Skip to main content

Communicating About Number: Fostering Young Children’s Mathematical Orientation in the World

  • Chapter
Reconceptualizing Early Mathematics Learning

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Future citizens need a basic proficiency in mathematics, usually referred to as mathematical literacy. This article argues that mathematical literacy can be fostered from an early age by helping children with exploring their actual play situations from the perspective of number, and with translating number related problems into thinking objects that are accessible for mathematical refinement (i.e. mathematising). Through observational studies of young children’s play it is found that this mathematising can meaningfully take place in the context of young children’s play, and is strongly related children’s learning to communicate about number in a coherent way, rather than by training them on number operations. The article presents evidence from case studies that support the claim that early mathematising in young children involves at least three dimensions: involving children in mathematising activities, helping them to invent symbolic means for referring to number aspects of reality (communicating with number), and guided examination of properties of number (communicating about number). Its is concluded that young children’s mathematical orientation in the world can be fostered in the context of children’s play under the guidance of a teacher who helps children with improving their way of communicating about number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All measurements were made with reliable and valid tests. Mathematical skill and Vocabulary were measured with instruments published by the Dutch national test institute (CITO). Narrative competence was measured by an instrument that was produced and validated in several studies in our own department.

  2. 2.

    Thanks to Niko Fijma who communicated this event to me on a video clip.

References

  • Bjuland, R., Cestari, M. L., & Borgersen, H. E. (2008). The interplay between gesture and discourse as mediating devices in collaborative mathematical reasoning: a multimodal approach. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruin-Muurling, G. (2010). The development of proficiency in the fraction domain. Affordances and constraints in the curriculum. Dissertation, Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. (1997). Mathematical understanding in the nursery school years. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 53–67). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. (2003). Children’s mathematical narratives as learning stories. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Narratives of childhood. Theoretical and practical explorations for the innovation of early childhood education (pp. 51–67). Amsterdam: VU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2006). In Children’s mathematics. Making marks, making meaning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning. Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 90–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961). The mechanization of the world picture: Pythagoras to Newton. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeblad, E. (1996). Göteborg studies in educational sciences: Vol. 105. Children, learning, and number. A phenographic excursion into first grade children’s arithmetic. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Georgiou, A. (2010). The role of pictures in picture books on children’s cognitive engagement with mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(3), 125–147. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2010.500054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fijma, N. (2012). Learning to communicate about number. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Developmental education for young children. Concept, practice, and implementation (pp. 253–270). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2005). Creating mathematics stories: learning to explain in a third grade classroom. In R. Nemirovsky, A. S. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: studies of complex classroom events (pp. 177–209). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal’perin, P. Ja. (1976). Vvedenie v psichologiju [introduction to psychology]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Universiteta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Houten, W. (2011). Narratieve competentie en rekenvaardigheid in groep 3 en 4 van de basisschool [Narrative competence and arithmetical ability]. Master thesis, Onderwijspedagogiek, Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogy. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1991). Children and number. Difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Desforges, C., Mitchel, C., & Carré, C. (2000). Numeracy and beyond. Applying mathematics in primary school. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolovou, A. (2011). Mathematical problem solving in primary school. Dissertation, Utrecht University: FIsme Scientific Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumheuer, G. (1997). Narrativität und Lernen. Mikrosoziologische Studien zur sozialen Konstitution schulischen Lernens. [Narrativity and learning. Microsociological studies of the social constitution of school learning]. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Pritchard, C. (2002). Symbolizing space into being. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing and modeling in mathematics education (pp. 59–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2008). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2002). Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mix, K. S., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2005). Number words and number concepts: the interplay of verbal and nonverbal quantification in early childhood. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behaviour (Vol. 22, pp. 305–346). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, P. (1998). Symbolic function in pre-schoolers. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 47–71). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemirovsky, R., & Monk, S. (2000). “If you look at it the other way…”: an exploration into the nature of symbolising. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design (pp. 177–221). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C. (1998). Language socialization in the mathematics classroom: discourse practices and mathematical thinking. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school (pp. 17–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012). Education at a glance 2012 (Report OECD). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Glossary: http://www.oecd.org/edu/EAG%20Glossary.pdf.

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1995). Symbols and meanings in schools and mathematics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poland, M., van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2009). Schematising activities in early childhood education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Human development, the growth of discourse, and mathematising. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school (pp. 107–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C., Thomas, M. O. J., & Dreyfus, T. (2011) Grounded blends and mathematical gesture spaces: developing mathematical understandings via gestures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78, 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1994). Semiotic activity of young children in play: the construction and use of schematic representations. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1996a). The dynamics of school learning. In J. Valsiner & H.-G. Voss (Eds.), The structure of learning processes (pp. 205–229). New York: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1996b). Are you sure? the promotion of mathematical thinking in the play activities of young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 4(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2001). Educational forms of initiation in mathematical culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2002). The mathematization of young children’s language. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing and modeling in mathematics education (pp. 29–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2006). An activity theory approach to the formation of mathematical cognition: developing topics through predication in a mathematical community. In J. Maaß& W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 113–139). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2008). Learning and learning theory from a cultural-historical point of view. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning. Advances in cultural-historical activity theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2010). The emergence of mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9225-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2012a). How to promote young children’s mathematical thinking? Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1–2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2012b). Developmental education for young children. Concept, practice, implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2012c). Meaningful cultural learning by imitative participation: the case of abstract thinking in primary school. Human Development, 55(3), 136–158. doi:10.1159/00033929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B., & Poland, M. (2007). Schematising activities as a means for young children to think abstractly. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(2), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotskij, L. S. (1983). Sobranie sočinenij, Tom 5. [Collected works, Vol. 5]. Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert van Oers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Oers, B. (2013). Communicating About Number: Fostering Young Children’s Mathematical Orientation in the World. In: English, L., Mulligan, J. (eds) Reconceptualizing Early Mathematics Learning. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6440-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics