Skip to main content

1989 | Buch

The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking

verfasst von: Gordon Tullock

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Buchreihe : Studies in Public Choice

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

As the reader of this book probably already knows, I have devoted a great deal of time to the topic which is, rather unfortunately, named rent seeking. Rent seeking, the use of resources in actually lowering total product although benefiting some minority, is, unfortunately, a major activity of most governments. As a result of this, I have stumbled on a puzzle. The rent-seeking activity found in major societies is immense, but the industry devoted to producing it is nowhere near as immense. In Washington the rent-seeking industry is a very conspicuous part of the landscape. On the other hand, if you consider how much money is being moved by that industry, then it is comparatively small. The first question that this book seeks to answer is: How do we account for the disparity? A second problem is that almost all rent seeking is done in what superficially appears to be an extremely inefficient way. I recently got estimates of the net cost to the public of the farm program and its net benefit to the farmers. The first is many times the second. Indeed, it is not at all obvious that in the long run, today's farmers are better off than they would be if the program had never been implemented. Of course, in any given year, cancelling the program would be quite painful. The first section of this book, then, is devoted to this problem.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter

Why is the Rent-Seeking Industry so Small?

Frontmatter
1. Introduction
Abstract
During the time I was living in Washington, D.C., I was impressed with the size and general prosperity of the rent-seeking industry in that city. As I grew to know more about it, however, I began to wonder why it was not much bigger. Not far from my apartment, for example, was the headquarters building of the dairy lobby. It was a moderate-sized office building, nowhere near as big as one would think justified by the roughly $500 million a year the dairy farmers were taking out of the taxpayers’ pockets. Considering the expenditures that benefit only special interests and the regulations that raise prices for the benefit of similar groups, one would assume total social costs of about $200 billion a year. Given these figures, the rent-seeking industry is surprisingly small.
Gordon Tullock
2. Rents, Ignorance, and Ideology
Abstract
This chapter will begin my substantive efforts to explain the small size of the rent-seeking industry. In it I will make some modifications in the theory which are intended to make it fit the world better. The change will not appear gigantic and indeed I do not think it is, but it is a movement toward greater realism. Furthermore, it does not in any way reduce the waste that has normally been blamed on rent seeking. In my “Rents and Rent Seeking,”1 I greatly expanded this waste, and this chapter leaves that expansion intact. In essence, the quantity of waste is left unchanged, but the form of that waste is altered.
Gordon Tullock
3. The Cost of Rent Seeking: A Metaphysical Problem
Abstract
We know that one of the reasons congressmen vote for such things as protective tariffs and the farm subsidy program is that they think it will attract votes. Economists are almost always opposed to these items because they think they injure the voters. Technically speaking, what happens is that the voters specialize their vote, i.e., concentrate their entire preference function on one particular issue (or a few issues) that has considerable importance to them. Other voters concentrating their voting decision on other special issues ignore the well being of the first voter.
Gordon Tullock
4. Efficient Rent Seeking, Diseconomies of Scale, Public Goods, and Morality
Abstract
To most economists, the immediate solution to the problem with which this general section deals would be the possibility of either diseconomies of scale or public goods. I have deferred their discussion up to this point because neither one of them would explain the inefficiency of the means normally used to transfer resources. Also, if used by themselves, rather remarkable parameters have to be assumed. Nevertheless, they can be used to supplement the explanations in the previous two chapters.
Gordon Tullock

Random Thoughts on Rent Seeking

Frontmatter
5. Rent Seeking: The Problem of Definition
Abstract
Some time ago, I received a paper for comment arguing that the current patent process generated rent seeking. The author’s point was that because the patent being a monopoly, and, in many cases a valuable one, a considerable number of people would engage in attempting to get the patent, and this would be a wasteful duplication of research. In essence, as result of this waste, scientific progress was “too fast.”
Gordon Tullock
6. Rent Seeking and the Market
Abstract
Rent seeking has, to a considerable extent, developed as a separate subdiscipline, with relatively little direct connection to the regular microeconomics of markets. No criticism is intended here, since its field of study is largely nonmarket activities or market activities normally thought to be undesirable. In general, rent-seeking arguments have reinforced the normative arguments against monopoly and other special privileges which the regular economists deduced earlier and on different grounds. Nevertheless, it is somewhat desirable to link the two fields directly.
Gordon Tullock
7. Strategic Behavior, Mixed Strategies, and the Defects of the Nash Equilibrium
Abstract
My objections to the use of the Nash equilibrium can be summed up under two headings: that the simplification necessary for model building in this case eliminates certain essential aspects of the real world; and that, with mixed strategies, the whole Nash equilibrium literature raises logical issues similar to the paradox of the liar.
Gordon Tullock
8. Rent Seeking and Transfers
Abstract
In general, authors talking about rent seeking have used transfers more or less interchangeably with monopolistic restrictions. To a large extent, both are the result of rent-seeking activity and normally involve very large inefficiencies. A few hackles might be raised, but it should be pointed out that most government transfers are not from the wealthy to the poor but from the poorly politically organized to the well politically organized.
Gordon Tullock
9. Rent Seeking and Tax Reform
Abstract
As a former expert on China, I know that the rectification of terms is a central preoccupation of Confucian scholars. Therefore, I believe the best way to begin this chapter is with a brief discussion of the meaning of both tax reform and rent seeking. I repeat my earlier definition of rent seeking: the use of resources for the purpose of obtaining rents for people where the rents themselves come from something that has negative social value.
Gordon Tullock
10. Concluding Thoughts
Abstract
In the fifties, I worked as a specialist on China for the Department of State. I lived in Nationalist and Communist China and in President Rhee’s Korea.1 Although at the time I did not think about rent seeking (indeed, I would have simply called these regimes corrupt),2 undoubtedly this experience had a lot to do with my eventual discovery of rent seeking.
Gordon Tullock
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking
verfasst von
Gordon Tullock
Copyright-Jahr
1989
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Electronic ISBN
978-94-015-7813-4
Print ISBN
978-90-481-5779-2
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7813-4