Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital Games, Mathematics and Visuospatial Reasoning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Games and Mathematics Learning

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 4))

Abstract

Advances in technology have blurred the boundary between representing shapes and objects in two and three dimensions. Similarly, the capacity to translate and transform shapes and objects has moved beyond static and concrete form to representations that are increasingly dynamic and animated. This chapter describes young children’s engagement with digital games as they interpret and navigate information using numeracy understandings and mathematics knowledge. In particular, the chapter highlights case studies of gamers utilising visuospatial reasoning as they solve problems in environments which require high levels of decoding. The chapter is underpinned by the notion that the embodied game space (i.e., the inside and outside space of the game environment) captures the interplay between how mathematics content is represented and the game’s architecture space. This multifaceted and multimodal access to information requires quite different demands than the mathematics encountered by students in typical classroom contexts. Games used by children in the case studies include Pokémon, Prince of Persia and The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gestures in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avraamidou, A., Monaghan, J., & Walker, A. (2012). Abstraction through game play. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1–2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1989). Review of research on visualization in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2010). Visual-object ability: A new dimension of non-verbal intelligence. Cognition, 117(3), 276–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Mulligan, J., & Lowrie, T. (2012). Mathematics for children: Challenging children to think mathematically (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender difference in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Vara, C., Zagal, J. P., & Mateas, M. (2007). Evolution of spatial configurations in videogames. In S. de Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Worlds in play: International perspectives on digital games research (pp. 159–168). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, D. (1985). Video games and spatial skills: An exploratory study. Educational Communication and Technology, 33(4), 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. C., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1465–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30, 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., Park, H., Cha, J., & Shin, B. (2008). Effects of object building activities in second life on players’ spatial reasoning. In M. Eisenberg, Kinshuk, M. Chang, & R. McGreal (Eds.), Second IEEE International conference on digital games and intelligent toys based education (pp. 62–69). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DIGITEL.2008.14.

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1976). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: Exploring contemporary methods of communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núnez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, C. A. (2010). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 317–341). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lean, G., & Clements, M. A. (1981). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematics performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Pritchard, C. (2002). Symbolizing space into being. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Vershaffel (Eds.), Symbolization modelling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 59–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T. (2005). Problem solving in technology rich contexts: Mathematics sense making in out-of-school environments. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T. (2011). “If this was real”: Tensions between using genuine artefacts and collaborative learning in mathematics tasks. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., & Clancy, S. (2002). Multimodal texts: Numeracy development in naturalistic learning contexts. In Educational research, risks and dilemmas (Refereed proceedings of the annual conference of AARE/NZARE). Auckland: NZARE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., & Diezmann, C. M. (2009). National numeracy tests: A graphic tells a thousand words. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2011). Gender differences in students’ mathematics game playing. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2244–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2007). Using spatial skills to interpret maps: Problem solving in realistic contexts. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 12(4), 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, G. L. (2007). Situations of play: Patterns of spatial use in videogames. In B. Akira (Ed.), Situated play (Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association conference, pp. 537–545). Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Press. http://www.digra.org/dl/display_html?chid=07312.05363.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nintendo. (1998). Pokémon series [Games]. Tokyo: Game Freak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Spatial anxiety relates to spatial abilities as a function of working memory in children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Initiation rites: A small boy in a poké-world. In J. Tobin (Ed.), Pikachu’s global adventure: The rise and fall of Pokémon (pp. 141–164). London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, V. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieff, M., Ryu, M., Dixon, B., & Hegarty, M. (2012). The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 854–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209–240). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(3), 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks, J. M. (2006). Multiple systems for visuospatial imagery. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2654). http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/docs/p2654.pdf.

  • Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2005). Multiple systems for spatial imagery: Transformations of objects and bodies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 271–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Science, Technology and Mathematics, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Tom Lowrie

Authors
  1. Tom Lowrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Lowrie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Edu, Sci, Tech & Math, University of Canberra, Canberra, Aust Capital Terr, Australia

    Tom Lowrie

  2. Faculty of Edu, Sci, Tech & Math, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Robyn Jorgensen (Zevenbergen)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowrie, T. (2015). Digital Games, Mathematics and Visuospatial Reasoning. In: Lowrie, T., Jorgensen (Zevenbergen), R. (eds) Digital Games and Mathematics Learning. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9517-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation