Skip to main content

The Morality of Artificial Agents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics, Law and the Politics of Information

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 18))

Abstract

The informational approach has powerful practical and theoretical consequences on the notions of agency and responsibility. This chapter discusses one of the most crucial questions facing our networked information society today: who is the “who” that performs an action and may be held accountable for the (moral or legal) consequences of that action? It is increasingly likely that the agent is an artificial one, whose autonomous performance of tasks poses the risk of unexpected and potentially harmful effects. How are we to deal with consequences that cannot be traced back directly to a human being? Here we explore insights that IE might offer into the questions at hand. Investigation of the notions of agency and autonomy from an informational point of view is useful in shedding light on the moral experience of accountability and responsibility. As with patients of the moral experience, by extending the class of moral agents in the direction of non-human agents, we can better grasp the role of humans in moral (as well as in legal) responsibility, and are better equipped to deal with the novel theoretical and practical problems arising from our interaction with artificial autonomous agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Many of these criticism and remarks are of interest but it is impossible to analyze and deal with each of them in detail. See for instance Himma 2009.

  2. 2.

    In the present chapter, there was no enough room to analyze the related topic of distributed morality, elaborated by Floridi (2013), which accounts for the morality of non-individual agents. In many different respects, Floridi is currently directing his attention to the non-individual dimension of some relevant topics (ranging from morality to privacy), which have been traditionally treated as based on strict methodological individualism.

References

  • Alpaydin, E. 2010. Introduction to Machine Learning. II ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. 2011. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Information Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1988. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. 1969. Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Philosophy LXVI: 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himma, K.-E. 2009. Artificial Agency, Consciousness, and the Criteria for Moral Agency: What Properties Must an Artificial Agent Have to Be a Moral Agent? Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1): 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. 1998. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motwani, R., and P. Raghavan. 1995. Randomized Algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U. 2013a. The Laws of Robot: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Dordrecht/Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. What Robots Want: Autonomous Machines, Codes and New Frontiers of Legal Responsibility. In Human Law and Computer Law: Comparative Perspectives, ed. M. Hildebrandt and J. Gaakeer. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S., and P. Norvig. 2010. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. III ed. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, J.-D. 1963. Raise High the Roof Beam, Carpenters and Seymour: An Introduction. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni De Sio, F. 2013. Per colpa di chi. Mente, responsabilità e diritto. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1985. Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy LXXXII: 169–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1981. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durante, M. (2017). The Morality of Artificial Agents. In: Ethics, Law and the Politics of Information . The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1150-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics