Skip to main content

Akoma-Ntoso for Legal Documents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legislative XML for the Semantic Web

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((LGTS,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter aims to collocate Akoma Ntoso into the historical scenario of the legal XML schemas and to define the pillars of the Akoma Ntoso architecture. Second goal is to present the basic elements of Akoma Ntoso XML standard and how it can be used for marking up a legal document respecting a clear subdivision between the semantic layer of the knowledge embedded into the document.

This chapter was carried out with the following authors’ contributions: M. Palmirani paragraphs 6.1, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.5.5, 6.5.6, 6.5.7, 6.5.8, 6.5, 6.9, 6.6; F. Vitali paragraphs 6.2.4, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.5.3, 6.5.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Akoma Ntoso” in the language of the Akan people of West Africa is the symbol that represents understanding and agreement, “linked hearts”.

  2. 2.

    Uniform Resource Indentifier. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986

  3. 3.

    Bota, C., T. Dorsey, M. Palmirani, and G. Sartor. 2007. Legislative Drafting Guidelines for Africa, UNDESA Report. http://ldg.apkn.org/

  4. 4.

    http://projeto.lexml.gov.br/

  5. 5.

    World e-Parliament Report 2010, page 100, chapter 5.

  6. 6.

    LikeEnAct or FORMEX .

  7. 7.

    As NormeInRete or Lexdania [9].

References

  1. Barabucci, G., L. Cervone, A. Di Iorio, M. Palmirani, S. Peroni, and F. Vitali. 2010. Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain. Presented at Balisage: The Markup Conference 2010, Montréal, Canada, August 3–6, vol. 5. In Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference 2010. Balisage Series on Markup Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bekiari, C., M. Doerr, and P. Le Boeuf. 2008. International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (v. 0.9 draft). http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo /frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.9.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2009.

  3. Boer, A., R. Winkels, and Vitali, F. 2008. MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format. In Proceedings of Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies, 21–41. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breuker, J., A. Boer, R. Hoekstra, and C. Van Den Berg. 2006. Developing content for LKIF: Ontologies and framework for legal reasoning. In Legal knowledge and information systems, JURIX 2006, 41–50. Amsterdam: ISO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breuker, J., P. Casanovas, M.C.A. Klein, and E. Francesconi. 2009. Law, ontologies and the semantic web—channelling the legal information flood. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon, Thomas, F. 2008. Constructing legal arguments with rules in the legal knowledge interchange format (LKIF). In Computable models of the law, languages, dialogues, games, ontologies, 162–184. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jelliffe R. The Schematron Assertion Language 1.5. http://www.ascc.net/xml/resource/schematron/Schematron2000. Accessed 20 June 2009.

  8. Klarlund, N., A. Moller, and M.I. Schwartzbach. 2000. DSD: A Schema Language for XML. In Proceedings of the third workshop on Formal methods in software practice, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lupo, C., F. Vitali, E. Francesconi, M. Palmirani, R. Winkels, E. de Maat, A. Boer, and P. Mascellani. 2007. General xml format(s) for legal sources—Estrella European Project IST-2004-027655. Deliverable 3.1, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murata, M. 2009. RELAX (REgular LAnguage description for XML). http://www.xml.gr.jp/relax, 2000. Accessed 20 June 2009.

  11. Palmirani, M., G. Contissa, and R. Rubino. 2009. Fill the gap in the legal knowledge modelling. RuleML2009 proceeding, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sartor, G. 2005. Legal reasoning: A cognitive approach to the law. Vol. 5. Treatise on Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vitali, F. 2009. Akoma Ntoso release notes. http://www.akomantoso.org. Accessed 20 August 2009.

  14. Vitali, F., and F. Zeni. 2007. Towards a country-independent data format: The Akoma-Ntoso experience. In Proceedings of the V legislative XML workshop, 67–86. Florence, Italy: European Press Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Palmirani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palmirani, M., Vitali, F. (2011). Akoma-Ntoso for Legal Documents. In: Sartor, G., Palmirani, M., Francesconi, E., Biasiotti, M. (eds) Legislative XML for the Semantic Web. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1887-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics