an outward normal is well defined; see, for instance, [10, p. 89].

  16. 16.

    Notice carefully that the signs + and − in Fig. 8.1 refer to the embedding sign of a cusp Definition 8.1.2), and not to the notion of positivity and negativity of Definition 2.2.12.

  17. 17.

    Hence h 1 preserves the orientation of the arcs.

  18. 18.

    This list of properties originates the definition of visible contour graph given in Chap. 4: indeed, the visible contour is a visible contour graph in the sense of Definition 4.1.8.

References

  1. Arnold, V.I., Goryunov, V.V., Lyashko, O.V., Vassiliev, V.A.: Dynamical Systems VIII. In: Arnold, V.I. (ed.) Singularity Theory. II. Applications. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, V.I., Gusein-Zade, S.M., Varchenko, A.N.: Singularities of Differentiable Maps, Volume I. Birkhäuser, Boston (1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellettini, G., Beorchia, V., Paolini, M.: Topological and variational properties of a model for the reconstruction of three-dimensional transparent images with self-occlusions. J. Math. Imaging Vision 32, 265–291 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellettini, G., Beorchia, V., Paolini, M.: Completion of visible contours. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2, 777–799 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruce, J.W., Giblin, P.J.: Curves and Singularities. A Geometrical Introduction to Singularity Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, J.S., Kamada, S., Saito, M.: Surfaces in 4-Space, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 142. Springer, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, J.S., Saito, M.: Knotted Surfaces and Their Diagrams, Mathematical Surveys Monographs, vol. 55. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Francis, G.K.: A Topological Picturebook. Springer, New York (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Golubitsky, M., Guillemin, V.: Stable Mappings and Their Singularities, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 14. Springer, New York/Heidelberg/Berlin (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guillemin, V., Pollack, A.: Differential Topology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ/Prentice-Hall (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Huffman, D.A.: Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 6. American Elsevier, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koenderink, J.J.: Solid Shape. MIT, Cambridge, MA/London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakai, I.: Topological stability theorem for composite mappings. Ann. Inst. Fourier 39, 459–500 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Thom, R.: Les singularités des applications différentiables. Ann. Inst. Fourier 6, 43–87 (1956)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitney, H.: On singularities of mappings of Euclidean spaces. I. Mappings of the plane into the plane. Ann. Math. 62, 374–410 (1955)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, L.R.: Perceptual completion of occluded surfaces. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, L.R.: Topological reconstruction of a smooth manifold-solid from its occluding contour. Int. J. Comput. Vision 23, 93–108 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bellettini, G., Beorchia, V., Paolini, M., Pasquarelli, F. (2015). Apparent Contours of Embedded Surfaces. In: Shape Reconstruction from Apparent Contours. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 44. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45191-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45191-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45191-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics