Skip to main content

Engagement and Liveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Young Audiences, Theatre and the Cultural Conversation

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 12))

Abstract

Theatre offers a compelling experience for many young people. It engages the intellect, the emotions and the senses. It invites its audience to peer into the private worlds of others where emotions, ideas, relationships are laid bare. In response, engaged spectators claim that they experience more intense emotion than is available to them in their everyday lives. This chapter seeks to share with readers why many young people in the TheatreSpace study found their live theatre experiences to be intensely engaging. It begins with a general discussion of the presence and importance of emotion in the response of theatre goers. It then discusses the process of conceptual blending and its role in creating strong emotion for audiences at live theatre events. Following that the chapter offers insight into different types of audience response before considering four other characteristics of the experience of liveness that contribute to engagement: awareness of the audience, risk, realness and relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barker, M. (2003). Crash, theatre audiences, and the idea of ‘liveness’. Studies in Theatre and Performance, 23(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Chaim, D. (1984). Distance in the theatre: The aesthetics of audience response. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, H. (1992). To all appearances: Ideology and performance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. (2005). From children’s perspectives: A model of aesthetic processing in theatre. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J., & Schonmann, S. (2009). Theorizing aesthetic transactions from children’s criterial values in theatre for young audiences. Youth Theatre Journal, 23, 50–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1975). The act of creation. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijn, E. (1999). Spotlight on spectators: Emotions in the theatre. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, B. (2007). Falsifiable theories for theatre and performance studies. Theatre Journal, 59(4), 553–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, W. (2009). Theatre research in the Nordic countries (2002–2008). Theatre Research International, 34(1), 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmakers, H. (1988). To be, wanting to be, forced to be: Identification processes in theatrical situations. In W. Sauter (Ed.), New directions in audience research: Advances in reception and audience research 2 (pp. 138–163). Utrecht: Tijdschrift voor Theaterwetenschap – International Federation for Theatre Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penny Bundy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

INTERLUDE

INTERLUDE

8.1.1 Case Studies 15 and 16

CASE 15: Moth by Declan Greene

COMPANY: Arena Theatre

VENUE: The Tower Theatre, CUB Malthouse

CASE STUDY PERFORMANCE: 7 pm, Wednesday 26 May 2010

SEASON: 13 May–30 May 2010

figure b
figure a

KEY INFORMANTS:

Chris Kohn, Director, Moth and Artistic Director, Arena Theatre Company

Declan Greene, Playwright

Sarah Ogden, Actor (Melbourne and Sydney seasons)

Teacher from one of the attending schools

AUDIENCES DETAILS: The research team identified three distinct audience profiles of young people attending Moth: a Year 10 Drama class of intermittent theatre-goers from a Catholic girls’ school; a highly theatre literate Year 10 Drama class of regular theatre-goers from an independent co-educational school; regularly attending independent theatre-goers.

Pre-show audience surveys

28

Post-show interviewees

34

6 month interviewees

5

RESEARCH TEAM:

Partner Chief Investigator: Angela O’Brien

Co-Chief Investigator: Clare Irvine

Lead Research Assistant: Meg Upton

State Project Officer: Tim Stitz

Research Assistants: Georgina Capper, Sarah Lockwood, John O’Toole, Madonna Stinson

  • Word of mouth was a significant feature of attraction for the young audience. The data suggests that being able to talk about the experience of theatre in a meaningful way cements its value. An analysis of one school group, regular theatre-goers both with their school and in their own leisure time with family and friends, demonstrates that not being able to talk about the theatre experience presents a barrier to sustained attendance. This cohort, whilst they enjoyed Moth , was not able to explain their experience to their other significant theatre partners (such as family and friends).

  • The intimate performance space was reported by the young people to work well for this production and facilitated their engagement with the performers. The venue was also seen as a positive and welcoming environment for young people and encouraged their attendance at this production.

CASE 16: Fat Pig by Neil LaBute

COMPANY: Queensland Theatre Company

VENUE: Bille Brown Studio, Queensland Theatre Company

CASE STUDY PERFORMANCE: 6.30 pm, 8 June/7.30 pm 24 June 2010

SEASON: 31 May–26 June 2010

figure c
figure d

KEY INFORMANTS:

Katie Stewart, Education Liaison Officer, QTC

Two teachers from each of the attending schools

AUDIENCES DETAILS: One case study production was a night with a number of schools in the audience, whilst the other was designated an under 30s night especially scheduled by QTC. There were two distinct audience cohorts in this case study: young adult theatre enthusiasts, aged between 19 and 27 years, and Year 11 secondary Drama students aged from 15 to 17 years, many of whom were first time theatre-goers.

Pre-show audience surveys

98

Post-show interviewees

69

6 month interviewees

7

RESEARCH TEAM:

Chief Investigator: Bruce Burton

Partner Chief Investigator: Penny Bundy

Lead Research Assistant: Dianne Fenlon

State Project Officer: Andrea Burton

Research Assistants: Gabrielle Castle, Ali Clinch, Chelsea Thomas, Nadia Vanek

  • The language of pleasure and engagement was dominant in the students’ responses, while the technical language of theatre was largely absent. Use of technical theatre language did not necessarily correlate with the young people’s level of engagement or enjoyment.

  • Humour and politically incorrect dialogue contributed significantly to the respondents’ engagement. Shock value, a sense of unease, and cathartic laughter characterised the young people’s responses to the performance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bundy, P. (2014). Engagement and Liveness. In: O'Toole, J., Adams, RJ., Anderson, M., Burton, B., Ewing, R. (eds) Young Audiences, Theatre and the Cultural Conversation. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7609-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics