Abstract
Universities around the world have been called to (re)consider their role in society, to evaluate their mission, their relationship with various internal and external stakeholders, as well as their contribution to democratic and sustainable society. Universities are increasingly expected to be more socially accountable, to collaborate more and therefore contribute more to different public and private domains of the society. In other words, universities are impelled to assume their ‘third mission’ and to engage in various forms of interactions with local, regional, national and international business and social partners. The university pillars of teaching and research are therefore undergoing significant pressure and change. Academics are not only expected to achieve excellence in their teaching and research, but to achieve it in a way that is measurable, efficient, effective and highly relevant for the contemporary knowledge-economy and society at large. At the same time, universities have been criticized for tailoring their curricula and research as well as extending their activities by the market’s needs, thus leaving behind the civic responsibility. Authors place the issue of extending teaching and research within the wider discussion on the ‘third mission’ that thoroughly explores how universities interact with the public domain. The issues of university civic mission, education for socially responsible and active citizens, as well as the education for sustainable development, are discussed as potential answers to the pressures universities and academics are faced with on their way to become more accountable for complexity and needs of the society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Besides the latest and, as Lindberg (2010) pointed out, extremely relevant for universities all over the world—The Bonn Declaration (2009) adopted at the UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development, then the most influential, the UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education in 1998 and The UNESCO World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-first Century: Vision and Action, some of the most relevant documents related to the contemporary role of universities and academics are: The UN Millennium Declaration and the United Nations Millennium Developmental Goals; Kyoto protocol; Education for All; Food for All; the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005–2014; High-level Group Report on the Alliance of Civilizations, etc. Additional selection of international declarations also emphasising the role of universities and higher education in society (in the field of environmental protection, sustainable development and cultural understanding) offer the following relevant documents: The Stockholm Declaration, Sweden (1972); The Talloires Declaration, France (1990); The Halifax Declaration, Canada (1991); The Rio Declaration, Brazil (1992); Agenda 21 (1992); The Swansea Declaration, Wales (1993); the Copernicus Charter (1993); The Barbados Declaration (1994); Learning: The Treasure Within, UNESCO (1996); The Thessaloniki Declaration (1997); The Earth Charter (2000); The Luneburg Declaration, Germany (2001); Alliance of Civilization (2005); and Communiqué of the 34th session on the UNESCO General Conference (2007).
- 2.
According to a comparative research conducted in eight EU member states “EUYOUPART—Political Participation of Young People in Europe: Development of indicators for Comparative Research in the European Union” 63 % of youth does not show any interest for the public sphere. The research was conducted in Italy, Austria, Germany, France, Great Britain, Slovakia, Finland and Estonia between 2003 and 2005 on the population of youth from 15 to 25 years of age. The Austrian Institute for Social Research and Analysis conducted the research. More information available at: http://www.sora.at/de/start.asp?b=14.
- 3.
The international comparative analysis on the academic profession reveals that the time spent on service activities by university professors varied according to country from 6 to 12 % (Teichler 1996).
- 4.
Parker and Jary (1995) warn about how the current changes have transformed universities in McUniversity—widely available and standardized service.
- 5.
Jongbloed et al. (2008) reminded on the OECD-CHERI edition The University and the Community: The Problems of Changing Relationships from 1982, where universities were called upon to assume a public service function, i.e. make a contribution to solve major problems the local community and society at large were faced with, and participate directly in the process of social change. They continue by stressing the relevance of this 27 years old call in today’s discussions on the role of the university.
- 6.
Jongbloed et al. (2008) point out the university mission overload stating how contemporary universities suffer from an acute case of mission confusion.
- 7.
The integration of sustainability within higher education implies a shift from transmissive learning to learning through discovery; from teacher-centered approach to learner-centered approach; from individual learning to collaborative learning; from learning dominated by theory to praxis-oriented learning which links theory and experience; from a focus on accumulating knowledge and a content orientation to a focus on self-regulative learning and real issue orientations; the emphasis on cognitive objectives only to cognitive, affective and skill-related objective; from institutional staff-based teaching/learning to learning with and from outsiders; from low-level cognitive learning to higher-level cognitive learning (Van de Bor et al. 2000, in Sterling 2004).
- 8.
For detailed and interesting observations on the issue, read Graham, G. (2002). Universities: the recovery of an idea. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic.
- 9.
According to Laredo (2007), a pilot study conducted by OECD at the end of the 1990s demonstrated that nearly all OECD countries have developed specific policies to nurture the creation of firms and promote their development: science or technology parks, incubators, incentives for academic staff to engage in commercial activities, etc.
- 10.
Faced with financing challenges, mostly because of the lack of state investments, universities are forced to find models of sustainability, making the tuition costs and public-private partnerships to rise (OECD 2004). Buchbinder (1993) warns about the financial reality and the surroundings in which universities operate, and shows a trend of survival by adjusting to the political economy characterized by global competition, contract business and efficiency.
- 11.
For further details see: Göransson et al. 2009.
- 12.
For further details see: Göransson et al. 2009.
- 13.
A recommendation was given to expand the concept of “environment” (“environmental protection”) to the concept of “sustainable development”.
- 14.
The key lessons that have been learned about education for sustainable development: “Education for sustainable development is an emerging but dynamic concept that encompasses a new vision of education that seeks to empower people of all ages to assume responsibility for creating a sustainable future. Basic education provides the foundation for all future education and is a contribution to sustainable development in its own right. There is a need to refocus many existing education policies, programmes and practices so that they build the concepts, skills, motivation and commitment needed for sustainable development. Education is the key to rural transformation and is essential to ensuring the economic, cultural and ecological vitality of rural areas and communities. Lifelong learning, including adult and community education, appropriate technical and vocational education, higher education and teacher education are all vital ingredients of capacity building for a sustainable future” (UNESCO 2002, pp. 5–6).
- 15.
From UNECE Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development: “Education, in addition to being a human right, is a prerequisite for achieving sustainable development and an essential tool for good governance, informed decision-making and the promotion of democracy. Therefore, education for sustainable development can help translate our vision into reality. Education for sustainable development develops and strengthens the capacity of individuals, groups, communities, organizations and countries to make judgments and choices in favor of sustainable development. It can promote a shift in people’s mindsets and in so doing enable them to make our world safer, healthier and more prosperous, thereby improving the quality of life. Education for sustainable development can provide critical reflection and greater awareness and empowerment so that new visions and concepts can be explored and new methods and tools developed” (UNECE Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development 2005, p. 1).
- 16.
The published HES literature has focused on sustainability education; curriculum development; physical operations; HES policy analysis; assessment methodologies for HES initiatives; the development of theory; developing key competencies and learning outcomes (see Wright 2007 who provides extensive literature on these topics).
- 17.
Svanstrom et al. (2008) discussed the commonalities that can be found in learning outcomes for education for sustainable development in the context of the Tbilisi and Barcelona declarations. The commonalities include systemic or holistic thinking, the integration of different perspectives, skills such as critical thinking, change agent abilities and communication, and finally different attitudes and values.
- 18.
The Copernicus Declaration contains an action plan, which sums up the role of universities in ten principles: (1) institutional commitment; (2) environmental ethics; (3) education of university employees; (4) programmes in environmental education; (5) interdisciplinarity; (6) dissemination of knowledge; (7) networking; (8) partnerships; (9) continuing education programmes; (10) technology transfer.
- 19.
Very interesting analysis on the implementation of the Copernicus declaration in Aalborg University was written by Christensen et al. (2009), which stated that when seen from a present perspective, it seems that this policy was never really implemented. The reason for this is probably twofold: (1) the university never made sure that the proper policies and management system were in place to secure the involvement of all interested parties and communication only took place internally in the committee. (2) Environmentalism has been on the decline in Danish society for some years adding to the fact that it has been difficult to keep up the spirits in such activities (p. 16).
- 20.
This Declaration calls for the universities to allocate a fundamental status to sustainable development within their strategies and activities, promoting creative development and implementing comprehensive and integrated sustainable actions in relation to learning and teaching, research, and both internal and external societal responsibility. Furthermore, universities should cooperate with other higher education institutions and communities (Glavič and Lukman 2007, p. 104).
References
Abramson, H. N., Encarnação, J., Reid, P. P., & Schmoch, U. (1997). Technology transfer systems in the United States and Germany – lessons and perspectives. Washington, D.C.: National academy press.
Adomssent, M., Godemann, J., & Michelsen, G. (2008). Sustainable university—empirical evidence and strategic recommendations for holistic transformation approaches to sustainability in higher education institutions. Proceedings of the 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education (Vol. 7). Higher education for sustainable development. Barcelona: GUNI. http://www.guni-rmies.net.
Altbach, P. (2008). The complex roles of universities in the period of globalization. In Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI), Higher Education in the World 3. Higher education: new challenges and emerging roles for human and social development (pp. 5–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU). (2001). Engagement as a core value for the university: a consultation document. London: ACU.
Bender, T. (1997). Intellect and public life: essays on the social history of academic intellectuals in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bess, J. L. (1998). Teaching well: do you have to be schizophrenic? The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 1–15.
Bloomgarden, A. H., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007). Faculty role integration and community engagement: harmony or cacophony? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 13(2), 5–18.
Bortagaray, I. (2009). Bridging university and society in Uruguay: perceptions and expectations. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 115–119.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsider: priorities of the professoriate. Stanford: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Braxton, J., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (Eds.). (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(2)). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brennan, J. (2006). The changing academic profession: the driving forces.Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance, and governance in the changing academia: international perspectives (pp. 37–44). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.
Brennan, J., King, R., & Lebeau, Y. (2004). The role of universities in the transformation of societies. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities and Centre for Higher Education Research and Information.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2000). Institutionalization of service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 273–290.
Buchbinder, H. (1993). The market oriented university and the changing role of knowledge. Higher Education, 26(3), 331–347.
Calhoun, C. (2006). The university and the public good. Thesis Eleven, 84(1), 7–43.
Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. B. (2003). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. In R. Rutten, F. Boekama, & E. Kuijpers (Eds.), Economic geography of higher education: knowledge, infrastructure and learning regions (pp. 19–41). London: Routledge.
Checkoway, B. (2000). Public service: our new mission. Academe, 86(4), 24–28.
Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American Research University. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(2), 125–147.
Christensen, P., Thrane, M., Herreborg Jørgensen, T., & Lehmann, M. (2009). Sustainable development. Assessing the gap between preaching and practice at Aalborg University. The International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(1), 4–20.
Cifrić, I. (1997). Napredak i Opstanak. Zagreb: Hrvatsko Sociološko Društvo—Zavod za Sociologiju Filozofskog Fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Cifrić, I. (2005). Ekološka edukacija. Filozofska istraživanja, 25(2), 327–344.
Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York: Elsevier Science Regional Sales.
Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: continuities in case studies and concepts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Colbeck, C. L. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: how faculty integrate teaching and research. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 647–671.
Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Integration: evaluating faculty work as a whole. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114, 43–52.
Cummings, W. K. (2006). The third revolution of higher education: becoming more relevant. Reports of changing academic profession project workshop on quality, relevance, and governance in the changing academia: international perspectives (pp. 209–222). Hiroshima: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.
Harpe, B. de la, & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum change in universities: conditions that facilitate education for sustainable development. The Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 75–85. http://jsd.sagepub.com. Accessed 13 Oct 2009.
Edwards, B., & Marullo, S. (1999). Editors’ introduction: universities in troubled times—institutional responses. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(5), 754–765.
Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.
Escrigas, C. (2008). Foreword. Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI), Higher education in the World 3. Higher education: new challenges and emerging roles for human and social development (pp. xxviii–xxxi). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Escrigas, C., & Lobera, J. (2009). Introduction: new dynamics for social responsibility. Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI), Higher education at a time of transformation—new dynamics for social responsibility (pp. 1–19). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 20(2), 18–29.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple-helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., & Healey, P. (1998). Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia. New York: State University of New York Press.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
European Commission (EC). (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Communication from the Commission, Brussels, 05 Feb 2003, COM, 58 final.
European Commission (EC). (2007). Promoting young people’s full participation in education, employment and society. Communication from the Commission, Brussels, 5 Sept 2007, COM, 498 final.
Faulks, K. (2000). Citizenship. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ferrer-Balas, D., Adachi, J., Banas, S., Davidson, C. I., Hoshikoshi, A., Mishra, A., Motodoa, Y., Onga, M., & Ostwald, M. (2008). An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. The International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 295–316.
Fiskovica Adamsone, A., Kristapsons, J., Tjunina, E., & Ulnicane-Ozolina, I. (2009). Moving beyond teaching and research: economic and social tasks of universities in Latvia. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 133–137.
Furco, A. (2001). Advancing service learning at research universities. New Directions for Higher Education, 114, 67–78.
Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Geiser, K. (2006). Education for a transition to sustainability. In R. Forrant & L. Silka (Eds.), Inside and out: universities and education for sustainable development (pp. 29–40). New York: Baywood.
Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761), C81–C84.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartmann, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007.) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(18), 1875–1885. http://www.sciencedirect.com/. Accessed 15 Oct 2009.
Gokhberg, L., Kuznetsova, T., & Zaichenko, S. (2009). Towards a new role of universities in Russia: prospects and limitations. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 121–126.
Golde, C. M., & Pribbenow, D. A. (2000). Understanding faculty involvement in residential learning communities. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 27–40.
Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009). New activities of universities in transfer and extension: multiple requirements and manifold solutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 157–164.
Gough, S., & Scott, W. (2007). Higher education and sustainable development: paradox and possibility. London: Routledge.
Graham, G. (2002). Universities: the recovery of an idea. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic.
Greenbank, P. (2006). The academic’s role: the need for a re-evaluation? Teaching in Higher Education, 11(1), 107–112.
Gregersen, B., Tved Linde, L., & Gulddahal Rasmussen, J. (2009). Linking between Danish Universities and Society. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 151–156.
Griffith, R. (1998). Educational citizenship and independent learning. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Harkavy, I. (2006). The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5–37.
Heater, D. (1999). What is citizenship? Cambridge: Polity.
Higher Education Academy. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: current practice and future development. New York: Higher Education Academy.
Holland, B. A. (1999). Factors and strategies that influence faculty involvement in public service. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 4(1), 37–43.
Hollander, E. L., & Saltmarsh, J. (2000). The engaged university. Academe, 86(4), 29–32.
IPCC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2008.
Jacoby, B. (2009). Civic engagement in higher education: concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.
Karlsson, J. (2007). Service as collaboration—an integrated process in teaching and research: a response to Greenbank. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(2), 281–287.
Karlsson, J., Booth, S., & Odenrick, P. (2007). Academics’ strategies and obstacles in achieving collaboration between universities and SMEs. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(3), 187–201.
Kehm, B. M., & Pasternack, P. (2000). Hochschulentwicklung als Komplexitätsproblem. Fallstudien des Wandels. Weinheim: Beltz.
Koester, R. J., Eflin, J., & Vann, J. (2006). Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9/11), 769–779.
Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.
Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2009). Linkages to the society as “Leisure Time Activities”? Experiences at German universities. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 139–144.
Kuckartz, U. (1997). Ekologizacija Visokog Školstva. Socijalna ekologija, 6(1–2), 1–22.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.
Ledić, J. (2007). U Potrazi za Civilnom Misijom Hrvatskih Sveučilišta. In V. Previšić, N. N. Šoljan, & N. Hrvatić (Eds.), Pedagogija—Prema Cjeloživotnom Obrazovanju i Društvu Znanja (pp. 123–134). Zagreb: Hrvatsko Pedagogijsko Društvo.
Lindberg, C. (2010). Universities are key agents for promoting sustainable development. GUNI Newsletter. http://web.guni2005.upc.es/interviews/detail.php?chlang=en&id=1522. Accessed 24 Feb 2010.
Locke, W., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). The changing conditions for academic work and careers in select countries (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 66). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER-Kassel).
Lombardi, J. (2001). Quality engines: the strategic principles for competitive universities in the twenty-first century. The Center Reports. http://jvlone.com/UCV_ENG_1a.pdf. Accessed 03 Feb 2009.
Lozano, R. (2006). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 787–796. http://www.sciencedirect.com/. Accessed 02 Nov 2009.
Lozano-Garcıa, F. J., Gandara, G., Perrni, O., Manzano, M., Hern, D. E., & Huisingh, D. (2008). Capacity building: a course on sustainable development to educate the educators. The International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 257–281. http://www.esmeraldinsight.com/1467-6370. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
Lucas, C. J. (1994). American higher education. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Lynton, E. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Mac Labhrainn, I. (2005). Reinvigorating the civic mission of the university. Galway: Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, National University of Ireland.
Macfarlane, B. (2005). Placing service in academic life. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: new relations between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 165–177). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Maculan, A. M., & Carvalho de Mello, J. M. (2009). University start-ups breaking lock-ins of the Brazilian economy. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 109–114.
Maloney, W. A., & Deth, J. van. (Eds.). (2008). Civil society and governance in Europe: from national to international linkages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marullo, S., Cooke, D., Willis, J., Rollins, A., Burke, J., Bonilla, P., & Waldref, V. (2003). Community-based research assessments: some principles and practices. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (Spring), 9(3) 57–68.
McLaughlin, M. (1995). Employability skills profile: what are employers looking for? Report 81-92-E. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada. http://www.ericdigests.org/1997-2/sills.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2008.
McMillin, J., & Dyball, R. (2009). Developing a whole-of-university approach to educating for sustainability: linking curriculum, research and sustainable campus operations. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 55–64. http://jsd.sagepub.com. Accessed 13 Oct 2009.
Menges, R. J. (Eds.). (1999). Faculty in new jobs: a guide to settling in, becoming established, and building institutional support. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.
Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final Report to the Russell Group of Universities, SPRU, University of Sussex.
Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 259–271.
Morshidi S., Zain, A. N. M., & Yunus, A. S. M., et al. (2007). Malaysia: New and diversified roles and responsibilities for academics. In W. Locke & U. Teichler (ed.), The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (pp. 147–162). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel, University of Kassel.
Mwamila, B. L. M., & Diyamett, B. D. (2009). Universities and socio-economic development in Tanzania: public perceptions and realities on the ground. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 85–90.
National Commission on Civic Renewal. (1998). A nation of spectators: how civic disengagement weakens America and what we can do about it—final report. http://www.puaf.umd.edu/Affiliates/CivicRenewal. Accessed 14 Jan 2009.
Nayyar, D. (2008). Globalization: what does it mean for higher education? In L. E. Weber & J. D. Duderstadt (Eds.), The globalization of higher education (pp. 3–14). Paris: Economica.
Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: a framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23(2), 159–171.
Neumann, R. (1996). Researching the teaching-research nexus: a critical review. Australian Journal of Education, 40(1), 5–18.
Ngoc Ca, T. (2009). Reaching out to society: Vietnamese universities in transition. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 91–95.
OECD. (2004). Public-private partnerships for research and innovation: an evaluation of the Dutch experience. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/49/18/25717044.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2009.
OECD. (2007). Higher education and regions: globally competitive, locally engaged. Paris: OECD.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 26(1), 57–80.
O’Meara, K., Kaufman, R. R., & Kuntz, A. M. (2003). Faculty work in challenging times: trends, consequences and implications. Liberal Education, 89(4), 16–23. http://www.aacu.org/liberaleducation/le-fa03/le-fa03feature2.cfm. Accessed 03 Feb 2009.
Ordorika, I. (2009). Commitment to society: contemporary challenges for public research universities. Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI), Higher education at a time of transformation—new dynamics for social responsibility (pp. 72–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ostrander, S. (2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: a comparative study of civic engagement on five universities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 74–93.
Palsson, C. M., Göransson, B., & Brundenius, C. (2009). Vitalizing the Swedish university system: implementation of the third mission. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 145–150.
Parker, M., & Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: organisations, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319–338.
Paulsen, M., & Feldman, K. (1995). Towards a reconceptualization of scholarship. A human action system with functional imperatives. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(6), 615–640.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Rice, E. R., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. (2000). Heeding new voices: academic careers for a new generation. New pathways: faculty careers and employment for the 21st century, inquiry #7. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Rosenthal, R., & Wittrock, B. (1993). The European and American universities since 1800: historical and sociological essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Šalaj, B. (2002). Modeli Političkoga Obrazovanja u Skolskim Šustavima. Unpublished master thesis, Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb.
Schoen, A. (Ed.). (2006). Strategic Management of University Research Activities, Methodological Guide—PRIME Project ‘Observatory of the European University.’ http://www.enid-europe.org/PRIME/documents/OEU_guide.pdf. Accessed 09 Nov 2009.
Schroeder, C. C. (1999). Partnerships: an imperative for enhancing student learning and institutional effectiveness. New Directions for Student Services, 87, 5–18.
Scott, J. C. (1992). The influence of the Medieval University on the Latin Church and Secular Government Politics. San Francisco: Mellen Research University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2006). The mission of the university: medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1–39.
Scott, W., & Gough, S. (2007). Universities and sustainable development: the necessity for barriers to change. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 11(4), 107–115. http://search.ebscohost.com/. Accessed 23 Jan 2010.
Sirat, M. (2007). Forging university-industry links: implications for knowledge transfer in developing countries. Updates on Global Higher Education, Institut Penyelidikan Pendidikan Tinggi Negra (iPPTN), No. 11, July 14, 2007.
Slahova, A., Savvina, J., Cacka, M., & Volonte, I. (2007). Creative activity in conception of sustainable development education. The International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(2), 142–154. http://www.esmeraldinsight.com/1467-6370. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Roman, M., Graham, A. C., & Scholz, R.W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. The International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317–338. http://www.ebscohost.com. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
Sterling, S. (2004). An analysis of the development of sustainability education internationally: evolution, interpretation and transformative potential. In J. Blewitt & C. Cullingford (Eds.), The sustainability curriculum—the challenge for higher education (pp. 43–62). UK: Earthscan.
Svanstrom, M., Lozano-Garcia, F. J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability is in Higher Education, 9(3), 339–351. http://www.sciencedirect.com/. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
Taylor, P. (2008). Higher education curriculum for human and social development: filling a pail, or lighting a fire? http://www.slideshare.net/guni_rmies/session-1-peter-taylor. Accessed 23 Jan 2009.
Teichler, U. (1996). The conditions of the academic profession—an international, comparative analysis of the academic profession in Western Europe, Japan and the USA. In P. A. M. Maassen & F. A. Vught van (Eds.), Inside academia—new challenges for the academic profession (pp. 15–65). Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
Thorn, K., & Soo, M. (2009). Latin American universities and the third mission: trends, challenges and policy options, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 4002.
UNECE. (2005). UNECE strategy for education for sustainable development. http://www.unece.org/env/documents/2005/cep/ac.13/cep.ac.13.2005.3.rev.1.e.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2006.
UNESCO. (2002). Education for sustainability from Rio to Johannesburg: lessons learnt from a decade of commitment. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001271/127100e.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
UNESCO. (2009). World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development: 31 March–2 April 2009, Bonn, Germany Proceedings. http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009ProceedingsEnglishFINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2010.
Vabø, A. (2007). Challenges of internalization for the academic profession in Norway. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 99–107). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.
Van den Bor, W., Holen, P., Wals, A., & Filho, W. (2000). Integrating concepts of sustainability into education for agriculture and rural development. Lang: Frankfurt.
Viederman, S. (2006). Can universities contribute to sustainable development? In R. Forrant & L. Silka (Eds.), Inside and out: universities and education for sustainable development (pp. 17–28). Amityville: Baywood.
Wang, H., & Zhou, Y. (2009). University-owned enterprises as entry point to the knowledge economy in China. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 103–108.
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(5)). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wilkins, C. (1999). Making “Good Citizens”: the social and political attitudes of PGCE students. Oxford Review of Education, 25(1/2), 217–230.
Wright, T. S. A. (2007). Developing research priorities with a cohort of higher education for sustainability experts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(1), 34–43. http://www.esmeraldinsight.com/1467-6370. Accessed 24 Oct 2009.
Wright, T., & Pullen, P. (2007). Examining the literature: a bibliometric study of ESD journal articles in the Education Resources Information Center Database. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 77–90. http://jsd.sagepub.com. Accessed 10 Nov 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ćulum, B., Rončević, N., Ledić, J. (2013). Facing New Expectations—Integrating Third Mission Activities into the University. In: Kehm, B., Teichler, U. (eds) The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4613-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4614-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)