Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences pp 199–244Cite as

Metaphors in the Social Sciences: Making Use and Making Sense of Them

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Origins ((ORIN,volume 1))

Abstract

Ever since scholarly discourse has concerned itself with metaphors the latter have been recognized as something disturbing the order of things and/or the order of words designating the former. Foremost exemplars of the improper, metaphors toy around with correct meanings and conventionalized usages: at best, one holds that they have no relation to true knowledge at all and lets them pass because of their merely decorous role. More often, however, suspecting the worst, one is afraid of their outright deceptive effects. Conventional genealogy cites Aristotle as forebearer for this basic fear and the rejection of metaphors within proper discourse — a philosophy James J. Bono pointedly refers to as the philosophy of a land dweller: suffused with tropes of solidity this philosophy is a “terra firma upon which stable things and determinate, literal, proper meanings can be anchored” (Bono 1997, 9) — to this landscape metaphors simply do not belong.

This article is part of a broader endeavor pursued by Peter Weingart and me. It aims at developing metaphor analysis as a novel tool within the framework of sociology of knowledge. Especially section 3 and 4 contain thoughts and material of our joint publication on “The order of meaning: The Career of Chaos as a Metaphor”, Configurations, 5 (1997), pp. 463 – 520. While I thank Peter Weingart cordially for thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this paper, I am, of course, fully responsible for the result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANDERSON, P.W., K. ARROW & D. PINES, The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Redwood City (Ca), Addison-Wesley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNETT, W.A., A.J. GEWEKE, K. SHELL, Economic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles, and Nonlinearities, New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNETT, W., P. CHEN, Dynamic Econometric Modeling, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENHABIB, J., RICHARD D. Day, “Rational Choice and Erratic Behavior”, Review of Economic Studies, 48 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • BERGGREN, Douglas, “The Use and Abuse of Metaphor (Part I and II)”, Review of Metaphysics, 16 (1963), pp. 237–258, 450–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLACK, Max, Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Ithaca (N.Y.), Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • BONO, James J. (1997), “Metaphor and Scientific Change: From Representational to Performative Understandings of Metaphor and Scientific Practice”, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for the Social Study of Science, October 1997, Tuczon, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • BONO, James J., “Science, Discourse, and Literature: The Role/Rule of Metaphor in Science”, in: Stuart PETERFREUND (ed.), Literature and Science: Theory and Practice, Boston, Northeastern University Press, 1990, pp. 59–89

    Google Scholar 

  • BRIGGS, John, F. DAVID PEAT, Turbulent Mirror: An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness, New York, Harper & Row, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • BROMME, Rainer, “Beyond One’s Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity,” in: Peter Weingart & Nico Stehr (eds.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity, Toronto, Toronto University Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURKE, Kenneth, “Four Master Tropes,”Kenyon Review, 3 (1941), pp. 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • BURLINGAME, Gary M., Addie FUHRIMAN, Karl A. BARNUM, “Group Therapy as a Nonlinear Dynamical System: Analysis of Therapeutic Communication for Chaotic Patterns”, in: Frederick David ABRAHAM & Albert R. GILGEN (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1995, pp. 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • CACIOPPO, J.T. & L.G. TASSINARY, “Centenary of William James’ Principles of Psychology: From the Chaos of Mental Life to the Sciences of Psychology”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAMBERLAIN, Linda, “Strange Attractors in Patterns of Family Interaction”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, Ted, “Metaphor and the Cultivation of Intimacy”, Critical Inquiry, 3 (1978), pp. 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CREEDY, John & Vance L. MARTIN, “Introduction and Outline”, in: John CREEDY & Vance L. MARTIN (eds.).Chaos and Nonlinear Models in Economics: Theory and Applications, Aldershot-Brookfield, Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIDSON, Donald, “What Metaphors Mean”, in: Mark JOHNSON (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAY, Richard, “The Emergence of Chaos from Classical Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5 (1983), pp. 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEBATIN, Bernhard, Die Rationalität der Metapher. Eine sprachphilosophische und kommunikationstheoretische Untersuchung, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE COSTER, G.P. & D.W. MITCHELL, “Dynamic Implications of Chaotic Monetary Policy”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 14 (1992), pp. 267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDWARDS, Derek, Discourse and Cognition, London, Thousand Oaks; New Dehli, Sage, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOUCAULT, Michel, Die Ordnung des Diskurses, Frankfurt-Berlin-Wien, Ullstein, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, Walter, “Foreword”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah, (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. ix–xi.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARFINKEL, Harold, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIOVACCHINI, Peter L., “Eroticism and Chaos”, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 18 (1990), pp. 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLEICK, James, Chaos: Making of a New Science, New York, Penguin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOODMAN, Nelson & Catherine Z. ELGIN, Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Indianapolis, Hacket, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLDSTEIN, Jeffrey, “Unbalancing Psychoanalytic Theory: Moving beyond the Equilibrium Model of Freud’s thought”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • GROSS, Alan G., The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge (Ma)-London, Harvard Univ. Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • GROTSTEIN, James S., “Nothingness, Meaninglessness, and Chaos in Psychoanalysis”, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 26 (1990), pp. 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • HARRIES, Karsten, “The Many Uses of Metaphors”, Critical Inquiry, 5 (1978), pp. 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HARRINGTON, Anne, “Metaphoric Connections: Holistic Science in the Shadow of the Third Reich”, Social Research, 62 (1995), pp. 357–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYLES, N. Kathrine, Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science, Ithaca-London, Cornell Univ. Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESSE, Mary, “The Explanatory Function of Metaphor”, in: Yehuda BAR-HILLEL (ed.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1972, pp. 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESTER, Marcus B., The Meaning of Poetic Metaphor, The Hague, Mouton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOBBES, Thomas, Leviathan (1651), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANITSCHEIDER, Bernulf, “Philosophische Reflexionen über Chaos und Ordnung”, in: Heinz-Otto PEITGEN, Hartmut JüRGENS, Dietmar SAUPE (eds.), Bausteine der Ordnung, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAY, Lily A., “Who Wrote the Book of Life ? Information and Transformation of Molecular Biology, 1945–55”, Science in Context, 8 (1995), pp. 604–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KITTAY, Eva Feder, Metaphor. Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNEALE, Dennis, “Market Chaos: Scientists Seek Pattern in Stock Prices”, Wall Street Journal, Nov. 17, 1987, sect. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • KNORR-CETINA, Karin, “The Scientist as an Analogical Reasoner: A Critique of the Metaphor-Theory of Innovation”, Communication and Cognition, 13 (1980), pp. 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAKOFF, George, & Mark JOHNSON, “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language”, The Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980), pp. 453–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LAKOFF, George, “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust”, Social Research, 62 (1995), pp. 177–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOCKE, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding(1690), London, Basset.

    Google Scholar 

  • LORENZ, Edward, “Deterministic Nonperiod Flow”, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20 (1963), pp. 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUHMANN, Niklas, “Gesellschaftliche Struktur und Semantische Tradition”, in: Niklas LUHMANN, Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modern Gesellschaft, Band 1, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAASEN, Sabine, “Who is afraid of Metaphors ?”, in Sabine MAASEN, Everett MENDELSOHN, Peter WEINGART (eds.), Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer, 1994, pp. 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAASEN, Sabine, & Peter WEINGART, “Metaphors — Messengers of Meaning. A Contribution to an Evolutionary Sociology of Science”, Science Communication, 17 (1995), pp. 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAC CORMAC, Earl. R., A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor, Cambridge, (Mas)-London, M.I.T. Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • MANDELBROT, Benoit (1977), The Fractal Geometry of Nature, San Francisco, Freeman, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAXWELL, J.C., Matter and Motion, New York, Macmillan, 1877.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIROWSKI, Philip, “From Mandelbrot to Chaos in Economic Theory”, Southern Economic Journal, 57 (1990), pp. 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PEAT, David F., “The Geometrization of Thought”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 359 – 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • POINCARé, H., Les Méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste, Paris, Gauthiers-Villars, 1892. English translation: Springfield, Federal Clearinghouse, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • RADMAN, Zdravko, Metaphors: Figures of the Mind, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHARDS, Ivor Armstrong, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICOEUR, Paul, “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling”, Critical Inquiry, 5 (1978), pp. 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, Robin, “Chaos Theory and the Relationship between Psychology and the Sciences”, in: Robin ROBERTSON & Allan COMBS (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 3 – 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, Robin, & Allan COMBS, Chaos Theory in Psychology and the Life Sciences, Mahwah (N.J.), Erlbaum, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • RORTY, Richard, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ROSSER, J.B., Jr., “Chaos Theory and New Keynsean Economics”, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 58 (1991), pp. 256–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • SABELLI, Hector et al., “Psychocardiological Portraits: A Clinical Application of Process Theory”, in: Frederick David ABRAHAM &, Albert R. GILGEN (eds.), Chaos Theory in Psychology, Westport, Greenwood Press, 1995, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAFAN-GERARD, Desy, “Chaos and Control in the Creative Process”, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 13 (1990), pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHEFFLER, I., “The Myths of Metaphor”, Communication and Cognition, 19(1986), pp. 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEPAN, Nancy Leys, “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science”, Critiques & Contentions, 11(1986), pp. 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEVENSON, Howard, & Susan HARMELING, “Entrepeneurial Management’s Need for a More ‘Chaotic’ Theory”, Journal of Business Venturing, 1990, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • TURBAYNE, Colin Murray, The Myth of Metaphor, New Haven-London, Yale Univ. Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN BRAKEL, J. & J.P.M. GEURTS, “Pragmatic Identity of Meaning and Metaphor”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2 (1988), 2, 205 – 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VAN BRESIEN, Fred, “Metaphors in Scientific Language”, Communication & Cognition, 22 (1989), pp. 5 – 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN NOPPEN, Jean-Pierre, et al., Metaphor. Bibliography of Post 1970 Publications, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN NOPPEN, Jean-Pierre, & Edith HOLST, Metaphor II. A Classified Bibliography of Publications, 1985–1990, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, Roger M., The Structure of Metaphor. The Way the Language of Metaphor Works, Cambridge (Ma), Blackwell, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLF, G. (1991), “Gestalten von Komplexität durch Netzwerk-Management”, in K.W. KRATNY & F. WALLNER (eds.), Grundprinzipien der Selbstorganisation, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991, pp. 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • YORKE, James, LI, T.-Y. (1975), “Period Three Implies Chaos”, American Mathematical Monthly, 82 (1975), pp. 985–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für psychologische Forschung, München, Germany

    Sabine Maasen

Authors
  1. Sabine Maasen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ghent, Belgium

    Fernand Hallyn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maasen, S. (2000). Metaphors in the Social Sciences: Making Use and Making Sense of Them. In: Hallyn, F. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Origins, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9442-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9442-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5559-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9442-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation