Skip to main content

Triangle of Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability

Abstract

A consistent and comprehensive general concept of justice is developed in this chapter. It can be useful for solving conflicts of claims and interests which are crucial for climate and development policy. Our theory of justice is based on the core of human rights understood as everyone’s equal right to have the inviolable freedom to live a flourishing life. This core is systematically developed into three dimensions of justice: basic needs fulfilment, sufficient opportunities (operationalised as equal and effective access to processes, education and some economic goods) and fair procedures. In principle, none of these three dimensions of justice predominate, because all of them are inherent aspects, irreducible to one another, of the ethical viewpoint chosen here. If justice is to be achieved, the demands of all three dimensions have to be fulfilled at the same time. Furthermore, it is shown how these three dimensions are interrelated in terms of moral rights as well as duties, and how they can be applied to intra-generational and inter-generational issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baer, P., & Athanasiou, T. (2007). Frameworks & proposals: A brief, adequacy and equity-based evaluation of some prominent climate policy frameworks and proposals (Global Issue Papers No. 30). Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. (2010). Climate responsibility as a distributional issue. Analyse und Kritik, 32, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (1994). Discounting the future. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, 128–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2006). Environmental degradation, reparations, and the moral significance of history. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(3), 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2009a). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2009b). Climate change and the future: Discounting for time, wealth, and risk. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (1865). Alice’s adventures in wonderland. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2008). Discounting climate change. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 37, 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1988). Theory of valuation. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, volume 13: 1938–1939 (pp. 189–251). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (Ed.). (1999). Fairness and futurity. Essays on environmental sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. M. (2010). Ethics and climate change: An introduction. WIREs ClimChange, 1, 54–66. doi:10.1002/wcc.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., & Shue, H. (Eds.). (2010). Climate ethics: Essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosseries, A. (2004). Historical emissions and free-riding. Ethical Perspectives, 11(1), 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. G. (2009). World ethics and climate change: From international to global justice (Edinburgh Studies in World Ethics). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I., Stern, M., & Grundberg, I. (Eds.). (1999). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rovere, E. L., de Macedo, L. V., & Baumert, K. A. (2002). The Brazilian proposal on relative responsibility for global warming. In K. A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, & J. Perkaus (Eds.), Building on the Kyoto protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 157–173). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute (chapter 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, J., & Favor, C. (2007). Distributive justice. In. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2007 ed.). From http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/

  • Lomborg, B. (Ed.). (2009). Global crises, global solutions: Costs and benefits (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H. (2004). Compensating wrongless historical emissions of greenhouse gases. Ethical Perspectives, 11(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H., & Roser, D. (2010). Climate justice and historical emissions. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2008). Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. From http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/Miller_08.pdf

  • Ott, K. (2003). Reflections on discounting: Some philosophical remarks. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, K., & Döring, R. (2008). Strong sustainability and environmental policy: Justification and implementation. In C. L. Soskolne (Ed.), Sustaining life on earth – Environmental and human health through global governance (pp. 109–123). Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. A. (2007). Climate change, justice and future generations. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E., & Weisbach, D. (2010). Climate change justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays (New ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1992). The unavoidability of justice. In A. Hurrell & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The international politics of the environment: Actors, interests and institutions (pp. 373–397). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law and Policy, 15(1), 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UDHR. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. From http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. Accessed on 4 May 2012.

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2007). Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world (Human Development Report 2007/2008). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. From http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

  • Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (2001). Gamma discounting. The American Economic Review, 91(1), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kowarsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kowarsch, M., Gösele, A. (2012). Triangle of Justice. In: Edenhofer, O., Wallacher, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Reder, M., Knopf, B., Müller, J. (eds) Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics