Skip to main content

Open Access Nanotechnology for Developing Countries: Lessons from Open Source Software

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society ((YNTS,volume 2))

Abstract

Experience has shown that there is no quick fix that enables developing countries to benefit from technological development. Even strategies designed with specific social goals in mind rarely succeed unless there is great attention to the details. For instance some observers have claimed that tight intellectual property (IP) protection prevents developing countries from accessing the benefits of emerging technologies and they should, therefore, develop other strategies. In this chapter, Dhanaraj Thakur explores one such strategy—an “open access” system of IP in developing countries. He uses open source software to illustrate the range of possible property arrangements.

This chapter was peer reviewed. It was originally presented at the Workshop on Nanotechnology, Equity, and Equality at Arizona State University on November 22, 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bastani, Behfar, and Dennis Fernandez. 2002. Intellectual property rights in nanotechnology. Thin Solid Films 420–421:472–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazma, Alvis, Pascal Hingamp, John Quackenbush, Gavin Sherlock, Paul Spellman, Chris Stoeckert, John Aach, Wilhelm Ansorge, Catherine A. Ball, Helen C. Causton, Terry Gaasterland, Patrick Glenisson, Frank C. P. Holstege, Irene F. Kim, Victor Markowitz, John C. Matese, Helen Parkinson, Alan Robinson, Ugis Sarkans, Steffen Schulze-Kremer, Jason Stewart, Ronald Taylor, Jaak Vilo, and Martin Vingron. 2001. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nature Genetics 29(4): 365–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Bryan. 2001. Open sourcing nanotechnology research and development: issues and opportunities. Nanotechnology 12(3): 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Bryan. 2004. Applying nanotechnology to the Challenges of global poverty: Strategies for accessible abundance. In First Conference On Advanced Nanotechnology: Research, Applications, And Policy. October 21–24. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi, Birgit R., and T. Pradeep. 2005. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology in developing countries. Current Science 90(5): 645–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Hsinchun, Mihail C. Roco, Li Xin, and Lin Yiling. 2008. Trends in nanotechnology patents. Nature Nanotechnology 3(3): 123–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, Gavin, and David Dekorte. 2006. The problem of patent thickets in convergent technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1093(1): 180–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, Susan E., Isabel Bortagaray, Sonia Gatchair, and Dhanaraj Thakur. 2008. Emerging technologies and social cohesion: Policy options from a comparative study. Paper presented at the PRIME Latin America Conference, September 24–26, 2008. http://prime_mexico2008.xoc.uam.mx/papers/Susan_Cozzens_Emerging_Technologies_a_social_Cohesion.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dravis, Paul. 2003. Open source software—Perspectives for development. Washington, DC: InfoDev—The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einsiedel, Edna F., and Linda Goldenberg. 2004. Dwarfing the social? Nanotechnology lessons from the biotechnology front. Bulletin of Science Technology Society 24(1): 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Limor, and Phillip Torrone. 2008. Open source hardware. In Emerging technology conference, San Diego, March 3–6 2008. San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Mark S., Peter Eastman, Vishal Vaidyanathan, Mike Houston, Scott Legrand, Adam L. Beberg, Daniel L. Ensign, Christopher M. Bruns, and Vijay S. Pande. 2009. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. Journal of Computational Chemistry 30(6): 864–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Rishab Aiyer 2006. Economic impact of open source software on innovation and the competitiveness of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector in the EU. Maastricht, the Netherlands: UNU-MERIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Mohamed H.A. 2005. Nanotechnology: Small things and big changes in the developing world. Science 309(5731): 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessel, Andrew. 2006. Open source biology. In Open Sources 2.0. eds. C. DiBona, D. Cooper, and M. Stone. California: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, Robert, and David Tolfree. 2008. Bridging the micronanomanufacturing gap. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 7(4): 308–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBRD. 2009. World development indicators 2009. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, Noela, and Guillermo Foladori. 2006. Nanomedicine, poverty and development. Development 49: 114–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi, Noela, Guillermo Foladori, and Donald Maclurcan. 2008. Nanotechnology’s controversial role for the South. Science Technology and Society 13(1): 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, Nir. 2004. Economics of linux adoption in developing countries. IEEE Software Jan/Feb: 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lausted, Christopher, Timothy Dahl, Charles Warren, Kimberly King, Kimberly Smith, Michael Johnson, Ramsey Saleem, John Aitchison, Lee Hood, and Stephen Lasky. 2004. POSaM: A fast, flexible, open-source, inkjet oligonucleotide synthesizer and microarrayer. Genome Biology 5(8): R58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemley, Mark A. 2005. Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Review 58(2): 601–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, Michael, Christopher Kelty, Cafer T. Yavuz, and Vicki L. Colvin. 2008. Towards open source nano: Arsenic removal and alternative models of technology transfer. Technology, Innovation and Institutions Working Paper Series TII-1-2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclurcan, Donald C. 2005. Nanotechnology and developing countries. Journal of Nanotechnology Online (September), http://www.azonano.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1428.

  • Prisco, Giulio. 2006. Globalization and open source nano economy Nanotechnology Perceptions: A Review of Ultraprecision Engineering and Nanotechnology 2(1a): 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Lawrence. 2005. Open source licensing—Software freedom and Intellectual Property Law. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamanca-Buentello, Fabio, Deepa L. Persad, Erin B. Court, Douglas K. Martin, Abdallah S. Daar, and Peter A. Singer. 2005. Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Medicine 2(5): e97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schummer, Joachim. 2007. The impact of nanotechnologies on developing countries. In Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology, eds. F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. Moor and J. Weckert. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadlen, Kenneth C., Andrew Schrank, and Marcus J. Kurtz. 2005. The political economy of intellectual property rotection: The case of software. International Studies Quarterly 49(1): 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Sonali. 2006. Open beyond software. In Open Sources 2.0, eds. C. DiBona, D. Cooper and M. Stone. California: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singel, Ryan. 2008. DIY robotics: The rise of open source hardware. http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2008/03/etech_hardware. Accessed 16 Feb 2009.

  • Thompson, Clive. 2008. Build it. share it. profit. Can open source hardware work? Wired 16(11): 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2004. Free and open source software: Policy and development implications. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, Ryan R. 2000. Bazaar design of nano and micro manufacturing equipment. Paper presented at Nanotechnology Workshop, July 14, University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Reijswoud, Victor, and Arjan de Jager. 2008. Free and open source software for development. Monza Mi, Italy: Polimetrica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Kenneth. 2004. Free/open source software : Government policy. UNDP Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme—ePrimers on Free/Open Source Software.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like the thank Jameson Wetmore and an anonymous reviewer for their useful comments on the original version on this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanaraj Thakur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thakur, D. (2010). Open Access Nanotechnology for Developing Countries: Lessons from Open Source Software. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J. (eds) Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development. Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics