Abstract
In the Nordic countries, working hour reductions have been introduced as a possible occupational health intervention. We evaluated the effects of a working hour reduction from 37 to 30 h a week among 100 employees within older people’s care. The outcome evaluation was broad, including health check-ups and extensive questionnaires covering work climate, work-home balance, health-related measures, well-being, and health behaviors. The results showed no improvements during the 1-year project period, which raises the question whether the results are due to failure in implementation or theory. This chapter asks what is needed for considering a failure as a theory failure, that is, a default program theory in that the activities fail to bring the desired effects. It is suggested that the case described here may be one such example. In order to facilitate the separation of theory failure from implementation failure, we underscore the importance of program theory, also called theory of change or logic models. By scrutinizing the program theory before implementing an intervention, a critical evaluation of the mechanisms linking the intervention to various outcomes can be made. Also, the program theory is helpful for forming testable hypothesis that allows variation in process factors to be tested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biron, C., & Karanika-Murray, M. (2013). Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. International Journal of Stress Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033227.
Biron, C., Gatrell, C., & Cooper, C. L. (2010). Autopsy of a failure: Evaluating process and contextual issues in an organizational-level work stress intervention. International Journal of Stress Management, 17(2), 135–158. doi:10.1037/a0018772.
Davies, P., Walker, A. E., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implementation Science, 5(1), 14. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-14.
Dobson, D., & Cook, T. J. (1980). Avoiding type III error in program evaluation: Results from a field experiment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 3(4), 269–276.
Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18(2), 237–256.
Egan, M., Bambra, C., Thomas, S., Petticrew, M., Whitehead, M., & Thomson, H. (2007). The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 1. A systematic review of organisational-level interventions that aim to increase employee control. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(11), 945–954.
Hasson, H. (2010). Systematic evaluation of implementation fidelity of complex interventions in health and social care. Implementation Science, 5(1), 67.
Kico, E., & Saksvik, P. Ø. (2013). Derailed, but Implemented – A Study of Two Natural Work-Life Interventions. Paper presented at the Work, Stress and Health, Los Angeles
Klumb, P. (2004). Women, work, and well-being 1950–2000: a review and methodological critique. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 1007–1024. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00262-4.
Lindfors, P., von Thiele Schwarz, U., & Lundberg, U. (2015). Do reduced working hours improve health in women employed in the elder care? Submitted for publication.
Lipsey, M. W., & Cordray, D. S. (2000). Evaluation methods for social intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 345–375.
Mikkelsen, A., Saksvik, P. O., Eriksen, H. R., & Ursin, H. (1999). The impact of learning opportunities and decision authority on occupational health. Work & Stress, 13(1), 20–31. doi:10.1080/026783799296165.
Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2012a). The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work & Stress, 26(2), 91–111. doi:10.1080/02678373.2012.682721.
Nielsen, K., & Randall, R. (2012b). Opening the black box: Presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–17. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.690556.
Nielsen, K., Randall, R., & Albertsen, K. (2007). Participants’ appraisals of process issues and the effects of stress management interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 793–810. doi:10.1002/job.450.
Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Holten, A.-L., & Gonzalez, E. R. (2010a). Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress, 24(3), 234–259. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.515393.
Nielsen, K., Taris, T. W., & Cox, T. (2010b). The future of organizational interventions: Addressing the challenges of today’s organizations. Work & Stress, 24(3), 219–233. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.519176.
Nytrø, K., Saksvik, P. Ø., Mikkelsen, A., Bohle, P., & Quinlan, M. (2000). An appraisal of key factors in the implementation of occupational stress interventions. [Article]. Work & Stress, 14(3), 213–225. doi:10.1080/02678370010024749.
Olsen, K., Legg, S., & Hasle, P. (2012). How to use programme theory to evaluate the effectiveness of schemes designed to improve the work environment in small businesses. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 41, 5999–6006.
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24–34.
Randall, R., Griffiths, A., & Cox, T. (2005). Evaluating organizational stress-management interventions using adapted study designs. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(1), 23–41.
Saksvik, P. Ø., Nytrø, K., Dahl-Jørgensen, C., & Mikkelsen, A. (2002). A process evaluation of individual and organizational occupational stress and health interventions. Work & Stress, 16(1), 37–57. doi:10.1080/02678370110118744.
von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2008). Health and ill health in working women – Balancing work and recovery. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
von Thiele Schwarz, U., & Hasson, H. (2013). Alignment for achieving a healthy organization. In G. Bauer & G. J. Jenny (Eds.), Salutogenic organizations and change – The concepts behind organizational health intervention research. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Thiele Schwarz, U., Hasson, H., Lindfors, P. (2015). Derailed or Failed? A Closer Look at Reduced Working Hours as an Occupational Health Intervention. In: Karanika-Murray, M., Biron, C. (eds) Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9866-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9867-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)