nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

15. Politics of Open Data in Russia: Regional and Municipal Perspectives

verfasst von : Yury Kabanov, Mikhail Karyagin, Viacheslav Romanov

Erschienen in: E-Democracy for Smart Cities

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The study is devoted to the development of open government data (OGD) policy in Russia, its regions and cities. We argue that although OGD are a potential driver of citizen participation and smart city innovations, these effects can be interfered with by political, institutional, socio-economic (structural) factors, as well as by agency. We use a mixed quantitative—qualitative methodology, and data gathered within the Infometer project, to unveil the determinants of OGD success and failure. Our findings suggest that although some general patterns can be traced, agency as a motivation to innovate plays a crucial role.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Attaining E-Democracy Through Digital Platforms in Kenya

Nächstes Kapitel Urbane: Community Driven Architecture and Planning Through a Mobile Social Platform

Open Government Data Principles, https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html (2007).

Putin, V.V.: Democracy and Quality of Government [in Russian]. Kommersant, 6.02.2012, http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1866753.

Decree No 601 of President of the Russian Federation On Basic Directions of Public Administration System Improvement. Adopted 7.05.2012, http://www.rg.ru/2012/05/09/gosupravlenie-dok.html [in Russian].

What is Open Data//Open Government of Russia http://opendata.open.gov.ru/event/5598184/ [in Russian].

Concept of Openness of the Federal Agencies. Adopted by the Government of the Russian Federation 30.01.2014, http://open.gov.ru/upload/iblock/37a/37a15dc7026ed84ae9a886bed7eab8a1.pdf [in Russian].

Methodological Recommendations on Open Data Publication, Vol. 3.0, http://data.gov.ru/metodicheskie-rekomendacii-po-publikacii-otkrytyh-dannyh-versiya-30 [in Russian].

Unified Standard is Possible. Interview with A. Petrachenko, responsible for OGD release in the Sakhalin region//Infometer, http://read.infometer.org/sakhalin-interview [in Russian].

http://data.gov.ru.

Open Data//Administrative Reform in Russia, http://ar.gov.ru/ru/inform_otkritost_05_otkritii_dannie/index.html [in Russian].

Global Open Data Index//Open Knowledge International, http://index.okfn.org/.

Open Data Barometer//WWW Foundation, http://opendatabarometer.org/.

http://zakupki.gov.ru/epz/main/public/home.html.

https://clearspending.ru.

http://hack.declarator.org/.

Open Region//Open Government in Russia, http://open.gov.ru/openregion/ [in Russian].

Federal Law of the Russian Federation № 112, http://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/26119.html [in Russian].

Federal Law of the Russian Federation № 8 On Access to Public Information of State and Municipal Authorities, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_84602/ [in Russian].

Federal Law of the Russian Federation № 149 On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection, http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_61798/ [in Russian].

List of Publicly Available Information, Possessed by Federal Government and to be Released as Open Data, http://www.rg.ru/2013/07/29/info-site-dok.html [in Russian].

Approved by Minutes of the Meeting of the Governmental Commission for Coordination of Open Government, #4, May 29, 2014.

Results of OGD study in Russian regions with the author’s direct involvement//Infometer system: http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/371/rating/.

Methodology//Informeter, http://en.infometer.org/monitoring/Methodology-for-the-Monitoring-of-Government-Bodies%E2%80%99-Official-Websites/1.-opisanie-metodologii-monitoringa.

http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/344/rating/ (for 72 regional administrative centers).

http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/371/rating/ (for 72 regions with administrative centers populated over 100,000).

http://www.bryanskobl.ru/opendata/3234048116-civilreg/table.

http://opendata.gov35.ru/datasets/3525082633-RegistryOfficesList.

http://www.gks.ru [in Russian].

Index of Russian Regions E-Readiness, http://eregion.ru/en/information-inequality-regions [in Russian].

Openness rating (spring 2015) http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/259/rating/.

http://www.ivzan.ru/opendata.

Open data portal http://www.bryanskobl.ru/opendata.

http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/259/rating/.

http://system.infometer.org/ru/monitoring/371/rating/.

Example: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sudebnyj-uchastok-po-buzdyakskomu-rajonu-respubliki-bashkortostan-s/act-200750130/.

Hackathon map of Russia: http://read.infometer.org/foiv2016_digest3.

Effing R, van Hillegersberg J, Huibers T (2011) Social media and political participation: are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In: Macintosh A, Tambouris E, de Bruijn H (eds) Electronic participation: third IFIP WG 8.5 international conference, EPart 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, August 29–September 1, 2011. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–35. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_3

Gil de Zúñiga H, Jung N, Valenzuela S (2012) Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J Comput Mediated Commun 3(17):319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x

Coglianese C (2009) The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance 4(22):529–544. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01451.x CrossRef

Meijer AJ, Curtin D, Hillebrandt M (2012) Open government: connecting vision and voice. Int Rev Adm Sci 1(78):10–29. doi:10.1177/0020852311429533 CrossRef

Janssen M, Charalabidis Y, Zuiderwijk A (2012) Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf Syst Manage 4(29):258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 CrossRef

Ubaldi B (2013) Open Government Data. OECD, 2013

Balch O (2013) Can open data power a smart city revolution? The guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/open-data-power-smart-city

Hinssen P (Ed.) (2013) Open data power smart cities. Across Technology, Kankarbagh

Tauberer J (2009) Open data is civic capital: best practices for “open government data”. https://razor.occams.info/pubdocs/opendataciviccapital.html

10.

Bartenberger M, Grubmüller-Régent V (2014) The enabling effects of open government data on collaborative governance in smart city contexts. eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 1(6):36–48

11.

Davies T (2010) Open data, democracy and public sector reform. A look at open government data use from data.gov.uk. http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/How-is-open-government-data-being-used-in-practice.pdf

12.

Noveck B (2016) The rise of citizen expert. Policy Netw. http://www.policy-network.net/pno_detail.aspx?ID=5056&title=The+rise+of+the+citizen+expert

13.

Gurstein MB (2011) Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday. 2(16). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3316/2764

14.

Davies T (2014) Open data policies and practice: an international comparison. Available at SSRN, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2492520 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.2492520

15.

Susha I et al (2015) Critical factors for open data publication and use: a comparison of city-level, regional, and transnational cases. JeDEM-eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 2(7):94–115

16.

Meijer A, Bekkers V (2015) A metatheory of e-government: creating some order in a fragmented research field. Gov Inf Q 3(32):237–245. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004 CrossRef

17.

Conradie P, Choenni S (2014) On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov Inf Q 31:S10–S17. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003 CrossRef

18.

Jho W, Song KJ (2015) Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: solo or duet? Gov Inf Q 4(32):488–495. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.003 CrossRef

19.

Lee C, Chang K, Berry FS (2011) Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: a global perspective. Public Adm Rev 3(71):444–544. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x CrossRef

20.

Stier S (2015) Political determinants of e-government performance revisited: comparing democracies and autocracies. Gov Inf Q 3(32):270–278. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004 CrossRef

21.

Davies T (2013) The messy reality of open data and politics. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/2013/apr/08/messy-reality-open-data-politics

22.

Serewicz L (2011) The dark side of open data: politicized data. https://lawrenceserewicz.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/the-dark-side-of-open-data-politicized-data/

23.

Peled A (2011) When transparency and collaboration collide: the USA open data program. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 11(62):2085–2094. doi:10.1002/asi.21622 CrossRef

24.

Fountain JE (2004) Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2004)

25.

Gel’man V (2014) The rise and decline of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Demokratizatsiya 4(22):503–522

26.

Katchanovski I, La Porte T (2005) Cyberdemocracy or Potemkin e-villages? Electronic governments in OECD and post-communist countries. Int J Public Adm 7–8(28):665–681. doi:10.1081/PAD-200064228 CrossRef

27.

Linde J, Karlsson M (2013) The dictator’s new clothes: the relationship between e-participation and quality of government in non-democratic regimes. Int J Public Adm 4(36):269–281. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.757619 CrossRef

28.

Karlsson M (2013) Carrots and sticks: internet governance in non–democratic regimes. Int J Electron Gov 3(6):179–186. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2013.058405 CrossRef

29.

Brancati D (2014) Democratic authoritarianism: origins and effects. Annu Rev Polit Sci 17:313–326. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248 CrossRef

30.

He B, Warren ME (2011) Authoritarian deliberation: the deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspect polit 9(02):269–289. doi:10.1017/S1537592711000892

31.

Chugunov AV, Kabanov Y, Zenchenkova K (2016) Russian e-Petitions portal: exploring regional variance in use. In international conference on electronic participation. Springer International Publishing, pp 109–122. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45074-2_9

32.

Gel’man V, Ryzhenkov S (2011) Local regimes, sub-national governance and the “power vertical” in contemporary Russia. Eur-Asia Stud 3(63):449–465. doi:10.1080/09668136.2011.557538 CrossRef

33.

Kabanov Y, Karyagin M (2015) Deserted Islands of openness: problems of open data in Russia. Politex 4:38–51 [in Russian]

34.

Norris P (2001) Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet world-wide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

35.

Gulati G, Williams C, Yates D (2014) Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: a cross-national comparison. Gov Inf Q 31(4):526–533. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.005 CrossRef

36.

Zhang H, Xu X, Xiao J (2014) Diffusion of e-government: a literature review and directions for future directions. Gov Inf Q 31(4):631–636. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.013 CrossRef

37.

Yun HJ, Opheim C (2010) Building on success: the diffusion of e-Government in the American States. Electron J E-Government 8(1):71–82

38.

Kabanov Y, Sungurov A (2016) E-Government development factors: evidence from the russian regions. In: Chugunov AV, Bolgov R, Kabanov Y, Wimmer M, Kampis G (eds) Digital transformation and global society: first international conference, DTGS 2016, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 22–24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, 85–95, Springer International Publishing (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_10

39.

Petrov N, Titkov A (2014) Rating of democracy by Moscow Carnegie Center: 10 years in service. Moscow Carnegie Center, Moscow [in Russian]

Titel: Politics of Open Data in Russia: Regional and Municipal Perspectives
verfasst von: Yury Kabanov
Mikhail Karyagin
Viacheslav Romanov
Verlag: Springer Singapore
Buch: E-Democracy for Smart Cities
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4034-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-4035-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4035-1_15

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"