Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role of research in relation to educational design and development activities. The first part of the chapter focuses on the rationale and basic principles of development research by outlining motives for conducting formative research, analyzing definitions and aims of various types of development research, and discussing several of its key characteristics. The second part of the chapter deals with methods of development research, exploring some of its typical problems and dilemmas, and discussing several challenges for further action and reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brinkerhoff, R.O., Brethouwer, D.M., Hluchyi. T. and Nowakoski, J.R., 1983, Program evaluation: A practitioner’s guide for trainers and educators, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., 1992, Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1997, The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., 1992, Towards a design science of education, In Scanlon, E. and O’Shea, T. (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J., 1991, Action research for educational change, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg, B.N., 1990, Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K., 1994, Developing realistic mathematics education, Doctoral dissertation, Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.G., Collins, A. and Resnick, L., 1996, Cognition and learning, In Berliner, D.C. and Calfee, R.C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J.L. (Ed.), 1987, Program evaluation kit, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S., 1997, International action research: A casebook for educational reform, Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, J.W.M., 1993, Towards design standards for curriculum consitency in corporate education, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keursten, P., 1994, Courseware-ontwikkeling met het oog op implementatie: De docent centraal [Courseware development from an implementation perspective: A central role for the teacher], Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P., 1995, “Developmental research” as a way to empirically based “didactical structure” of science, Science Education, 79, 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994, Qualtative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moonen, J., 1996, Prototyping as a design method, In Plomp, T, and Ely, D.P. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 186–190), Pergamon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieveen, N.M., 1997, Computer support for curriculum developers: A study on the potential of computer support in the domain of formative curriculum evaluation, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M. and Frick, Th.W., 1999, Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories, In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory, Volume II (pp. 633–651), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C. and Nelson, W.A., 1996, Developmental research, In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213–1245), Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roes, M.A., 1997, Nascholing op basis Van lesvoorbeelden in de context Van curriculumvernieuwing [Inservice education based on exemplary lesson materials within the context of curriculum renewal], Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M., 1996, In Cooley W., Gage, N. and Scriven, M., “The vision thing”, Educational research and the AERA in the 21st century, Competing visions of what educational researchers should do, Educational Researcher, 26(4), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.L., 1993, Flexibility in the evaluation of emergent programs, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16, 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., 1993, Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training, Kogan Page, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, A., 1999, Supporting science curriculum reform in Botswana: The potential of peer coaching, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan, S., 1991, Formative evaluation in performance technology, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(2), 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Akker, J. and Plomp, T., 1993, Development research in curriculum: Propositions and experiences, Paper presented at AERA meeting, April 12-16, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, E., 1996, Effects of inservice education on implementation of elementary science, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, L., 1998, The development of motivational communication in distance education support, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J.M., 1993, Courseware for an inquiry-based science curriculum: An implementation perspective, Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D.F., 1992, Methodological issues in curriculum research, In Jackson, P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 98–118), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. and Bresler, L., 1993, Development research: Definitions, methods, and criteria, Paper presented at AERA meeting, April 12-16, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K., 1994, Case study research: Design and methods (2nd edition), Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and Methods of Development Research. In: van den Akker, J., Branch, R.M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., Plomp, T. (eds) Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5845-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4255-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics