Skip to main content

Rise and Phall: Lessons from the Phorm Saga

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computers, Privacy and Data Protection: an Element of Choice

Abstract

The saga of Phorm’s Webwise behavioural targeting system, has been fraught with problems: legal challenges, technical disputes, serial campaigning, police action, EU action, smear campaigns and propaganda. Until the spring of 2009 it had looked as though Phorm would succeed, with the UK government firmly behind it, three of the biggest ISP’s planning to use its service, an endorsement of sorts from noted privacy advocates and guarded approval from the Information Commissioner’s Office. Then, however, things began to fall apart, and by the autumn of 2009 Phorm’s business model was in tatters. Why did this happen, and what lessons need to be learned? This chapter looks at the Phorm saga through the lens of Symbiotic Regulation, and suggests that Phorm’s apparent failure has been a result of their failure to understand the complexity of the regulatory matrix. In particular, Phorm underestimated the views of user-groups and digital rights advocates – and the influence and effect those views could have. The saga has many losers – as well as Phorm itself, the UK government and the ISPs all come out the worse for wear. This chapter suggests how much of this could have been avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As set out in A.D. Murray, The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment. (Milton Park, Abingdon, UK, 2006), Chapter 8

  2. 2.

    The theory behind this symbiosis is set out in P. Bernal. Web 2.5: The Symbiotic Web. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24 (2010): 25–37

  3. 3.

    http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle%26;art?aid=110489.

  4. 4.

    E.g http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559082

  5. 5.

    J. Turow et al. Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It. (Annenberg: University of Pennsylvania, 2009), particularly p. 3

  6. 6.

    R. Clayton, The Phorm “Webwise” System (2008). http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/080518-phorm.pdf:

  7. 7.

    Ibid. p2

  8. 8.

    N. Bohm, The Phorm “Webwise” System – a Legal Analysis.” Foundation for Information Policy Research, 2008

  9. 9.

    Ibid. pp. 3–11

  10. 10.

    Ibid. pp. 11–12

  11. 11.

    Ibid. p. 16

  12. 12.

    http://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/stop-phorm

  13. 13.

    Quoted in the Evening Standard, 6th March 2008, at http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-home/article-23449601-web-users-angry-at-isps-spyware-tie-up.do;jsessionid=D5AA1541C91446314EAD7013363AB159

  14. 14.

    See “Web creator rejects net tracking” at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7299875.stm

  15. 15.

    See for example http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/22/bt_phorm_police_drop/

  16. 16.

    Also see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/22/bt_phorm_police_drop/

  17. 17.

    See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/17/bt_phorm_lies/

  18. 18.

    See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/25/bt_cps/

  19. 19.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/ipm/2008/03/phorm_an_interview_with_kent_e.shtml

  20. 20.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2008/mar/06/yourquestionspleaseforkent

  21. 21.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/07/phorm_interview_burgess_Ertugrul/

  22. 22.

    http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/pressreleases/2008/new_phorm_statement_040408.pdf

  23. 23.

    See for example http://cryptome.org/ho-phorm.htm.

  24. 24.

    See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8021661.stm

  25. 25.

    http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/570%26;format=HTML%26;aged=0%26;language=EN%26;guiLanguage=en

  26. 26.

    BERR’s reply to Commissioner Reding was not made public, but BERR did disclose to The Register the key points, which were then published on the Internet at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/16/phorm_eu_berr/

  27. 27.

    http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/570%26;format=HTML%26;aged=0%26;language=EN%26;guiLanguage=en

  28. 28.

    See for example http://www.isba.org.uk/isba/news/657

  29. 29.

    In a live webchat on Phorm’s own blog. See http://www.webwise.com/how-it-works/transcript_080311.html

  30. 30.

    http://www.badphorm.co.uk

  31. 31.

    http://https://www.dephormation.org.uk/index.php

  32. 32.

    See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/08/phorm_censors_wikipedia/

  33. 33.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/04/phorm_hoping_to_stop_phoul_pla.html

  34. 34.

    See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7999635.stm

  35. 35.

    See http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/marketforceslive/2009/jul/21/phorm

  36. 36.

    See http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/20/internet-targeted-advertising-oft-investigation

  37. 37.

    See http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/20/advertising-digital-media

  38. 38.

    All Party Parliamentary Communications Group (apComms), “Can we keep our hands off the net?” Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Parliamentary Communications Group, October 2009. http://www.apcomms.org.uk/uploads/apComms_Final_Report.pdf

  39. 39.

    Ibid. p21

  40. 40.

    See http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/6209787/Phorm-loses-technology-chief.html

  41. 41.

    http://www.uspirg.org/uploads/Lh/2Y/Lh2Y_vpDJ2A5maDU214SFw/WaxmanBartonLetterSEPT091.pdf

  42. 42.

    See http://jetl.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/privacy-on-the-web-congress-set-to-curb-online-behavioral-advertising/

  43. 43.

    Reported in http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/31/kuneva_behavioural/

  44. 44.

    Reported in http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/09/15/brussels_behavioural_targeting/

  45. 45.

    http://www.out-law.com/page-10510

  46. 46.

    The directive, labeled PE-CONS 3674/09, modifies Directives 2002/22/EC and 2002/58/EC (the ePrivacy Directive) and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004. It is available at http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st03/st03674.en09.pdf

  47. 47.

    The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) Europe and publishers’ trade body the European Publishers’ Council (EPC), quoted in http://www.out-law.com/page-10550

  48. 48.

    As set out in A.D. Murray, The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment. (Milton Park, Abingdon, UK, 2006), Chapter 8

  49. 49.

    The business that became Phorm began as 121 Media, an ‘adware’ company whose products were labeled by many, including F-Secure, as spyware.

  50. 50.

    See J. Turow et al. Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It. (Annenberg: University of Pennsylvania, 2009)

  51. 51.

    For a summary of how Beacon worked from Facebook’s perspective, see the launch press release at: http://www.facebook.com/press/releases.php?p=9166

  52. 52.

    Facebook abandoned Beacon on 21st September 2009. See http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/files/facebook_beacon_complaint0812081.pdf

  53. 53.

    Action has been taken against Google StreetView in some countries – Switzerland is one example, see http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/swiss-take-legal-action-over-google-street-view-650241, while in Japan there are concerns about the misuse of images – see http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-street-view-in-japan-faces-various-complaints/13048/ – but Google StreetView appears to have been accepted in most countries.

  54. 54.

    StreetView has had more problems since – in May 2010, for example, it was the center of a controversy surrounding the way that StreetView cars had been “harvesting data” from people’s wifi networks (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10122339.stm) – but those problems have largely been unconnected with the basic principle of the service, and show little sign of halting the success of the service.

References

  • All Party Parliamentary Communications Group (apComms), “Can We Keep Our Hands off the Net?” Report of an Inquiry by the All Party Parliamentary Communications Group, October 2009. Available at: http://www.apcomms.org.uk/uploads/apComms_Final_Report.pdf

  • Bernal, P.A. “Web 2.5: The Symbiotic Web.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24 (2010), 25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, N. “The Phorm “Webwise” System – a Legal Analysis.” Foundation for Information Policy Research, (2008). http://www.fipr.org/080423phormlegal.pdf

  • Clayton, R, “The Phorm “Webwise” System” (2008). http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/080518-phorm.pdf:

  • Murray, A. D. The Regulation of Cyberspace: Control in the Online Environment, Milton Park, Abingdon, UK, 2006; New York, NY, Routledge-Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turow, J., King, J., Hoofnagle, C. J., Bleakley, A. & Hennessy, M. “Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It.” Annenberg: University of Pennsylvania, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1478214

  • Note: All web references throughout the article accessed 18th May 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on research for my doctorate funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Bernal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernal, P. (2011). Rise and Phall: Lessons from the Phorm Saga. In: Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., De Hert, P., Leenes, R. (eds) Computers, Privacy and Data Protection: an Element of Choice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0641-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics