Abstract
This essay proposes a genealogical cartography of the emergence of a posthuman turn in critical theory, including feminist theory, based on the convergence of posthumanism with post-anthropocentrism. The former critiques the universalist posture of the idea of ‘Man’ as the alleged ‘measure of all things’. The latter criticizes species hierarchy and the assumption of human exceptionalism. It then explores the implications of the posthuman turn for political subjectivity, notably in terms of the relation between human and nonhuman agents. The essay then critiques the current tendency to create new negative or reactive re-compositions of a new pan-humanity based on vulnerability and fear. The case is made instead for critical posthuman thought and a definition of the subject as nomadic, that is to say: transversal, relational, affective, embedded and embodied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Nobel Prize winning chemist, Paul Crutzen, in 2002 coined the term ‘anthropocene’ to describe our current geological era. This term stresses both the technologically mediated power acquired by our species and its potentially lethal consequences for everyone else.
- 2.
See for instance, The New Scientist review of my book on the posthuman: ‘What’s death to do with it?’, by Cohen (2013), which argues that the posthuman is too important to be left only to academics or rather ‘social science cognoscenti’.
- 3.
Anders Behring Breivik is the Norwegian mass murderer and the confessed perpetuator of the 2011 attacks in Oslo and on the island of Utoya, killing, respectively, eight and 69 people, mostly socialist youth.
- 4.
In 2005, CIA drones struck targets in Pakistan three times; in 2011, there were 76 strikes, by now there are hundreds. Google Earth has designed a special programme to delete the drones’ flying paths from their satellite photos. Drones come in all sorts of sizes: ‘DelFly’, a dragonfly shaped surveillance drone built at the technical university in Delft, weighs less than a gold wedding ring, camera included. On the other end of the scale comes America’s biggest and fastest drone, Avenger (15 mn USA $), which can carry up to 2.7 tonnes of bombs, sensors and other equipment, at more than 740 km per hour.
- 5.
This is radically different from the negative definition of zoe proposed by Giorgio Agamben (1998), who has been taken to task by feminist scholars (Colebrook 2009; Braidotti 2013) for his erasure of feminist perspectives on the politics of natality and mortality and for his indictment of the project of modernity as a whole.
- 6.
Deleuze calls it ‘the Majority subject’ or the Molar centre of being (Deleuze and Guattari 1987). Irigaray calls it ‘the Same’, or the hyper-inflated, falsely universal ‘He’ (Irigaray 1985, 1993), whereas Collins (1991) calls to account the white and Eurocentric bias of this particular subject of humanistic knowledge.
- 7.
In Anti-Oedipus, published in 1972, Deleuze and Guattari go so far as to foresee even the financialization of the economy and the emergence of a system based on debt.
References
Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment and the material self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity. Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Barr, M. (1987). Alien to femininity: Speculative fiction and feminist theory. New York: Greenwood.
Barr, M. (1993). Lost in space. Probing feminist science fiction and beyond. Chapel Hill and London/Chicago University Press/University of North Carolina Press.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Oxford: Blackwell’s.
Beck, U. & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Borradori, G. (2003). Philosophy in a time of terror. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bostrom, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly 53(211), 243–255.
Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora-contesting identities. New York, London: Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (1991). Patterns of dissonance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subject: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses. Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2011a). Nomadic subject: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press (second and enlarged edition).
Braidotti, R. (2011b). Nomadic theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Braidotti, R., & Griet, R. (2012). Nomadology and subjectivity: Deleuze, Guattari and critical disability studies. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory. New developments and directions (pp. 161–178). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Enquiry, 35, 197–222.
Cohen, D. (2013). What’s death to do with it? The New Scientist, May 11, pp. 54–55.
Colebrook, C. (2000). Is sexual difference a problem? In I. Buchanan & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Deleuze and feminist theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Colebrook, C. (2004). Postmodernism is a humanism. Deleuze and equivocity. Women: A Cultural Review, 15(3), 283–307.
Colebrook, C. (2009). Agamben: aesthetics, potentiality, life. South Atlantic Quarterly, 107(1), 107–120.
Colebrook, C. (2014). Sex after life. Open Humanities Press/University of Michigan Press.
Collini, S. (2012). What are Universities for? London: Penguin Books.
Collins, P. H. (1991). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London/New York: Routledge.
Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus. Biotecnology & capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Cornell, D. (2002). The Ubuntu Project with Stellenbosch University. http://www.fehe.org/index.php?id=281. Accessed 8 August 2016.
Creed, B. (1993). The monstrous-feminine. Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. New York, London: Routledge.
Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold. Leibnitz and the baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and schizophrenia I. New York: Viking Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Esposito, R. (2008). Bios. Biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism and new materialism. Differences and relations. Existenz. An International Journal in Philosophy, Religion, Politics and the Arts, 8(2), 26–32.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Franklin, S., Lury, C., & Stacey, J. (2000). Global nature, global culture. London: Sage.
Fraser, M., Kember, S., & Lury, C. (Eds.). (2006). Inventive life. Approaches to the new vitalism. London: Sage.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. Consequences of the biotechnological revolution. London: Profile Books.
Gatens, M., & Lloyd, G. (1999). Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. London, New York: Routledge.
Giffney, N., & Hird, M. J. (2008). Queering the non/human. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Group.
Gilroy, P. (2000). Against race. Imaging political culture beyond the colour line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Grosz, E. (1995). Sexy bodies: The strange carnalities of feminism. London, New York: Routledge.
Guattari, F. (2000). The three ecologies. London: The Athlone Press.
Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Halberstam, J. (2012). Gaga feminism: Sex, gender and the end of normal. Boston: Beacon Press.
Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse. London, New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto. Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Haraway, D. (2014). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Cthulhucene. On-line talk 27 September 2014. Consulted May 4, 2015.
Hayward, E. (2008). More lessons from a starfish: Prefixial flesh and transspeciated selves. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 36(3&4), 64–85 (Fall/Winter).
Hayward, E. (2011). Sensational jellyfish: Aquarium affects and the matter of immersion. Differences, 25(5).
Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Irigaray, L. (1993). An ethics of sexual difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Johnson, B. (1998). The feminist difference: Literature, psychoanalysis, race and gender. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kelly, J. (1979). The double-edged vision of feminist theory. Feminist Studies, 5(1), 216–227.
Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kung, H. (1998). A global ethic for global politics and economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lazzarato, M. (2012). The making of indebted man. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Livingston, J., & Puar, J. K. (2011). Interspecies. Social Text, 29(1), 3–13.
Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: Male and female in western philosophy. London: Methuen.
Lloyd, G. (1994). Part of nature: Self-knowledge in Spinoza’s ethic. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
Lloyd, G. (1996). Spinoza and the ethics. London, New York: Routledge.
MacCormack, P. (2008). Cinesexualities. London: Ashgate.
MacCormack, P. (2012). Posthuman ethics. London: Ashgate.
MacCormack, P. (2014). The animal catalyst. London: Bloomsbury.
MacPherson, C. B. (1962). The theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (1995). What is life? Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Noys, B. (2010). The persistence of the negative. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Olkowski, D. (1999). Gilles Deleuze and the Ruin of representation. Irvine: University of California Press.
Parisi, L. (2004). Abstract sex. Philosophy, bio-technology, and the mutation of desire. London: Continuum Press.
Pearson K. A. (1999). Germinal life. The difference and repetition of Deleuze. London and New York: Routledge.
Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos today. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rich, A. (2001). Arts of the possible: Essays and conversations. New York: W.W. Norton.
Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twentieth-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Said, E. (2004). Humanism and democratic criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions-brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy. The plunder of nature and knowledge. Boston: South End Press.
Sloterdijk, P. (2009). Rules for the human zoo: A response to the ‘letter on humanism’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 12–28.
Smelik, A., & Lykke, N. (Eds.). (2008). Bits of life: Feminism at the intersections of media, bioscience and technology. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press.
Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal thoughts. University of California Press.
Williams, J. (2013). Gilles Deleuze’s difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures . Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3635-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3637-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)