Skip to main content
Log in

Response of Elodea canadensis Michx, and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture

  • Control of Freshwater and Riparian Vegetation
  • Chemical and Physical Approaches
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elodea canadensis Michx. and Myriophyllum spicatum L. are widespread nuisance aquatic plant species. Their ecology is regarded as similar. Both species have been previously classified in terms of established-phase survival strategy as ‘competitive disturbance-tolerant’ species. Experimental data are presented to show that although this broad categorisation of strategy is probably correct for the two species, it is possible to demonstrate significant differences in terms of response to disturbance and competition. Less difference was discernible in their comparative response to stress. The drawbacks of applying broad descriptive terminology when dealing with two species of similar strategy are addressed. The results help explain reports of variable success in attempting to manage these two species using disturbance-based weed control measures, and suggest that Elodea is even less susceptible to such measures than Myriophyllum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernethy, V. J., 1994. The functional ecology of euhydrophyte communities of European riverine wetland ecosystems. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Glasgow. 265 pp.

  • Anderson, L. W. J., 1990. Aquatic weed problems and management in the western United States and Canada. In A. H. Pieterse & K. J. Murphy (eds), Aquatic Weeds. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barko, S. W. & R. M. Smart, 1981. Comparative influences of light and temperature on the growth and metabolism of selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., C. Henry, M.-H. Barrat & C. Amoros, 1994. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits and species richness: aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Rh6ne River and its floodplain. Freshwat. Biol. 31: 487–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, P. A. & J. Kalff, 1985. The influence of sediment composition and irradiance on the growth and morphology of Myriophyllum spicatum L. Aquat. Bot. 22: 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester. 222 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P., J. G. Hodgson & R. Hunt, 1988. Comparative plant ecology. A functional approach to British species. Unwin & Hyman, London. 742 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, G. A. F. & J. P. Grime, 1993. Methods in comparative plant ecology. Chapman & Hall, London. 252 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. M., K. J. Murphy, I. D. Pulford & T. H. Flowers, 1994. A method for classifying European riverine wetland ecosystems using functional plant groups. Funct. Ecol. 8: 242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt 29: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. P. L. D. & R. W. Snaydon, 1982. Analysis of competition experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 19: 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. J., T. O. Robson, M. Arsenovic & W. van der Zweerde, 1990a. Aquatic weed problems and management in Europe. In A. H. Pieterse & K. J. Murphy (eds), Aquatic Weeds. Oxford University Press: Oxford: 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. J., B. Rørslett & I. Springuel, 1990b. Strategy analysis of submerged lake macrophyte communities: an international example. Aquat. Bot. 36: 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. A. & B. H. Shaw, 1986. Ecological life histories of three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia 131: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pautou, G. & M.-F. Arens, 1994. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits and species richness: floodplain vegetation in the Upper Rhône valley. Freshwat. Biol. 31: 507–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbatini, M. R. & K. J. Murphy, 1996. Submerged plant survival strategy in relation to management and environmental pressures in drainage channel habitats. Hydrobiologia 340 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 120): 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, R. B. & C. W. Boylen, 1979. Maximum depth inhabited by aquatic vascular plants. Am. Midl. Nat. 97: 248–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. A., 1984. A short history of the introduction and spread of Elodea Michx. in the British Isles. Watsonia 15: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S. & J. W. Barko, 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt 28: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, K. K., 1990. Aquatic weed problems and management in the eastern United States. In A. H. Pieterse & K. J. Murphy (eds), Aquatic Weeds. Oxford University Press: Oxford: 391–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abernethy, V.J., Sabbatini, M.R. & Murphy, K.J. Response of Elodea canadensis Michx, and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture. Hydrobiologia 340, 219–224 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012758

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012758

Key words

Navigation