Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
It’s Time to Change the Project Model Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. What We Can Learn from Corporate Governance

verfasst von : Michael Knapp

Erschienen in: Enterprise Portfolio Governance

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Portfolio, program and project (3P) Governance is an immature field of study, with fewer than 200 published research papers and the majority of these focused on project governance. Theory development is equally immature with available standards (such as published by the PMI) being called ‘practice guides’, which is useful enough, although the theories grounding such practices are either ‘thin’ or simply non-existent.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Governance and Organisation Project Maturity
Nächstes Kapitel Governance Behaviours
Literatur
Argyres, N. S., & Liebeskind, J. P. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 49–63.CrossRef
Argyris, C. (1998). Empowerment: The emperor’s new clothes. In Harvard business review. Harvard: HBS Press.
Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: McMillan.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268–295.CrossRef
Clegg, S., Schweitzer, J., Whittle, A., & Pitelis, C. (2017). Strategy: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
Cleland, D. I. (1995). Leadership and the project-management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 13, 83–88.CrossRef
Daily, C. M., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28, 371–382.CrossRef
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.CrossRef
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Theory and consequences. Journal of Political Economics, 93, 11–55.CrossRef
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.CrossRef
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514–539.CrossRef
Drucker, P. (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper and Row.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989a). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57–74.CrossRef
Eisenhardt, K. (1989b). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 63.CrossRef
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards a sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36, 90–100.CrossRef
Fiedler, F. E. (1971). Leadership. New York: General Learning Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1.CrossRef
Hershey, B., & Blanchard, K. (1982). Management of organisational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6, 101–111.CrossRef
Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.CrossRef
Jacobs, D. C., & Getz, K. A. (1995). Dialogue on the ‘stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications’. Academy of Management Review, 20, 793–795.CrossRef
Jawahar, I. M., & Mclaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26, 397–414.CrossRef
Jensen, M. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 56, 319–338.
Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8–25.CrossRef
Kloppenborg, T. J., Tesch, D., Manolis, C., & Heitkamp, M. (2006). An empirical investigation of the sponsor’s role in project initiation. Project Management Journal, 37, 16–25.
Kloppenborg, T. J., Stubblebine, P. C., & Tesch, D. (2007). Project manager vs. executive perceptions of sponsor behaviors. Management Research News, 30, 803–815.CrossRef
Kotter, J. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, 68, 103–111.
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (1995). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lawler, E., Benson, G., Finegold, D., & Conger, J. (2002). Corporate boards: Keys to effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 310–324.CrossRef
Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28, 416–431.CrossRef
Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and reality. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Mccrann, T. (2006). McGauchie line on cousins appointment has hypocritical ring. The Australian, 30/9/2006.
Mcdonald, M., Khanna, P., & Westphal, J. (2008). Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEOS’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 453–475.CrossRef
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row.
Morgenson, G. (2016). By taking back money, Wells Fargo’s board seems to recall its. New York Times: Role.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organisations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Pugliese, A. B., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 292–306.CrossRef
Robb, F. (1989). Cybernetics and suprahuman autopoietic systems. Systems Practice, 2, 47–74.CrossRef
Roberts, J., Mcnulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16, S5–S26.CrossRef
Shen, W. (2003). The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 466–476.CrossRef
Singh, H., & Useem, M. (2016). The strategic leader’s roadmap. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press.
Staff Reporter. (2007). Since the bid for the flying Roo failed, much air has flowed under its wings. The Age, 10/6/2008.
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397–415.CrossRef
Turner, R., & Muller, R. (2005). The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 398–403.CrossRef
Walsh, J., & Seward, J. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15, 421–458.CrossRef
Yukl, G. A. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management Development, 15, 251–289.
Metadaten
Titel
What We Can Learn from Corporate Governance
verfasst von
Michael Knapp
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Enterprise Portfolio Governance

Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7837-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-10-7838-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7838-5_4