nach oben

Erschienen in:

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Domino Effects and Industrial Risks: Integrated Probabilistic Framework – Case of Tsunamis Effects

verfasst von : Ahmed Mebarki, Sandra Jerez, Igor Matasic, Gaëtan Prodhomme, Mathieu Reimeringer, Vincent Pensee, Quang Anh Vu, Adrien Willot

Erschienen in: Tsunami Events and Lessons Learned

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated probabilistic framework that deals with the industrial accidents and domino effects that may occur in an industrial plant. The particular case of tsunamis is detailed in the present paper: simplified models for the inundations depths and run-ups as well as their mechanical effects on industrial tanks.

The initial accident may be caused by severe service conditions in any of the tanks either under or at atmospheric pressure, or triggered by a natural hazard such as earthquake, tsunami or extreme floods for instance. This initial event generates, in general, a set of structural fragments, a fire ball, a blast wave as well as critical losses of containment (liquid and gas release and loss). The surrounding facilities may suffer serious damages and may also be a new source of accident and explosion generating afterwards a new sequence of structural fragments, fire ball, blast wave and confinement loss. The structural fragments, the blast wave form and the features of the fire ball can be described following database and feedback collected from past accidents.

The surrounding tanks might be under or at atmospheric pressure, and might be buried or not, or protected by physical barriers such as walls. The vulnerability of the potential targets should therefore be investigated in order to assess the risk of propagation of the accidents since cascading sequences of accidents, explosions and fires may take place within the industrial plant, giving rise to the domino effect that threatens any industrial plant.

The present research describes the risk of domino effect occurrence. The methodology is developed so that it can be operational and valid for any industrial site. It is supposed to be valid for a set of sizes, forms and kinds of tanks as well as a given geometric disposal on the industrial site. The interaction and the behavior of the targets affected or impacted by the first explosion effects should be described thanks to adequate simplified or sophisticated mechanical models: perforation and penetration of metal fragments when they impact surrounding tanks, as well as global failure such as overturning, buckling, excessive bending or shear effects, etc. The vulnerability analysis is detailed for the case of tanks under the mechanical effects generated by tsunamis.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Concatenated Hazards: Tsunamis, Climate Change, Tropical Cyclones and Floods

Nächstes Kapitel Destruction Patterns and Mechanisms of Coastal Levees on the Sendai Bay Coast Hit by the 2011 Tsunami

Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2007) The boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE): mechanism, consequence assessment, management. J Hazard Mater 141:489–519CrossRef

Abe K (1993) Estimate of tsunami heights from earthquake magnitudes. In: Proceedings of the IUGG/IOC international tsunami symposium TSUNAMI’93, Wakayama

Abe K (1995) Modeling of the runup heights of the hokkaido-nansei-Oki tsunami of 12 July 1993. Pure Appl Geophys 144(3/4):113–124

Ali SY, Li QM (2008) Critical impact energy for the perforation of metallic plates. Nucl Eng Des 238:2521–2528CrossRef

Antonioni G, Spadoni G, Cozzani V (2009) Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area. J Loss Prev Process Ind 22:614–624CrossRef

ARIA base of BARPI, France. www.aria.environnement.gouv.fr

ASCE (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI standard. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 7–10

Askan A, Yucemen MS (2010) Probabilistic methods for the estimation of potential seismic damage: application to reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey. Struct Saf 32:262–271, ElsevierCrossRef

ATC (2008) Guidelines for Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation from Tsunamis, FEMA P646. Applied Technology Council. Redwood City, California, For the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA.: 158 p

ATC (2011) Coastal Construction Manual, FEMA P-55. Applied Technology Council. Redwood City, California, For the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA. II: 400 p

Batdorf SB (1974) A simplified method of elastic-stability analysis for thin cylindrical shells. NACA report – 874: 25 p

Beltrami GM, Di Risio M (2011) Algorithms for automatic, real-time tsunami detection in wind-wave measurements. Part I: implementation strategies and basic tests. Coast Eng 58:1062–1071, ElsevierCrossRef

Børvik T, Hooperstad OS, Langseth M, Malo KA (2003) Effect of target thickness in blunt projectile penetration of Weldox 460 E steel plates. Int J Impact Eng 28:413–464CrossRef

Burwell D, Tolkova E, Chawla A (2007) Diffusion and dispersion characterization of a numerical tsunami model. Ocean Model 19:10–30, ElsevierCrossRef

CCH (2000) City and county of Honolulu building code. Department of Planning and Permitting of Honolulu Hawaii, Honolulu

CEN (2007) EN 1993-1-6 eurocode 3: design of steel structures, part 1.6: strength and stability of shell structures. CEN, Brussels

Chen L, Rotter M (2012) Buckling of anchored cylindrical shells of uniform thickness under wind load. Eng Struct 41:199–208CrossRef

Cheung KF, Wei Y, Yamazaki Y, Yim SCS (2011) Modeling of 500-year tsunamis for probabilistic design of coastal infrastructures in the pacific northwest. Coast Eng 58:970–985, ElsevierCrossRef

Constantin A (2009) On the relevance of soliton theory to tsunami modelling. Wave Motion 46:420–426, ElsevierCrossRef

Corbet GG, Reid SR, Johnson W (1995) Impact loading of plates and shells by free flying projectiles: a review. J Impact Eng 18:141–230, 0734-743X(95)00023-2CrossRef

Cozzani V, Salzano E (2004) The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure- Part I: probit models. J Hazard Mater A107:67–80CrossRef

Demetracopoulos AC, Hadjitheodorou C, Antonopoulos JA (1994) Statistical and numerical analysis of tsunami wave heights in confined waters. Ocean Eng 21(7):629–643, PergamonCrossRef

Eckert S, Jelinek R, Zeug G, Krausmann E (2012) Remote sensing-based assessment of tsunami vulnerability and risk in Alexandria, Egypt. Appl Geogr 32:714–723, ElsevierCrossRef

Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA, USA. http://www.fema.gov/photolibrary/photo_details.do?id=42405

Flouri ET, Kalligeris N, Alexandrakis G, Kampanis NA, Synolakis CE (2011) Application of a finite difference computational model to the simulation of earthquake generated tsunamis. Appl Numer Math 67:111–125. doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2011.06.003, ElsevierCrossRef

GEBCO (2012) General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans. Retrieved 15 June 2012, from www.gebco.net

Godoy LA (2007) Performance of storage tanks in oil facilities damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. J Perform Constructed Facil 21(6):441–449CrossRef

Goto Y (2008) Tsunami damage to oil storage tanks. In: The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing

Goto K, Chagué-Goff C, Fujino S, Goff J, Jaffe B, Nishimura Y, Richmond B, Sugawara D, Szczucinski W, Tappin DR, Witter RC, Yulianto E (2011) New insights of tsunami hazard from the 2011 Tohoku-oki event. Mar Geol 290:46–50, ElsevierCrossRef

Grasso VF, Singh A (2008) Global environmental alert service (GEAS). Adv Space Res 41:1836–1852, ElsevierCrossRef

Haugen KB, Lovholt F, Harbitz CB (2005) Fundamental mechanisms for tsunami generation by submarine mass flows in idealised geometries. Mar Metroleum Geol 22:209–217, ElsevierCrossRef

Heidarzadeh M, Pirooz MD, Zaker NH (2009) Modeling of the near-field effects of the worst-case tsunami in the Makran subduction zone. Ocean Eng 36:368–376, ElsevierCrossRef

Helal MA, Mehanna MS (2008) Tsunamis from nature to physics. Chaos Solitons Fractals 36:787–796, ElsevierCrossRef

Holden PL (1988) Assessment of missile hazards: review of incident experience relevant to major hazard plant. Safety and reliability directorate, Health & Safety Directorate

INERIS (2011) (in French) Note de caractérisation du comportement des équipements industriels à l’inondation. Rapport d'étude DRA-. Adrien Willot et Agnès Vallée, Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques

Jin D, Lin J (2011) Managing tsunamis through early warning systems: a multidisciplinary approach. Ocean Coast Manag 54:189–199, ElsevierCrossRef

Kharif C, Pelinovsky E (2005) Asteroids impact tsunamis. Physique 6:361–366CrossRef

Koshimura S, Namegaya Y et al (2009) Tsunami fragility – a New measure to identify tsunami damage. J Disaster Res 4(6):479–490

Lees FP (2005) Loss prevention in the process industries, 3rd edn. Butterwort Heinemann, Oxford

Leone F, Lavigne F, Paris R, Denain JC, Vinet F (2011) A spatial analysis of the December 26th, 2004 tsunami-induced damages: lessons learned for a better risk assessment integrating buildings vulnerability. Appl Geogr 31:363–375, ElsevierCrossRef

Liu PLF, Wang X, Salisbury AJ (2009) Tsunami hazard and early warning system in South China Sea. J Asian Earth Sci 36:2–12, ElsevierCrossRef

Lovholt F, Glimsdal S, Harbitz CB, Zamora N, Nadim F, Peduzzi P, Dao H, Smebye H (2011) Tsunami hazard and exposure on the global scale. Earth-Sci Rev, Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.10.002

Lukkunaprasit P, Thanasisathit N et al (2009) Experimental verification of FEMA P646 tsunami loading. J Disaster Res 4(6):410–418

Madsen PA (2010) On the evolution and run-up of tsunamis. J Hydrodyn 22:1–6. doi:10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60160-8, ElsevierCrossRef

Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V (2011) Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites : on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. J Loss Prev Process Industries 24(5):477–523CrossRef

Mebarki A, Mercier F, Nguyen QB, Ami Saada R, Meftah F, Reimeringer M (2007) A probabilistic model for the vulnerability of metal plates under the impact of cylindrical projectiles. J Loss Prev Process Industries 20:128–134CrossRef

Mebarki A, Genatios C, Lafuente M (2008a) Risques Naturels et Technologiques : Aléas, Vulnérabilité et Fiabilité des Constructions – vers une formulation probabiliste intégrée. Presses Ponts et Chaussées, Paris, ISBN 978-2-85978-436-2

Mebarki A, Mercier F, Nguyen QB, Ami Saada R, Meftah F, Reimeringer M (2008b) Reliability analysis of metallic targets under metallic rods impact: towards a simplified probabilistic approach. J Loss Prev Process Industries 21:518–527CrossRef

Mebarki A, Mercier F, Nguyen QB, Ami Saada R (2009a) Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities. Part I: probabilistic description of the source terms. J Loss Prev Process Industries 22(4):408–416. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.006 CrossRef

Mebarki A, Mercier F, Nguyen QB, Ami Saada R (2009b) Structural fragments and explosions in industrial facilities. Part II: projectile trajectory and probability of impact. J Loss Prev Process Industries 22(4):417–425, 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.005CrossRef

Mebarki A (2009) A comparative study of different PGA attenuation and error models: case of 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Tectonophysics 466:300–306CrossRef

Mingguang Z, Juncheng J (2008) An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. J Hazard Mater 158:280–286CrossRef

Naito C, Cox D et al (2012) Fuel storage container performance during the 2011 Tohoku japan tsunami. J Perform Constr Fac, 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000339

Nandasena NAK, Paris R, Tanaka N (2011) Reassessment of hydrodynamic equations: minimum flow velocity to initiate boulder transport by high energy events (storms, tsunamis). Mar Geol 281:70–84, ElsevierCrossRef

Neilson AJ (1985) Empirical equations for the perforation of mild steel plates. J Impact Eng 3:137–142CrossRef

Nishi H (2012) Damage on Hazardous Materials Facilities. In: international symposium on engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo

Nistor I, Palermo D et al (2010) Experimental and numerical modeling of tsunami loading on structures. In: International conference on coastal engineering, ASCE

Nistor I, Palermo D et al (2010b) In: Kim YC (ed) Tsunami-induced forces on structures. Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, pp 261–286

Norio O, Ye T, Kajitani Y, Shi P, Tatano H (2011) The 2011 Eastern Japan great earthquake disaster: overview and comments. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2(1):34–42CrossRef

Ohte S, Yoshizawa H, Chiba N, Shida S (1982) Impact strength of steel plates struck by projectiles. Bull Japan Soc Mech Eng 25:1226–1231CrossRef

Palermo D, Nistor I (2008) Tsunami-induced loading on structures. Structure Magazine 3:10–13

Pophet N, Kaewbanjak N, Asavanant J, Ioualalen M (2011) High grid resolution and parallelized tsunami simulation with fully nonlinear Boussinesq equations. Comput Fluids 40:258–268, ElsevierCrossRef

Reese S, Bradley BA, Bind J, Smart G, Power W, Sturman J (2011) Empirical building fragilities from observed damage in the 2009 South Pacific tsunami. Earth Sci Rev 107:156–173, ElsevierCrossRef

Ruiz C, Salvatorelli-D’Angelo F, Thompson VK (1989) Elastic response of thin-wall cylindrical vessels to blast loading. Comput Fluids 32(5):1061–1072

Saatçioğlu M (2009) Performance of structures during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and tsunami induced forces for structural design. Earthquake Tsunamis 11:153–178, A. T. Tankut, Springer NetherlandsCrossRef

Sakakiyama T, Matsuura S et al (2009) Tsunami force acting on oil tanks and buckling analysis for tsunami pressure. J Disaster Res 4(6):427–435

Seveso Inspection Tool (2009) Réservoirs de stockage aériens atmosphériques, Deuxième version test, CRC/SIT/012-F

Sladen A, Hébert H, Schindelé F, Reymond D (2007) L’aléa tsunami en polynésie française : apports de la simulation numérique. C R Géosci 339:303–316, ElsevierCrossRef

Suguino H, Iwabuchi Y et al (2008) Development of probabilistic methodology for evaluating tsunami risk on nuclear power plants. In: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing

Talaslidis DG, Manolis GD, Paraskevopoulos E, Panagiotopoulos C, Pelekasis N (2004) The Sun website, UK: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3615721/Four-die-in-oil-refinery-explosion.html

TNO (2005a) Methods for the calculation of possible damage to people and objects resulting from releases from hazardous materials. The Green Book CPR16E

TNO (2005b) Methods for the calculations of physical effects – due to release of hazardous materials (liquids and gases). The Yellow Book CPR14E 2005

Todorovska MII, Hayir A, Trifunac MD (2002) A note on tsunami amplitudes above submarine slides and slumps. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:129–141, ElsevierCrossRef

Tsamopoulos JA (2004) Risk analysis of industrial structures under extreme transient loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:435–448CrossRef

Università degli Studi di Torino. Laboratory of Molecular Electrochemistry, Italy. http://lem.ch.unito.it/didattica/infochimica/2008_Esplosivi/Explosion.html

USGS (2011) United States Geological Survey. Retrieved 13/03/2012, 2012, from www.usgs.gov

van den Berg AC (1985) The multi-energy method, a framework for vapor cloud explosion blast prediction. J Hazard Mater 12:1–10CrossRef

van Zijll de Jong SL, Dominey-Howes D, Roman CE, Calgaro E, Gero A, Veland S, Bird DK, Muliaina T, Tuiloma-Sua D, Afioga TL (2011) Process, practice and priorities – key lessons learnt undertaking sensitive social reconnaissance research as part of an (UNESCO-IOC) International Tsunami Survey Team. Earth-Sci Rev 107:174–192, ElsevierCrossRef

Ward SN (2011) In: Gupta HK (ed) Tsunamis. Encyclopedia of solid earth geophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1473–1492

Wijetunge JJ (2006) Tsunami on 26 December 2004: spatial distribution of tsunami height and the extent of inundation in Sri Lanka. Sci Tsunami Haz 24(3):225–240

Wilson RI, Dengler LA, Goltz JD, Legg MR, Miller KM, Ritchie A, Whitmore PM (2011) Emergency response and field observation activities of geoscientists in California (USA) during the September 29, 2009, Samoa Tsunami. Earth-Sci Rev 107:193–200, ElsevierCrossRef

Xie M (2007) Thermodynamic and gas dynamic aspects of a BLEVE, Delft University of Technology, No.: 04–200708

Yeh H (2008) Maximum fluid forces in the tsunami runup zone. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 132(6):496–501CrossRef

Zhang DH, Yip TL, Ng CO (2009) Predicting tsunami arrivals: estimates and policy implications. Mar Policy 33:643–650, ElsevierCrossRef

Zhao BB, Duan WY, Webster WC (2011) Tsunami simulation with Green-Naghdi theory. Ocean Eng 3:389–396, ElsevierCrossRef

Titel: Domino Effects and Industrial Risks: Integrated Probabilistic Framework – Case of Tsunamis Effects
verfasst von: Ahmed Mebarki
Sandra Jerez
Igor Matasic
Gaëtan Prodhomme
Mathieu Reimeringer
Vincent Pensee
Quang Anh Vu
Adrien Willot
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Buch: Tsunami Events and Lessons Learned
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7268-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-007-7269-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7269-4_15