Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Accident Analysis and Issues

verfasst von : Atomic Energy Society of Japan

Erschienen in: The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident

Verlag: Springer Japan

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Chapters 2–5 presented an outline of Nuclear Power Station, an overview of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi NPS, an overview of the events that took place at nuclear power stations other than the Fukushima Daiichi, and responses to the accident outside the power station based on fact. In keeping with these facts, Chap. 6 analyzes and evaluates the accident from various perspectives. First, the items of the analysis in Chap. 6 are explained, the accident progression behavior is simulated, and the findings from the evaluation of the releases of radioactive materials during the accident are presented in Sect. 6.1. Second, each item is analyzed and evaluated and the relevant issues are addressed in Sect. 6.2 and subsequent sections.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Interim Report of the Special Committee on Safety Goals for Nuclear Safety Installations in Japan, Commission,” Special Committee on Safety Goals, Nuclear Safety Commission, December 2003.
 
2
“Scientific and reasonable rules” is a typical representation, but “reasonable” often elicits misunderstanding. “logical” is therefore used in this paragraph as rules that are logically structured based on certain concept and principle.
 
3
NUREG-1560, Individual Plant Examination Program: Perspectives on Reactor Safety and Plant Performance, December (1997).
 
4
NUREG-1742, Perspectives Gained from the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) Program, April 2002.
 
5
IAEA, Severe Accident Management.
 
6
Review Guide for Safety Design of Nuclear Power Reactors, Nuclear Safety Commission.
 
7
Accident Management, Nuclear Safety Commission, 1992 (revised in 1997, abolished in 2010)
 
8
“Multiple defence” is the term used in the original text, but “defence in depth” is used in this document to avoid misunderstanding that defence is achieved by redundant installation of engineering facilities.
 
10
For example, classification by significance of risk and a relevant response is selected to achieve goals.
 
11
Resilience: Methods and capacity of restoring the required function to safety assurance level as a system to respond to an incident or accident.
 
12
Flexibility of responses.
 
13
According to the classification of importance, the IC as the “safety equipment” is “classified as (1) the building, system or equipment used to shut down the reactor in an emergency, remove residual heat, prevent overpressure at the reactor coolant boundary, and mitigate significant impact of radiation on local residents,” and one of residual heat removal systems in BWR, specifically as “(4) the building, system or equipment to remove residual heat after reactor shutdown.”
 
14
AESJ standard “Development, maintaining and improvement of severe accident management in nuclear power plants:2014” (Note: The accident management and severe accident management are used as the same term here.)
 
15
Protective actions which can be implemented within days to weeks and still be effective.
 
16
Radiation source accident in Brazil, 1987.
 
17
Criticality accident in Japan, 1999 at the JCO uranium-conversion plant in Tokaimura.
 
18
Protective actions which must be taken promptly (normally within hours) in order to be effective, and the effectiveness of which will be markedly reduced if they are delayed.
 
19
Predetermined conditions and instrument readings in the nuclear power plant, if exceeded the staff will immediately notify off-site officials to issue a coordinated response order.
 
20
Government Accident Investigation Committee Report Chapter V.
 
Literatur
1.
IAEA, Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants 75-INSAG-3 Rev.1, INSAG-12 (IAEA, 1999)
2.
IAEA, IAEA Safety Standards, Fundamental Safety Principles No. SF-1 (IAEA, 2006)
3.
AESJ-SC-TR005, Fundamental Concept on Nuclear Safety – Nuclear Safety Objectives and Fundamental Safety Principles, Technical Report by Standards Committee, Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ-SC-TR005, 2012)
4.
Special Committee, Nuclear Safety Commission, Interim Report on the Investigation and Review on Safety Goals (Special Committee, Nuclear Safety Commission, 2003)
5.
USNRC, Recommendation for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century, The Near Term Task Force (USNRC, 2011)
6.
IAEA, Safety Reports Series No. 46, Assessment of Defence in depth for Nuclear Power Plants (IAEA 2005)
7.
IAEA, Defence in depth in Nuclear Safety, INSAG-10 (IAEA, 1996)
8.
IAEA, Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants 75-INSAG-3 Rev. 1, INSAG-12 (IAEA, 1999)
9.
Interim and Final Reports of the Japanese Government Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, Medialand (2012)
10.
IAEA Mission Report, The Great East Japan Earthquake Expert Mission, IAEA International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (2011)
11.
The Diet Accident Investigative Committee Report, TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee report (Tokuma Shoten Publishing, 2012)
12.
H. Miyano, N. Sekimura, K. Demachi, S. Arai, M. Matsumoto, 10th Academic Lecture Summaries, Japan Society of Maintenance (2013), pp. 329–335
13.
Nuclear Regulation Authority Project Report, Nuclear Regulation Authority, FY 2004 Deterioration Technology Evaluation Enhancement Project (Nuclear Regulation Authority, 2004)
14.
Japanese Standard Association, Method of Determining the Repassivation Potential for Crevice Corrosion of Stainless Steels, JIS G 0592 (Japanese Standard Association, 2002)
15.
M. Akashi, G. Nakayama, T. Fukuda, Corrosion 98, 158 (1998)
16.
M. Sakiya, R. Matsuhashi, T. Mastuhashi, A. Takahashi, Mater. Environ. 58, 378 (2009)
17.
M. Kobayashi, T. Narabayashi, Maintenance Technology. Jpn. Soc. Mainten. J. 12(2), 84–93; T. Narabayashi, Japan Society of Maintenology publication “Maintenology” (2013)
18.
UNSCEAR, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation (UNSCEAR, New York, 2010)
19.
ICRP, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007)
20.
R.R.K. Nair et al., Background Radiation and Cancer Induce in Kerala, India-Karunagappally Cohort Study. Health Phys., 96(1), 55–66 (2009)
21.
Act on Special Measures concerning the Handling of Environment Pollution by Radioactive Materials Discharged by the NPS Accident Associated with the Tohoku District – Off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake That Occurred on March 11 (Act No. 110 of August 30, 2011), posted on the website of the Ministry of the Environment together with relevant government and ministerial decrees http://​env.​go.​jp/​jishin/​rmp/​.​html
22.
23.
ICRP, A Application of the Commission’s Recommendations to the Protection of People Living in Long-term Contaminated Areas after a Nuclear Accident or a Radiation Emergency, ICRP Publication 111 (ICRP, 2008)
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Nuclear Safety Commission, Environmental Radiation Monitoring Guideline (Nuclear Safety Commission, 2010), p. 51
31.
M. Kayano, At. Energy Soc. Jpn. J. 55, 220–224 (2013)
32.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Disaster Countermeasure Guideline (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2012)
33.
34.
35.
Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Atomic Energy Society of Japan standard, Implementation Standard on Probabilistic Safety Assessment Targeting Output Operation of Nuclear Power Plant (Level 2, PSA): 2008, AESJ-SC-P009: 2008 (Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 2009)
36.
G.E. Wilson, B.E. Bouyak, Nucl. Eng. Des., 186, 23–37 (1998)
37.
D. Magallon, A. Malliat et al., Nucl. Eng. Des., 235, 209–346 (2005)
38.
S. Kinase, M. Kimura, S. Takahara, T. Homma, Evaluation of averted doses to infants by tap water restrictions after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident. Trans. At. Energy Soc. Jpn. 10(3), 149–151 (2011)CrossRef
39.
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Measures for Radioactive Material in the Tap Water, Interim Report. Study Meeting of Measures for Radioactive Material in the Tap Water (Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, 2011)
40.
Discover Twentyone, Independent Investigation Committee on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident, Report of Investigation and Verification (Discover Twentyone, 2012), p. 342
41.
Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi, Nuclear Accident Report of investigation and verification. (Discover Twentyone, 2012), p. 343
42.
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, Guideline for the Regulatory Authority to Evaluate Licensees’ Efforts to Prevent Degradation of Safety Culture and Organizational Climate deterioration (Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization, 2007)
43.
44.
IAEA, Nuclear Security Culture (2008)
45.
Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy Nuclear and Industrial Safety Subcommittee Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Subcommittee, Concerning response to internal threat(insider) in the nuclear facilities (Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy Nuclear and Industrial Safety Subcommittee Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Subcommittee, 2005)
46.
Atomic Energy Commission Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee on Nuclear Security, Strengthening of Japan’s Nuclear Security Measures (Atomic Energy Commission Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee on Nuclear Security, 2012)
47.
IAEA, INSAG-24 Interface between the safety and the security of the nuclear power plant (2011)
48.
Example of Regulation document about the measurement control: NRC:PART 74, DOE-STD-1194-2011
49.
Interim report by the Government Investigation Committee on the Accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station of Tokyo Electric Power, Study Committee (Main ver.) (2011)
50.
TEPCO, Investigation Committee on the Accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station (Main ver.), (Attached documents) (2012)
51.
52.
A. Ishibashi, D. Karikawa, M. Takahashi, T. Wakabayashi, M. Kitamura, J. At. Energy Soc. Jpn., 9(4), 384–395 (2010)
53.
54.
Government Investigation Committee on the Accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station of Tokyo Electric Power Company report, verification committee and final report (main-text ver.) (2012)
55.
BTC Training Newsletter, No.89 (April 2012), No.90 (2012)
56.
Technical findings of Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (2012)
57.
Emergency Preparedness Headquarters, Additional Report on International Atomic Energy Agency by Japanese Government- Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident-(2nd Report) (2012)
58.
Japan Nuclear Technology Institute, Lessons Learned from Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station; Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS, INPO 11–005 Addition (2012) (translated by Japan Nuclear Technology Institute)
59.
TEPCO, Accident Analysis Report by the Investigation Committee on the Accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station “Appendix 2: Response Status to the Fukushima Dai-ichi and Dai-ni Nuclear Power Stations” (TEPCO, 2012)
60.
J. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents (Ashgate, 1997)
61.
E. Hollnagel, Safety culture, safety management, and resilience engineering, ATEC, International Aviation Safety Forum (2009)
62.
A. Nakanishi, Requirements for High Reliability Organization (Seisansei Publishing Co., 2007)
63.
Y. Hayashi, Case studies: Introduction to Risk Literacy (Nikkei BP Publishing Co., 2005)
64.
K. Kikuzawa, Unreasonable Organization (Diamond Publishing Co., 2000)
65.
TEPCO, Response to the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, Survey and Lessons Learned from Extracted; Japan Nuclear Safety Institute (Proposal) (2012)
66.
TEPCO, Summary of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Nuclear Safety Reform Plan (2013)
67.
Investigation Committee on the Accidents at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station of Tokyo Electric Power Company, Report by the national Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (2012)
68.
The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, Report, July 5, 2012
69.
Tokyo Electric Power Company, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Summary and Nuclear Safety Reform Plan (Tokyo Electric Power Company, 2013)
70.
Government Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, “Final Report,” July 23, 2012
71.
Government Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), Lessons Learned from the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Special Report INPO 11–005 Addendum, August 2012
72.
Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, “Interim Report,” December 26, 2011
73.
WENRA RHWG, Safety Objectives for New Power Reactors (2009)
74.
GPR/German experts Technical Guidelines, Oct. 19 and 26, 2000
75.
U.S. NRC, NRC-2008-0237, Federal Register, vol 73 (2008), p. 199
76.
U.S. DOE NERAC&GIF, GIF-019-00 (2002)
77.
IAEA Mission Report, 24 May – 2 June 2011
78.
WENRA RHWG, Safety of New NPP designs (2012)
79.
80.
81.
ANS, Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report (2012)
82.
83.
ASME Presidential Task Force report (2012)
84.
J. Buongiorno, R. Ballinger et al., MIT-NSP-TR-025 (2011)
85.
ENSRG, Peer review report, Apr. 25, 2012
86.
EC, Communication on Stress Tests, Oct. 4, 2012
87.
ASN, Complementary Safety Assessments of the French Nuclear Installations (2011)
88.
IRSN, Translation of IRSN report No. 708 (2012)
89.
A. Keramsi, N. Camarcat, ATOMEXPO 2012 Int. Forum, Moscow, Russia, June 4–6, 2012
90.
91.
92.
93.
T. Sata, J. At. Energy Soc. Jpn. 54(7), 434–440 (2012)
94.
S. Tsuchida, J. At. Energy Soc. Jpn. 54(3), 181–183 (2012)
95.
M. Kitamura, J. At. Energy Soc. Jpn. 54(7), 721–726 (2012)
96.
The Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ), the Research Committee of “Nuclear Safety,” the Technology Analysis Subcommittee, Lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (2011)
97.
The Government Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety. The Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, June 2011 [IAEA Report]
98.
The Government Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, IAEA Additional Report, Additional Report of Japanese Government to IAEA – Accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations- (Second Report), September 2011 [IAEA Additional Report]
99.
The JANTI Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Committee, The JANTI Report, Examination of Accident at Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc.’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station and Proposal of Countermeasures (2011)
100.
TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee report, The Interim Report of the Gov’t Accident Investigation Committee, TEPCO Investigative Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, Interim Report (2011)
101.
TEPCO, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report (Interim Report) (2011)
102.
The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA), Technical Knowledge of the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station of Tokyo Electric Power Co., Ind. (Interim Summary) (2012)
103.
Team H2O Project, What should we learn from the severe accidents at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant? Final Report (2011)
104.
Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident, Private Accident Investigation Committee, Investigation and Verification Report, Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident, Discover 21 (2011)
105.
TEPCO, TEPCO Determined Released Amount Fukushima Daiichi Genshiryoku Hatsudensho Jiko ni okeru Hoshasei Busshitsu no Taiki chu heno Hoshutsuryo no Suitei ni tsuite (Estimated Radioactive Material Release into the Air in the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station) (TEPCO, 2012)
106.
TEPCO, Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report (Final Report) [TEPCO Accident Report] (2012)
107.
The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee, TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee report (the National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, 2012)
108.
TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee, TEPCO Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident Investigation Committee (Final Report), July 2012 [Government Accident Investigation Committee]
109.
Nuclear Safety Subcommittee of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ), Seminar on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Report “What was Wrong and What to Do in Future” March 2013
Metadaten
Titel
Accident Analysis and Issues
verfasst von
Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Buch
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident

Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55159-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-4-431-55160-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55160-7_6