Skip to main content

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in the Space of Debate

  • Chapter
Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ((CULS,volume 2))

Abstract

Cutting across the common distinction between learning to argue and arguing to learn, this research is concerned with arguing to learn argumentative knowledge, or broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. A secondary school experiment compared broadening/deepening of understanding of the space of a debate on genetically modified organisms, using either a CHAT tool, or else an argument-diagram tool (DREW: Dialogical Reasoning Educational Web tool) that was designed as a medium for interactive debate. Although there was no significant difference between the quality of students’ texts before and after debating across the conditions, a new interaction analysis method (“Rainbow”) revealed differences in students’ expression and elaboration of arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainsworth, S.E., Bibby, P.A., & Wood, D.J. (1999). Analysing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M.W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H.P.A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 120–134). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J. & Coirier, P. (Eds.) (1999). Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.J. (1999). Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. In J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Eds.), Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing (pp. 179–202). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M.J. (2002). Argumentative interactions, discursive operations and learning to model in science. In P. Brna, M. Baker, K. Stenning & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), The Role of Communication in Learning to Model (pp. 303–324). Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtine, M. (1929/1977). Le Marxisme et la Philosophie du Langage. Paris: Minuit. [1st edition: Voloshinov, V.N., Leningrad, 1929].

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, E., Lund, K. & Baker, M.J. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken Discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, C. (1996). Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonnon, E. (1996). Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances nouvelles: le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. Langue Française, 112, 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quignard, M. & Baker, M.J. (1999). Favouring modellable computer-mediated argumentative dialogue in collaborative problem-solving situations. In S.P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 129–136). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quignard, M. (in press). A Collaborative Model of Argumentation in Dyadic Problem-Solving Interactions. In F. van Eemeren et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA’02). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. & Hundhausen, C. (2001). Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 577–584). Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J.F. & Means, M.L. (1991). Learning to reason via instruction in argumentation. Learning and Instruction, 1, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, M.J., Quignard, M., Lund, K., Séjourné, A. (2003). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in the Space of Debate. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0195-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics