Skip to main content

Design-Team Performance: Metrics and the Impact of Technology

  • Chapter
Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS,volume 46))

Abstract

For more than fifteen years the Stanford University Center for Design Research has been concerned with the formal study of engineering product development teams at work in academic and corporate settings. This chapter describes one such effort, the implementation of team-based, distance-learning techniques in a Stanford University School of Engineering course, Team-Based Design-Development with Corporate Partners. The course is distributed nationally by the Stanford Instructional Television Network for on-campus, full-time students and off-campus, industry-based part-time students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atman, C, Leifer, L., Olds, B., & Miller, R. (1995). Innovative assessment opportunities [videotape]. (Available from the National Technical University satellite broadcast, Fort Collins, CO.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baya, V., Givins, J., Baudin, C., Mabogunje, A., Toye, G., & Leifer, L. (1992). An experimental study of design information reuse. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (pp. 141–147). Scottsdale, AZ: ASME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, M.F., Sheppard, S.D., & Leifer, L.J. (1995). How students connect engineering fundamentals to hardware design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Engineering Design. Prague, (pp. 336–342) Zurich, Switzerland: Heurista.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, E.M., & Hallinger, P. (1995). Problem Based Learning: In leadership development. ERIC Clearinghouse on Education Management, Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs-Myers, I., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Mvers-Briggs Type Indicator. 2nd Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, J.E. (1968). A grammar of standard English. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, D., et al. (1992). A practical part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Applied Natural Language Processing Conference. Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harb, J., Durrant, S., & Terry, R. (1993). Use of the Kolb Learning Cycle and the 4MAT System in engineering education. ASEE Journal of Engineering Education. 82,(3), 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., & Leifer, L. (1995). Using the WWW to support project-team formation. In Proceedings of the FIE 95 25th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference on Engineering Education for the 21st Century. Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Toye, G., & Leifer, L. (1995). Personal electronic notebook with sharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE). Berkeley Springs, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, L. (1995). Evaluating product-based-learning education. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Evaluation of Engineering Education. Osaka, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, L., Koseff, J., & Lenshow, R. (1995, August). PBL White paper. Report from the International Workshop on Project-Based-Learning, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje, A. (1997). Measuring mechanical design process performance: A question based approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje, A., Leifer, L., Levitt, R.E., & Baudin, C. (1995). ME 210-VDT: A managerial framework for measuring and improving design process performance. In Proceedings of the FIE’ 95, 25th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference on Engineering Education for the 21st Century, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneman, S. (1991). The social construction of a technical reality: Empirical studies of group engineering design practice. (Xerox PARC Technical Report SSL-91-22) Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. (ed.) (1990). Vygotsky and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. (1989). Listing, drawing and gesturing in design: A study of the use of shared workspaces by design teams. (Xerox PARC Technical Report SSL-89-3) Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toye, G., Cutkosky, M., Leifer, L., Tenenbaum, M., & Glicksman, J. (1994). SHARE: A methodology and environment for collaborative product development. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems. 3(2), 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D. J. (1993). Changes among ASEE creativity workshop participants. Journal of Engineering Education. 82(3), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D. J. (1993, September). Mathematical resolution of MBTI data into personality type components. Paper presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 1993 Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D. J. (1997). Using student preferences to guide design team composition. In Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers 1997 Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, D. J., & Barberet, J. (1995). A Jungian theory for constructing creative design teams. Proceedings of the 1995 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. 2(83) 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leifer, L. (1998). Design-Team Performance: Metrics and the Impact of Technology. In: Brown, S.M., Seidner, C.J. (eds) Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6031-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4850-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics